Skip to content

Therapy of the Skeletal Disease of Type 2 Diabetes With Denosumab

Therapy of the Skeletal Disease of Type 2 Diabetes With Denosumab

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03457818
Enrollment
8
Registered
2018-03-08
Start date
2018-11-07
Completion date
2020-06-10
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Osteoporosis

Keywords

Prolia, Denosumab, Diabetes

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to characterize the effect of Prolia® (denosumab) on indices of bone strength in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The investigational plan involves administration of Prolia® or identical placebo for 12 months as a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 66 T2D postmenopausal women assigned to Prolia® or placebo. The study will include assessment of different measures of bone quality: skeletal microarchitecture, including measurement of skeletal cortical pores; bone mineral density; bone material quality, and accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in collagen. This information will help to determine whether Prolia® treatment in type 2 diabetes has skeletal benefits.

Detailed description

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) has become one of the most important diseases of our time. Recent research shows that diabetes has negative effects on bones and that people with diabetes might be more likely to break a bone. We don't know the reasons for this, but we suspect that normal bone replacement is slowed down in diabetes and this could slow down the growth of new bone. It is possible that the normal bone material becomes weaker because sugar-related components (Advanced Glycation Endproducts) are making the bone more brittle. The investigators have shown in past research that people who have type 2 diabetes are more likely to have both weaker bone with lower bone material strength and also higher levels of sugar-related components (Advanced Glycation Endproducts). This study will focus on attempting to lower the sugar-related components (Advanced Glycation Endproducts) by treating a group of patients with type 2 diabetes with a medication Prolia® or denosumab for one year. The investigators will compare postmenopausal women both before and after denosumab use and study them in terms of different bone features based on blood tests, bone imaging, a bone indentation test and a measurement of sugar-related components in the skin. This study will help to clarify if using this medication helps improve bone strength in women with diabetes.

Interventions

Denosumab 60 mg will be administered subcutaneously in the upper arm at the Baseline and 6 Month Visits

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo will be administered subcutaneously in the upper arm at the Baseline and 6 Month Visits

Sponsors

Mishaela Rubin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Clinical Research Coordinators

Intervention model description

The study is a 12 month randomized (2:1 assignment) double-blind placebo-controlled trial of T2D postmenopausal women assigned to either Denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously (SC) at baseline and 6 months (n=44) or placebo (n=22); total study n=66.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. An understanding, ability and willingness to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions. 2. Ability to voluntarily provide written, signed and dated informed consent as applicable to participate in the study. 3. Postmenopausal women age ≥ 50 and ≤ 90 years at time of consent. 4. Diagnosis of T2D for ≥ 2 years. Upon review of patient's medical history, patient will be confirmed to currently have reasonably controlled T2D as assessed by the investigator, with HbA1c ≤ 8.4%. If HbA1c is ≥ 8.5%, re-screening will be allowed after approximately 3 months following adjustment of diabetes therapy. 5. DXA T-score ≤ -1.0 at one or more sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip or distal 1/3 radius). 6. Normal albumin-adjusted serum calcium level.

