Skip to content

Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Lupus Nephritis

Clinical Study of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Lupus Nephritis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03458156
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-03-08
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2018-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Nephritis

Brief summary

To investigate the safety and efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN).

Detailed description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease. Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most serious complications of SLE. The current clinical treatments of LN mainly include steroids and immunosuppressive drugs, but drug side effects are obvious.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSLE group

The patients will be assigned to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) group, receiving umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation.

BIOLOGICALLN group

The patients will be assigned to lupus nephritis (LN) group, receiving umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation.

OTHERthe control group

The patients will be assigned to the control group.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meeting the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria of SLE. * age 18-60 years. * of either sex and of any ethnicity. * Lupus nephritis (LN) group: (1) Receiving more than 6 months of regular treatment, 24-hour urine protein ≥ 1.0 g, serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL; (2) renal biopsy: class III, IV or V LN included, and class VI excluded. * After conventional treatment (glucocorticoid therapy and immunosuppressive drugs) prior to grouping, SLEDAI scores ≥ 10. * Receiving 12 months of treatment while using birth control. * Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Poor blood pressure control by drug treatment (≥ 160/100 mmHg) * Abnormal hepatic function (a 3-fold increase in alanine aminotransferase level relative to normal liver). * Renal failure (glomerular filtration rate \< 15 mL/min/1.73 m2). * Severe heart and lung failure, or injury to other important organs * Uncontrollable infection. * Having not taken biological agents for 6 months. * Pregnant or lactating women, or those women who are trying to get pregnant or those men who are trying to make their partners pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SLEDAI-2000 scorechanges of month 3, month 6, month 9 and month 12 after treatmentThe SLEDAI 2000 is a novel index that measures ≥ 50% in each of the 24 descriptors of SLEDAI-2K and generates a total score reflecting disease activity overall.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BILAG-2004 scorechanges of month 3, month 6, month 9 and month 12 after treatmentThe BILAG-2004 is a comprehensive composite clinical index that has been recently validated for the assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity. This index is based on the Classic BILAG index and has many similarities with its predecessor: it is based on the principle of the physician's intention to treat, has transitional property that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations and has a similar ordinal scale scoring system. However, it has nine systems and many of the changes (from the Classic BILAG index) are in the items, glossary and scoring scheme. As with the Classic BILAG index, the individual system scores were not intended to be summated into a global score.
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scorechanges of month 3, month 6, month 9 and month 12 after treatmentThe Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) has played an influential role in establishing health outcome assessment as a quantifiable set of reliable, valid and responsive hard data points. The HAQ is based on five patient-centered dimensions: disability, pain, medication effects, costs of care, and mortality. It has been validated by mail, in the office, by telephone, and by comparison with paraprofessional and physician judgments as a reliable instrument, and has been significantly correlated with other PRO instruments. Typically, one of two HAQ versions is used: the Full HAQ, which assesses all five dimensions, and the Short or 2-page HAQ, which contains only the HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) and the HAQ's patient global and pain visual analog scales (VAS).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026