Skip to content

Efficacy and Neural Mediators of Response to Trauma Management Therapy for PTSD

Efficacy and Neural Mediators of Response to Trauma Management Therapy for PTSD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03449576
Enrollment
69
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2022-07-01
Last updated
2024-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PTSD

Keywords

PTSD, neuroimaging, fMRI, veterans, exposure therapy, treatment

Brief summary

Social difficulties are serious and frequent complicating factors in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To better understand how treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder impacts neural mechanisms of social cognition, the investigators are examining behavior and brain processes associated with response to Trauma Management Therapy. Understanding the behavioral and neural impact of psychotherapy may contribute to development of more effective treatments for PTSD.

Detailed description

PTSD is associated with significant interpersonal difficulties that interfere with functioning. As such, this work is intended to evaluate the empirical support for a novel treatment that fills a significant gap in the treatment options available to Veterans with PTSD who suffer with interpersonal difficulties. In this study the investigators will (i) evaluate the efficacy of Trauma Management Therapy (TMT) for treating PTSD-related interpersonal dysfunction, as well as PTSD-related fear and anxiety, and (ii) evaluate neural mediators of clinical improvements associated with TMT. This work will provide insights into the mechanisms by which treatments may lead to improvements in social functioning, informing both the biological basis of psychotherapy and the development and refinement of alternative therapeutic interventions targeting social impairments. Treatment seeking Veterans with PTSD will be randomized to one of two treatments: (i) Trauma Management Therapy, consisting of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy followed by 24 sessions of group-based social and emotional rehabilitation, or (ii) Exposure + Comparison Treatment Group consisting of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy followed by 24 sessions of group-based psychotherapy. Veterans enrolled in both the TMT and EXP+GRP arms will undergo functional neuroimaging as they engage in an emotional image viewing task, as well as two social interaction tasks. Neurobehavioral assessments will be made prior to and following completion of treatment.

Interventions

Trauma Management Therapy (TMT) consists of a combination of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy and 24 sessions of group-based social and emotion rehabilitation.

OTHERExposure Therapy with Psychotherapy group

Exposure Therapy with Psychoeducation (EXP+EDU) consists of a combination of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy and 24 session of group-based psychoeducation.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female veterans of all ethnicities * Meet diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (assessed by study staff) * Fluent in English * Able to see computer display clearly * Able to provide informed consent * Able to follow written or verbal instructions

Exclusion criteria

* history of seizures * history of stroke * Cushing's syndrome * history of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury * electroconvulsive therapy within 5 years * history of chemotherapy for cancer * contraindications to fMRI * pregnancy * diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder and/or organic psychosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5CAPS-5 will be assessed at two time-points per participant: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Weathers et al. 2013; 2017) is a 20 item semi-structured instrument for the diagnosis and assessment of severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Each DSM-5 item is rated on a 0 (absent) to 4 (extreme/incapacitating) scale, and total score is calculated by summing severity scores across items. Total CAPS-5 severity can range from 0 to 80. \[edited 2/24/24: Higher scores mean a worse outcome.\]
Change in Social Adjustment Scale - Self-ReportSAS will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).The Social Adjustment Scale (SAS; Weissman & Bothwell, 1976) is a 54 item self-report measure that assesses social adjustment in six social areas of functioning including work, social and leisure activities, extended family, marital, parental, and family. Each item is rated on a five point scale, and within each of domain items are averaged. Thus, scores in each domain can range between 1 (high social adjustment) and 5 (low social adjustment). \[edited 2/24/24 Higher scores mean a worse outcome.\]
Change in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5The PCL-5 will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2013; Bovin et al., 2016) is a 20 item self-report measure assessing DSM-5 PTSD symptom severity. Each DSM-5 item is rated on a 0 (absent) to 4 (extreme/incapacitating) scale, and total score is calculated by summing severity scores across items. Total CAPS-5 severity can range from 0 to 80. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Aggression QuestionnaireAQ will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).Change in Aggression Questionnaire (AQ; Buss & Warren, 2000) is a 34 item self-report measure that assesses severity of self-perceived aggression and anger. Each item is rated on a 1 (Not at all like me) to 5 (Completely like me) scale, and scores of all items are summed. Scores can range from 34 to 170. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change in Interpersonal Trust ScaleITS will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).Change in Interpersonal Trust Scale (ITS; Rotter, 1967) is a 25 item self-report measure that assesses trust within relationships. Each item is rated on a 1 (low trust) to 5 (high trust) scale, and total scores can range from 25 to 125. \[edited 2/24/24: Higher scores mean a better outcome.\]

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Trauma Management Therapy
Trauma Management Therapy (TMT) consists of a combination of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy and 24 sessions of group-based social and emotion rehabilitation. Trauma Management Therapy: Trauma Management Therapy (TMT) consists of a combination of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy and 24 sessions of group-based social and emotion rehabilitation.
40
Exposure Therapy With Psychoeducation
Exposure Therapy with Psychoeducation (EXP+EDU) consists of a combination of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy and 24 session of group-based psychoeducation. Exposure Therapy with Psychotherapy group: Exposure Therapy with Psychoeducation (EXP+EDU) consists of a combination of 12 sessions of individualized exposure therapy and 24 session of group-based psychoeducation.
29
Total69

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExposure Therapy With PsychoeducationTotalTrauma Management Therapy
Age, Continuous43.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35
48.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49
51.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants64 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants25 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants38 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants20 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants49 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 400 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 401 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5

The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Weathers et al. 2013; 2017) is a 20 item semi-structured instrument for the diagnosis and assessment of severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Each DSM-5 item is rated on a 0 (absent) to 4 (extreme/incapacitating) scale, and total score is calculated by summing severity scores across items. Total CAPS-5 severity can range from 0 to 80. \[edited 2/24/24: Higher scores mean a worse outcome.\]

Time frame: CAPS-5 will be assessed at two time-points per participant: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).

