Skip to content

Effect of Inguinal Hernia Repair on Uroflowmetric Parameteres

Does the Inguinal Hernia Repair Affect Uroflowmetric Values? A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03450811
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-03-01
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2018-03-01
Last updated
2018-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Urinary Retention

Keywords

complication, uroflowmetry

Brief summary

Post operative acute urinary retension or voiding dysfunction are complications after inguinal hernia repair and they cause a great deal of discomfort and stress to patients. Furthermore, they can also increase hospital costs by increasing hospital stay, and by growing the need for outpatient appointments after an elective surgical procedure. Some studies recommend prophylactic alpha blockers to minimizing these adverse effects. Investigators aimed to determine the changes of uroflowmetric values for male patients following elective inguinal hernia repair.

Detailed description

Inguinal hernia repair is a common procedure performed in general surgery, with an annual rate of 28 per 100,000 of the population in the USA. The incidence of post operative inability voiding in males following open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair varies from 3 to 25%. Evaluating risk factors to reduce the occurence of this complications after one of the most commonly performed surgery by general surgeons could help reduce that high rate of that complication. Although some authors recommend prophylactic alpha blockers, there is no consensus on whether these can decrease rate of urinary retention or voiding dysfunction in male patients. In current study, investigators aimed to determinate the uroflowmetric parametric changes of patients after elective inguinal hernia repair.

Interventions

PROCEDUREInguinal hernia repair

Lichtenstein procedure or laparoscopic method (Total extraperitoneal) inguinal hernia repair

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, Turkey
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The control group consisted of volunteer participitants who were admitted to the outpatient clinics with various reasons or healthy persons

Intervention model description

The patients who underwent elective open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were treated by a single general surgeon.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* any type of inguinal hernia

Exclusion criteria

* active urinary tract infection, * previous BPH, neurological disease or significant systemic disease, * medications that could interfere voiding function * history of prostate, bladder or urethral surgery or traumatic urethral catheterisation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with undergoes inguinal hernia repair -related voiding dysfunction as assessed by uroflowmetry3 daysMaximum and average flow rate (ml/sn) were determinated on post-operative day 1

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026