Skip to content

Intrauterine Insemination With Letrozole Versus in Natural Cycle

Intrauterine Insemination With Letrozole Versus Intrauterine Insemination in Natural Cycle. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03455426
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-03-06
Start date
2018-03-15
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Intrauterine Insemination

Brief summary

Rationale: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the treatment of first choice for couples with unexplained and mild male factor infertility in many countries, but it is controversial whether ovarian stimulation improves fertility outcomes. In recent retrospectively collected data, investigators found that in couples with unexplained and mild male factor infertility undergoing IUI, ovarian stimulation with letrozole increased live birth rate as compared to natural cycle IUI without substantially increasing the multiple pregnancy rate. Investigators therefore perform a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on the subject in the Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. Objective: To test the hypothesis that in couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility scheduled for an IUI program ovarian stimulation with letrozole increases the live birth rate as compared to natural cycle treatment. Study design Randomized clinical trial. Study population Women diagnosed with unexplained or mild male factor infertility scheduled for treatment with IUI. Intervention Women will be randomized for ovarian stimulation with letrozole or to natural cycle IUI. In the group allocated to ovarian stimulation, women will receive oral tablets letrozole 5 mg daily from cycle day 3-5 for 5 days. Investigators will treat the couples for 3 cycles, with a time horizon of 4 months. Main study parameters/endpoints Primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth. Secondary endpoints are clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage rates, pregnancy complications and patients' costs. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness The strategies compared are already broadly applied in current practice. No additional risks are expected. There is no benefit for participants, but the results may benefit future subfertile couples.

Interventions

DRUGletrozole

Women will be randomizedfor ovarian stimulation with letrozole or to natural cycle IUI.

Sponsors

Peking University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being diagnosed with unexplained or mild male subfertility * At least one sided tubal patency, established according to local protocol * Normal or mild impairment of semen quality defined as a TMSC of 3 million or more based on at least one semen analysis

Exclusion criteria

* Woman with double sided tubal pathology * Women with irregular cycles, PCOS or other endocrine disorders * Impaired semen quality: pre-wash TMSC \<3 million.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ongoing pregnancy3 monthsPrimary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026