Population: Data analysis at pre-treatment was limited to participants who had completed this measure. At post-treatment, analysis was limited to participants who had begun treatment and had completed this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5Post-treatment27.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.324715
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5Pre-treatment38.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.834358
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5Post-treatment29.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.813394
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5Pre-treatment35.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.76075
Comparison: Test of prediction of dependent variable -- the CAPS score-- with the interaction between Visit (pre/post) and treatment type (TMT vs. EXP+EDU), as well as independent variable, agep-value: 0.4154Regression, Linear
Primary

Change in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5

The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2013; Bovin et al., 2016) is a 20 item self-report measure assessing DSM-5 PTSD symptom severity. Each DSM-5 item is rated on a 0 (absent) to 4 (extreme/incapacitating) scale, and total score is calculated by summing severity scores across items. Total CAPS-5 severity can range from 0 to 80. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: The PCL-5 will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).

Population: Data analysis at pre-treatment was limited to participants who had completed this measure. At post-treatment, analysis was limited to participants who had begun treatment and had completed this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Trauma Management TherapyChange in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5Pre-treatment53.66 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.594175
Trauma Management TherapyChange in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5Post-treatment40.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.610813
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5Pre-treatment56.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.917909
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5Post-treatment46.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.15784
Comparison: Test of prediction of dependent variable -- the PCL score-- with the interaction between Visit (pre/post) and treatment type (TMT vs. EXP+EDU), as well as independent variable, agep-value: 0.735129Regression, Linear
Primary

Change in Social Adjustment Scale - Self-Report

The Social Adjustment Scale (SAS; Weissman & Bothwell, 1976) is a 54 item self-report measure that assesses social adjustment in six social areas of functioning including work, social and leisure activities, extended family, marital, parental, and family. Each item is rated on a five point scale, and within each of domain items are averaged. Thus, scores in each domain can range between 1 (high social adjustment) and 5 (low social adjustment). \[edited 2/24/24 Higher scores mean a worse outcome.\]

Time frame: SAS will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).

Population: Data analysis at pre-treatment was limited to participants who had completed this measure. At post-treatment, analysis was limited to participants who had begun treatment and had completed this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Social Adjustment Scale - Self-ReportPre-treatment2.855 mean score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1321421
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Social Adjustment Scale - Self-ReportPost-treatment2.953 mean score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1869682
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Social Adjustment Scale - Self-ReportPre-treatment3.168 mean score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1061295
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Social Adjustment Scale - Self-ReportPost-treatment3.289 mean score on a scaleStandard Error 0.125691
Comparison: Test of prediction of dependent variable -- the SAS-SR score-- with the interaction between Visit (pre/post) and Treatment type (TMT vs. EXP+EDU), as well as independent variable, agep-value: 0.4636Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Aggression Questionnaire

Change in Aggression Questionnaire (AQ; Buss & Warren, 2000) is a 34 item self-report measure that assesses severity of self-perceived aggression and anger. Each item is rated on a 1 (Not at all like me) to 5 (Completely like me) scale, and scores of all items are summed. Scores can range from 34 to 170. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: AQ will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).

Population: Data analysis at pre-treatment was limited to participants who had completed this measure. At post-treatment, analysis was limited to participants who had begun treatment and had completed this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Aggression QuestionnairePre-treatment59 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83896
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Aggression QuestionnairePost-treatment58.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.066746
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Aggression QuestionnairePost-treatment62.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.193785
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Aggression QuestionnairePre-treatment64.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.715036
Comparison: Test of prediction of dependent variable -- the AQ score-- with the interaction between Visit (pre/post) and treatment type (TMT vs. EXP+EDU), as well as independent variable, agep-value: 0.58Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Interpersonal Trust Scale

Change in Interpersonal Trust Scale (ITS; Rotter, 1967) is a 25 item self-report measure that assesses trust within relationships. Each item is rated on a 1 (low trust) to 5 (high trust) scale, and total scores can range from 25 to 125. \[edited 2/24/24: Higher scores mean a better outcome.\]

Time frame: ITS will be assessed at two time-points: before starting treatment i.e. pre-treatment (week 0) and at completion of treatment, i.e. post-treatment (week 8).

Population: Data analysis at pre-treatment was limited to participants who had completed this measure. At post-treatment, analysis was limited to participants who had begun treatment and had completed this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Interpersonal Trust ScalePre-treatment60.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.266907
Trauma Management TherapyChange in Interpersonal Trust ScalePost-treatment63.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.491774
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Interpersonal Trust ScalePre-treatment57.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.917671
Exposure Therapy With PsychoeducationChange in Interpersonal Trust ScalePost-treatment60.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.027533
Comparison: Test of prediction of dependent variable -- the ITS score-- with the interaction between Visit (pre/post) and treatment type (TMT vs. EXP+EDU), as well as independent variable, agep-value: 0.808Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026