Skip to content

Respiratory Depression During an Analgosedation Combining Remifentanil and Ketamine in TCI for Oocyte Retrieval

Study of Respiratory Depression During Analgosedation Technique Combining Remifentanyl and Ketamine in TCI for Oocyte Retrieval

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03458143
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-03-08
Start date
2018-02-12
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2018-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oocyte Retrieval, Sedation, Conscious, Ventilatory Depression

Keywords

ketamine, remifentanil

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effect of the addition of ketamine to a conscious sedation protocol including remifentanil during oocyte retrieval. The investigators will have 2 groups with different target effect site concentrations, namely 150 ng/ml and 200 ng/ml.

Detailed description

The actual protocol for conscious sedation during oocyte retrieval in at the Erasmus hospital (Brussels) consists of Remifentanil in TCI-mode, with premedication by Midazolam. However, episodes of bradypnaea with or without desaturation are still common. The primary objective is to observe if with the addition of ketamine, it is possible to significantly reduce the dose of Remifentanil, in order to avoid episodes of respiratory depression caused by the opioid. The secondary outcomes measured, will be the pain levels experienced by the patient, the sedation level, and the satisfaction of the patients after the procedure.

Interventions

DRUGKetamine 150 ng/ml

conscious sedation in TCI-mode

DRUGRemifentanil

conscious sedation in TCI-mode

PROCEDUREOocyte retrieval

Oocyte retrieval for In Vitro Fertilization

DRUGKetamine 200 ng/ml

conscious sedation in TCI-mode

Sponsors

Erasme University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients having an oocyte retrieval

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \> 30 * endometriosis * contraindications to ketamine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory depressionthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsSpO2 (%)
respiratory depressionthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsrespiratory rate (number of inspiration per minute)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pregnancy rate15 days after the oocyte retrievalHCG in the blood
ketamine dosagethrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsblood sample (serum)
sedation levelthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsOAAS: Observer's Assessment Of Alertness/Sedation Scale. 5=Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone. 4=Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone. 3=Response only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly. 2=Response only after mild prodding or shaking. 1=Response only after paintful trapezius squeeze. 0=No response after paintful trapezius squeeze. Values higher than 3 represents a better outcome.
painthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsEVA
Heart ratethrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsBeats per minute
Painthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsNOL-index
Sedation levelthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsRamsay sedation scale. 1=Anxious and agitated or restless, or both. 2=Co-operative, oriented, and calm. 3=Responsive to commands only. 4=Exhibiting brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. 5=Exhibiting a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. 6=unresponsive. Values of 2-3 represent the better outcome.
Arterial pressurethrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsmmHg
patient satisfactionthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthssatisfaction scale: 1=unsatisfied. 2=average satisfaction 3=Satisfied 4=very satisfied. The higher the value, the better. Additionally, we ask the patients if they would choose the same anesthetic method, should it be necessary to repeat the procedure. If yes, it is considered a better outcome.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary Contactbarvais luc, MD PhD
luc.barvais@erasme.ulb.ac.be+3225553919

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026