Skip to content

Evaluation of the Pupil Dilation Reflex in Response to Noxious Stimulation in Anaesthetized Children. A Proof of Concept Trial

Evaluation of the Pupil Dilation Reflex (PDR) Using a Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) Stimulation Protocol in Response to Noxious Stimulation in Anaesthetized Children. A Proof of Concept Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03449732
Acronym
Pain@OR-kids
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
2018-03-30
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Monitoring, Intraoperative, Pain

Brief summary

After conduction a pilot study, pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) is measured in response to nociceptive stimulation perioperatively in infants, children and adolescents.

Detailed description

An infrared camera of the video pupillometer measures the pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) in response to incremental nociceptive stimuli. The PDR is a robust reflex, even in patients under general anesthesia, and may provide a potential evaluation of the autonomous nociceptive circuit. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II patients from the age of 28 days till 18 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia are recruited. Enrolled patients perioperative undergo PDR measurement at 2 different standardized times (before and after opioid administration) generated by an inbuilt pupillary pain index (PPI) protocol. PPI, as a surrogate for nociception includes noxious stimulations from 10 up to 60 milli ampere (mA) until pupil dilation is larger than 13% from baseline diameter. Therefore, no inappropriate high stimulation is executed.

Interventions

PDR measurement at two standardized times perioperatively: 1. Anesthetized subject by sevoflurane sedation until a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of at least 1,5 is reached 2. Administration of fentanyl 2µg/kg, in the absence of adjustments in sedation depth

Sponsors

University Hospital, Antwerp
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Days to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled abdominal, urological or otorhinolaryngology surgery under general anaesthesia * ASA I-II

Exclusion criteria

* History of eye deformity, invasive ophthalmologic surgery * Known cranial nerve(s) deficit * Infection of the eye * Predicted difficult airway management (Paediatric Difficult Airway Guidelines - Difficult Airway Society) * Chronic opioid use (\>3 months) * Ongoing treatment with beta-blockers, dopamine antagonists, topical atropine * Preoperatively administrated benzodiazepins or antiemetics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stimulation IntensityDuring pupil measurements in the perioperative periodNecessary stimulation intensity to dilate the pupil more than 13%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood pressureDuring PDR measurementsHypertension as a common used parameter for perioperative nociceptive assessment defined as an increase in systolic blood pressure by \>10% of the initial systolic blood pressure
Heart rateDuring PDR measurementsTachycardia as a common used parameter for perioperative nociceptive assessment
Pupillary Pain Index scoreDuring pupil measurements in the perioperative periodDevice specific PPI score defined in accordance to stimulation intensity necessary for pupil dilation more than 13%

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026