Skip to content

Scrambler Trial for Pain in NMOSD

Phase II, Randomized, Single Blind Sham Controlled Trial Investigating Scrambler Therapy for Neuropathic Pain Caused by Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03452176
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-03-02
Start date
2018-02-21
Completion date
2019-08-29
Last updated
2020-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromyelitis Optica

Brief summary

A novel technology called Scrambler Therapy is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of C fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. This neuromodulatory therapy has been investigated for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in several conditions including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and post-surgical neuropathic pain with promising results. Patients report sustained relief after undergoing daily treatment sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays. This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 & 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Detailed description

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that disproportionately affects non-Caucasians and females,1,2 and has a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.52 to 4.4/100,000.3 NMOSD preferentially causes recurrent inflammatory attacks in the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to blindness, paralysis and death. Despite these devastating consequences of the disease, patients have reported that pain is among the most prevalent and debilitating symptom, and impacts mood, mobility and quality of life (QoL). In particular, central neuropathic pain (CNP) is pervasive, severe, intractable to treatment, and affects 62-91% of patients with NMOSD. CNP is described as agonizing burning, stabbing, shooting, tingling or squeezing sensation that is distressing, persistent and incapacitating.13,14 The presence of CNP in NMOSD is a direct consequence of targeted immune-mediated destruction of the spinal cord and may be influenced by lesion span and location: NMOSD lesions are generally transverse, involving both the central gray matter and dorsal horns. The dorsal horns are innervated by primary ascending fibers that convey sensory information to the brain. Damage to the central gray matter in NMOSD leads to astrocytic damage and tissue necrosis, thus disrupting sensory pain tracts going to and from the brain. As a consequence of ongoing spontaneous activity arising in the periphery, surviving neurons develop increased background activity and increased responses to ascending nerve impulses, including normally harmless tactile stimulation. An additional mechanism of CNP involves peripheral sensitization of non-myelinated ascending C fibers interpreted by the brain as persistent pain, a characteristic sign of an inflammatory process in the spinal cord. Spinal CNP typically presents weeks to months after the cord damage has occurred, long after the acute injury, and may be the result of secondary changes due to reorganization of damaged circuits of the somatosensory system. CNP occurs at and below the spinal cord lesion level, and can persist for years, decades or throughout the patient's life. As with neuropathic pain from other etiologies, the most frequently-used medications for its treatment in NMOSD are anti-epileptics, antidepressants and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Descriptive studies in NMOSD recognized the inadequate effect of these medications, resulting in frequent breakthrough opioid use. Furthermore, side effects from these medications, particularly at higher doses, are independently associated with fatigue. Scrambler is a type of transcutaneous electrostimulation (TENS) that uses peripheral nerve stimulation to modify ascending sensory responses in the spinal cord. Electrical impulses are transmitted via surface electrodes placed surrounding the pain area. Traditional TENS units take advantage of the Gate Control Theory in which stimulation of surrounding A-delta fibers dampens incoming pain signals. Scrambler therapy provides additional stimulation of ascending sensory C fibers that imitate normal nerve action potentials with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. The theory behind Scrambler treatment is that scrambled waveforms - instead of repetitive identical waveforms in traditional TENS - are dynamically assembled into strings of information that are interpreted by the brain to replace pain with no-pain information. In contrast to traditional TENS therapy that provides only short term pain relief, studies with Scrambler therapy in peripheral neuropathy suggest that patients can have significantly reduced pain or be pain-free for up to 3 months following a series of treatments, and that follow-up treatments may require fewer sessions for continued relief. This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 & 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Interventions

DEVICEScrambler

Scrambler is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of nociceptive fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways which has been investigated for treatment of peripheral neuropathy.

DEVICEScrambler Sham Control

Sham control should be indistinguishable to the participants from experimental Scrambler therapy.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be 18 years of age or older * Have the presence of persistent CNP rated at a level of 4 or higher on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS); persistent pain is defined as presence for \>3 months * Patients must be stable in their disease, such that they have had no spinal cord relapses with the last 6 months * Patients may use any combination of standard of care medications for pain treatment, to include anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, with no adjustments to the regimen within 30 days of enrollment. * Aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-antibody positive or negative, or untested, but otherwise meeting criteria for diagnosis of NMOSD.

Exclusion criteria

* A concomitant diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy * An ongoing concomitant central neurologic disorder * Pain that is referable to a spinal cord lesion that starts above the 4th vertebral disc of the cervical spinal cord because FDA device clearance allows for treatment below the neck * Use of an investigational agent for pain control within 30 days of enrollment * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Those with cognitive or mental incompetency * Patients with implantable devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question10 daysWill be determined by how many participants say yes to the following question, Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits10 daysAdherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain LevelBaseline, 10 daysChange in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being No pain and 10 being Worst pain) will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Scrambler
This arm will receive the Scrambler intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days. Scrambler: Scrambler is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of nociceptive fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways which has been investigated for treatment of peripheral neuropathy.
11
Sham-Control
This arm will receive the Sham-Control intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days. Scrambler Sham Control: Sham control should be indistinguishable to the participants from experimental Scrambler therapy.
11
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicScramblerSham-ControlTotal
Age, Continuous
Mean
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Aquaporin-4 Antibody Seropositive11 participants11 participants22 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 113 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question

Will be determined by how many participants say yes to the following question, Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?

Time frame: 10 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ScramblerAcceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question7 Participants
Sham-ControlAcceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question5 Participants
Primary

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits

Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.

Time frame: 10 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ScramblerFeasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits11 Participants
Sham-ControlFeasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits9 Participants
Secondary

Change in Pain Level

Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being No pain and 10 being Worst pain) will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, 10 days

Population: Scrambler pre/post compared to sham pre/post using Wilcoxian signed rank

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ScramblerChange in Pain Level5.0 score on a scale
Sham-ControlChange in Pain Level1.5 score on a scale
Sham PreChange in Pain Level5.0 score on a scale
Sham PostChange in Pain Level4.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Pain Level

Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being No pain and 10 being Worst pain) will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ScramblerChange in Pain Level4.5 score on a scale
Sham-ControlChange in Pain Level5.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Pain Level

Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being No pain and 10 being Worst pain) will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ScramblerChange in Pain Level4.5 score on a scale
Sham-ControlChange in Pain Level5.0 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026