Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Arrhythmia, Ventricular Arrythmia
Conditions
Keywords
Atrial Arrhythmia, Ventricular Arrythmia, ablation, fluoroscopy
Brief summary
A Retrospective Propensity Matched Study comparing: * real zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation * conventional fluoroscopy catheter ablation without 3D system * conventional fluoroscopy catheter ablation with 3D system
Detailed description
Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment to treat patients with a wide scope of heart arrhythmias. The study is an investigator-initiated, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The study population consists of patients with right-sided arrhythmias who underwent zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation between the years 2016 and 2018 in 3 centers and a propensity score matched patients group of patients who: * underwent conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation without 3D system (Ensite/Carto) support * underwent conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation with 3D system (Ensite/Carto) support Covariates for matching will be: * arrhythmia type * age of a patient * number of diagnostic catheters used during a procedure * type of a diagnostic catheter used during a procedure\]
Interventions
PROCEDUREZero fluoroscopy ablation
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - no fluoroscopy guidance
PROCEDUREConventional ablation without 3D
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - fluoroscopy guidance only. 3D system (Every Ensite/Carto) is not allowed
PROCEDUREConventional ablation with 3D
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - fluoroscopy guidance + 3D system support (Ensite/Carto)
Sponsors
Medical University of Lublin
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
* right atrial tachycardia * right atrial premature complexes * AVNRT * right atrial AVRT/WPW * right ventricle tachycardia / right ventricle premature complexes
Exclusion criteria
* left atrium arrhythmia * left ventricle arrhythmia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Procedural success rates | 3 months | arrhythmia recurrence within 3 months since the index procedure |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy time | during procedure | total fluoroscopy time during procedure |
| Acute procedural success | 10-30 minutes | acute procedural success defined as arhhythia elimination |
| Recurrence rate | 6 months | arrhythmia recurrence within 6 months since the index procedure |
| Total procedure time | during procedure | total procedure time measured as needle to needle time |
| All Complications rate | 6 months | Procedural Complications and Complications within 6 months since the index procedure |
| The length of stay during the hospitalization | 1 month | Number of hospital days for ablation procedure from admission to discharge |
| Acute Complications rate | during procedure | Procedural Complications procedure |
Countries
Poland
Contacts
Primary ContactMaciej Wójcik, MD, PhD
Outcome results
None listed