Exclusion criteria

1. Hormone replacement treatment use (to avoid the influence of estrogen). 2. Fractures (excluding skull, facial bones, metacarpals, fingers, toes, and fractures associated with severe trauma) within 12 months. 3. A history of pathological fractures (eg, due to Paget's disease, myeloma, metastatic malignancy). 4. Type 1 diabetes. 5. Disorders associated with altered skeletal structure or function (chronic renal disease stage 4 or worse, chronic liver disease, malignancy, hypoparathyroidism or hyperparathyroidism, acromegaly, Cushing's syndrome, hypopituitarism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol intake \> 3 units/day). 6. Treatment with any of the following drugs in past year: anticonvulsant therapy, pharmacological doses of thyroid hormone (TSH\<normal is permitted if subject has normal T4, clinical euthyroidism and is in steady-state), adrenal or anabolic steroids, calcitonin, estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulator, sodium fluoride (other than dental treatment), teriparatide, denosumab, abaloparatide, strontium or aromatase inhibitors; any history of bisphosphonate treatment. Corticosteroid use permitted if subject is in steady-state. 7. Serum 25(OH)D levels \< 20 ng/ml. If 25(OH)D levels are \< 20 ng/ml, rescreening will be allowed following a vitamin D loading regimen of 50,000 IU/week for 4 weeks. If serum 25(OH)D levels are ≥ 20 ng/ml after supplementation, the subject will be allowed to enroll. 8. Clinically significant hypersensitivity to denosumab or any components of denosumab 60 mg. 9. Known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered during the study (e.g., calcium or vitamin D). 10. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant within 5 months after the end of treatment. 11. Female subject of child bearing potential and is not willing to use, in combination with her partner, highly effective contraception during treatment and for 5 months after the end of treatment. 12. Significant dental/oral disease, including prior history or current evidence of osteonecrosis/osteomyelitis of the jaw, or the following: * Active dental or jaw condition which requires oral surgery * Non-healed dental/oral surgery * Planned invasive dental procedures for the course of the study 13. DXA T-score of ≤ -3.5 at any site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po) (%) by High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) Imaging From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.Baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe primary outcome is the 12 months change in Ct.Po and the primary intent-to-treat analysis is a one-way ANCOVA with the fixed effect of treatment (treated vs. placebo), and baseline Ct.Po as a continuous covariate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Serum Collagen Type I C-Telopeptide (s-CTX) (ng/ml) and Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRAP 5b) (ng/ml) by Blood Test From Baseline to 3, 6 and 12 Months.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsSecondary outcomes will be analyzed using ANCOVA models with P-value adjustment for multiple endpoint comparisons.
Change in Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) (gm/cm2) at Lumbar Spine, Femoral Neck, Total Hip and Radius From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.Screening visit, 6 months and 12 monthsSecondary outcomes will be analyzed using ANCOVA models with P-value adjustment for multiple endpoint comparisons.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Skin Autofluorescence (SAF) (Unitless) From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.Baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsExploratory outcomes will be analyzed using ANCOVA models with P-value adjustment for multiple endpoint comparisons.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Group
Denosumab 60 mg/ml \[Prolia\] SC at baseline and 6 months. Denosumab 60 mg/ml \[Prolia\]: Denosumab 60 mg will be administered subcutaneously in the upper arm at the Baseline and 6 Month Visits
4
Control Group
Placebo SC at Baseline and 6 months. Placebo: Placebo will be administered subcutaneously in the upper arm at the Baseline and 6 Month Visits
4
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupTotalTreatment Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous69.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants8 participants4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 41 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 41 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po) (%) by High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) Imaging From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.

The primary outcome is the 12 months change in Ct.Po and the primary intent-to-treat analysis is a one-way ANCOVA with the fixed effect of treatment (treated vs. placebo), and baseline Ct.Po as a continuous covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: The study was terminated due to poor enrollment compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Data for Primary Outcome Measure was not collected.

Secondary

Change in Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) (gm/cm2) at Lumbar Spine, Femoral Neck, Total Hip and Radius From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.

Secondary outcomes will be analyzed using ANCOVA models with P-value adjustment for multiple endpoint comparisons.

Time frame: Screening visit, 6 months and 12 months

Population: The study was terminated due to poor enrollment compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was not collected.

Secondary

Change in Serum Collagen Type I C-Telopeptide (s-CTX) (ng/ml) and Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRAP 5b) (ng/ml) by Blood Test From Baseline to 3, 6 and 12 Months.

Secondary outcomes will be analyzed using ANCOVA models with P-value adjustment for multiple endpoint comparisons.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Population: The study was terminated due to poor enrollment compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was not collected.

Other Pre-specified

Change in Skin Autofluorescence (SAF) (Unitless) From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.

Exploratory outcomes will be analyzed using ANCOVA models with P-value adjustment for multiple endpoint comparisons.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: The study was terminated due to poor enrollment compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026