Skip to content

Comparison of HFNC With NIV in Weaning COPD

Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation in Facilitating Weaning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease From Invasive Ventilation: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03458364
Enrollment
42
Registered
2018-03-08
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2018-07-30
Last updated
2018-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation

Keywords

Weaning; Noninvasive ventilation; High flow nasal cannula

Brief summary

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been shown to improve oxygenation and facilitate weaning in hypoxemia patients. Some clinical studies show the benefits of using HFNC in COPD patients, including reducing dead space and work of breathing. However, no clinical study has been to investigate the value of HFNC in weaning COPD patients from invasive ventilation. Thus, we proposed a randomized controlled trial to compare the use of HFNC and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in weaning COPD.

Detailed description

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides high concentration oxygen in a high flow, which exceeds patient's inspiratory flow demand, to improve oxygenation. In a recent meta-analysis of seven trials with 1771 patients, HFNC was shown to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in patients with severe hypoxemia. The high velocity of the gas can rinse the dead space of the upper airway and reduce CO2 rebreathing, reduce COPD patients' work of breathing and improve the dynamic compliance of respiratory system. Thus, we proposed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the value of high flow nasal cannula in weaning AECOPD patients from invasive ventilation, with comparison of noninvasive ventilation.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh flow nasal cannula

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a recent technique delivering a high flow of heated and humidified gas. HFNC is simpler to use and apply than noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and appears to be a good alternative treatment for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF). HFNC is better tolerated than NIV, delivers high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), generates a low level of positive pressure and provides washout of dead space in the upper airways, thereby improving mechanical pulmonary properties and unloading inspiratory muscles during ARF.

DEVICENoninvasive ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the use of airway support administered through a face (nasal) mask instead of an endotracheal tube. Inhaled gases are given with positive end-expiratory pressure often with pressure support or with assist control ventilation at a set tidal volume and rate. Numerous studies have shown this technique to be as effective as, and better tolerated than, intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with exacerbations of COPD

Sponsors

Binzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Jie Li
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Intubated patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation * Meeting extubation criteria (Pulmonary infection control window) * Age \> 21years and \< 90 years

Exclusion criteria

* Tracheotomy * Combined with severe dysfunction of other organs, including heart, brain, liver, and renal failure; * Hemodynamic instability * Contraindication to NIV: cannot use mask, such as facial injury, burns or deformities; cannot cooperate with NIV such as delirium; copious secretions with weak cough ability; gastric over distention, and vomiting; * Contraindication to HFNC: rhinitis, nasal congestion, deformities or blockage. * Weak cough ability with copious secretions * Refuse to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RRchange from the baseline RR within 48 hoursrespiratory rate in breaths per minute
pHchange from the baseline pH within 48 hourspH
PaCO2change from the baseline PaCO2 within 48 hoursPaCO2 in mmHg
PaO2/FiO2change from the baseline PaO2/FiO2 within 48 hourspartial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/ fraction of inspired oxygen in mmHg
HRchange from the baseline HR within 48 hoursHeart Rate in beats per minute
MAPchange from the baseline MAP within 48 hoursmean arterial pressure in mmHg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of barotrauma28 days
duration of respiratory support28 dayshours of ventilator use
Length of ICU stay28 daysDays of stay in ICU
Mortality28 days
the patients' comfort score48 hourscomfort score of using high flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilator, ranging from 1 to 10. 1 means very comfortable, 10 means very uncomfortable.
incidence of nasal trauma28 days

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026