Skip to content

The Clinical Efficacy of Midline Catheters

The Clinical Efficacy of Midline Catheters for Intravenous Therapy: a Randomized, Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03457259
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-03-07
Start date
2018-02-12
Completion date
2019-07-30
Last updated
2020-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intravenous Catheters

Keywords

Midline catheter, peripheral venous catheter, central venous catheter, complication rate

Brief summary

The study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of midline catheters compared to conventional treatment in patients with an expected intravenous therapy duration of more than 5 days. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The study will include 120 patient. Endpoints include insertion of CVSs, peripheral venous catheters, catheter patency and a number of possible complications.

Interventions

DEVICEPVC and/or PICCline

Pt. will receive PVC and/or PICCline

DEVICEMidline

Pt. will receive midline

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

60 patients in each group, with a total of 2 groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission to the Department of Infectious Disease or Department of Heart Disease. * ≥18 years of age * Expected requirement for iv. therapy \>5 days from the day of enrolment as evaluated by a specialist in infectious diseases. * Mentally competency

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of patient consent * Requirement for a CVC before study eligibility screening or anticipation of an absolute indication for CVC inserted within 24 hours of screening * Personnel for insertion of midline catheter not available

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reducing the use of CVC and PVCthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthThe fraction of patients requiring either a CVC - including PICC line - or require ≥ 4PVC insertions during the current admittance to the hospital, including follow-up intravenous therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Problems with catheter bloodsamplingthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthRegistration of aspiration problems during bloodsampling in midline catheters
Bloodsamples (conventional)through study completion, an average of 7 monthRegistration of number of blood samples taken from conventional blood samples in both groups
Patient satisfactionthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthPatient satisfaction on NRS score, 0 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied
Nurse satisfactionthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthNurse satisfaction on NRS score, 0 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied
Painscorethrough study completion, an average of 7 monthAccumulated NRS pain score for all IV catheter insertions. 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain
Rescue catherizations 1through study completion, an average of 7 monthRescue PVC's inserted (midline group) (no)
Rescue catherizations 2through study completion, an average of 7 monthRescue central venous catheters including PICC line catheters inserted (no)
Time consumptionthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthTotal time of cauterization, (measured from the entrance in patient room, to the exit)
Catheter dwelltimethrough study completion, an average of 7 monthTime of catheter duration (hours)
Fluidthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthAccumulated fluids infused (L)
Treatment typethrough study completion, an average of 7 monthType of medicine infused (all types)
Bloodsamples from catheterthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthRegistration of number of blood samples taken from the midline catheter
Catheter related infectionsthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthCatheters removed due to suspected catheter-related infection (no)
Thrombosis 1through study completion, an average of 7 monthThrombi visible at the catheter tip (no)
Thrombosis 2through study completion, an average of 7 monthDeep venous thrombosis of the ipsilateral arm (no)
Thrombosis 3through study completion, an average of 7 monthSuperficial venous thrombosis of the ipsilateral arm (midline group) (no)
Thrombosis 4through study completion, an average of 7 monthPatients starting anti-thrombotic medicine due to thrombi generated by an IV catheter (no)
Catheter discontinuationthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthReasons for replacing catheters (all types)
Insertion complicationthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthArterial punctures during catheter insertions (no)
Insertion complication 2through study completion, an average of 7 monthhaematomas during catheter insertions (no)
Insertion complication 3through study completion, an average of 7 monthMisplaced catheters (no)
Neuropraxiathrough study completion, an average of 7 monthPost-procedure median nerve palsy/neuropraxia (midline group) (no)
Treatment amountthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthAmount of medicine infused (L)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026