Skip to content

Therapeutic Alliance Tensions and Repair in Psychotherapy Practices

Therapeutic Alliance Tensions and Repair in Psychotherapy Practices: A Psychotherapy Practice Research Network (PPRNet) Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03453957
Enrollment
84
Registered
2018-03-05
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2021-08-14
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychotherapy, Therapeutic Alliance

Keywords

Practice based research

Brief summary

This study evaluates a professional development program intended to improve the relationship or alliance between therapists and patients/clients who are receiving psychotherapy in the community. Half of the participating therapists will receive training to detect and improve alliance with new patients while half will not. The professional development training is expected to improve therapists effectiveness in identifying and correcting alliance tensions which will, in turn, improve therapeutic outcomes for patients/clients.

Detailed description

Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for many mental disorders, yet there is a gap between research and practice. Research indicates that: the therapist-patient alliance is important to reduce patient symptoms, alliance tensions are detrimental to patients, and those therapists who identify and repair alliance tensions can improve patient outcomes. In this study we will use state of the art research to train community-based therapists in evidence-based interventions to identify and repair alliance tensions. Trained therapists and their patients will be compared to therapists who provide usual care to their patients. Improvement in therapists' skills in identifying and repairing alliance tensions and how this is associated with better patient mental health outcomes will be measured. Trained therapists will be interviewed to identify the best ways of improving the training and disseminating the findings to psychotherapists across Canada. Research to improve practicing therapists' ability to identify and repair therapeutic alliance tensions will result in better mental health outcomes for patients.

Interventions

OTHERProfessional development program

Professional development program consists of training including workshops and consultation sessions to enhance therapists ability to detect and repair alliance ruptures in active community based psychotherapy.

Sponsors

University of Ottawa
Lead SponsorOTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participating therapists will be aware of their group (Asynchronous virtual training, synchronous virtual workshop training, no training control); however, their participating patient/clients will not know which experimental group their therapists belongs to.

Intervention model description

This will be a 2-arm, parallel, prospective, single-blind cluster RCT with 1-1 allocation comparing: (a) therapists who receive the professional development intervention to identify and repair alliance tensions at the study outset versus (b) therapists who receive the intervention after participation is complete (no training control). Therapists will be randomized to study condition and patients will be clustered within therapists. Randomization will control for: (a) the effect of therapist variables (age, gender, theoretical orientation, experience, differing initial skill level) on competence, therapeutic alliance, or patient outcomes; (b) potential biases caused by pre-treatment patient variables (symptom severity, co-morbidity, chronicity, psychoactive medications); and (c) treatment or study factors (e.g. frequency of sessions, time to complete the study sessions, treatment received after the study sessions). Patients will be blind to therapist study arm allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Therapist Inclusion Criteria: * regulated health professional * in good standing with a Canadian provincial regulatory college * scope of practice includes psychotherapy * ability to add 3 or more new, English speaking clients to caseload over 6 to 9 months * ability to obtain timely permission to conduct research from therapist's employing institution or health group when applicable

Exclusion criteria

* none Patient/Client Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years of age or older * will participate in psychotherapy sessions in English * will see the study-affiliated therapist for a minimum of 6 sessions in the next 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean tension resolution rating scale6 therapy sessions over 6 weeks up to 6 months depending on the frequency of therapyThe Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS) is an observer-based measure to identify alliance tensions and resolution processes. Independent blind reliable trained judges will rate video recordings of 6 psychotherapy session recorded with participating clients. A mean tension score will be assigned per client which will be the average of the 6 session scores. score ranges from 1 (withdrawal/confrontation rupture(s) did not occur; not significant for the alliance) to 5 (withdrawal/confrontation rupture(s) occurred; significant for the alliance).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) change from baselinebaseline and end of 6 therapy sessions, 6 weeks to 6 months depending on the frequency of therapySelf-report measurement of severity of anxiety using the GAD-7 scale. A change in anxiety scores will be assess following 6 therapy session with data collected before therapy(baseline) and again after all 6 sessions of therapy have been completed. Scores range from 0 (low anxiety) to 27 (high anxiety) with scores over 10 being of clinical significance.
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item scale (PHQ-9) change from baselinebaseline and end of 6 therapy sessions, 6 weeks to 6 months depending on the frequency of therapySelf-report measurement of depression symptoms using the PHQ-9 scale. A change in depression symptom scores will be assess following 6 therapy session with data collected before therapy and again after all 6 sessions of therapy have been completed. Scores range from 0 (low) to 27 (high) with scores over 10 being of clinical significance.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGiorgio Tasca, Ph.D.

University of Ottawa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026