Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol; Harmful Use, Alcohol Intoxication, Alcoholism, Alcohol Use Disorder, Binge Drinking
Conditions
Brief summary
In this study, the investigators examine whether emotional and social reward from alcohol varies depending on the social context of consumption.
Detailed description
Objective: Although the vast majority of alcohol consumption outside the laboratory occurs in social context, experimental studies of alcohol's emotionally reinforcing effects have overwhelmingly examined individuals drinking in isolation. The current study examines motivationally salient elements of everyday social drinking contexts as moderators of alcohol-related reinforcement. More specifically, the present study examine whether alcohol is more reinforcing within the context of unfamiliar vs. familiar social interaction and, further, whether alcohol is more reinforcing within the context of low vs. high quality social relationships. The current study furthermore examine whether individuals with characteristics that put them at risk for developing an alcohol use disorder (e.g., male gender, impulsive/extraverted personality profile, heavy patterns of consumption, family history of AUD, ...) exhibit heightened emotional reinforcement from alcohol within these social drinking contexts. The current project represents a test of competing theories of alcohol reinforcement. Alcohol myopia theory-which has heretofore represented the most prominent theory of alcohol's effects-predicts that alcohol's ability to relieve stress depends on the nature (positive or negative) of stimuli in the drinker's immediate environment. Alcohol myopia theory might thus predict that alcohol's rewarding effects will be larger within familiar interactions and within secure relationships. In contrast, the social attributional theory of alcohol reinforcement predicts that alcohol-related reinforcement will be most pronounced within the context of unfamiliar social interactions. In addition to providing an opportunity to test contextual and individual-level moderators of alcohol reinforcement, the current study represents an opportunity to directly test the replicability of research indicating a pronounced reinforcing effect of alcohol specifically within interactions among unfamiliar individuals (Sayette et al., 2012; Fairbairn et al., 2013). Study Population: Participants will consist of 640 male and female drinkers, aged 21-30, with no reported history of severe alcohol use disorder. Participants will be sampled such that at least 360 of these participants will classify as heavy drinkers. Design: In the laboratory arm of the study, individuals will be randomly assigned to consume either a moderate dose of alcohol or a control beverage in the company of either familiar or unfamiliar individuals. Of these individuals, a subset will participate in additional tasks post beverage-consumption including a hyperscanning EEG task, while an additional subset will also participate in an ambulatory assessment period over the course of several weeks to examine the interaction of alcohol and social contextual factors in daily life. In the ambulatory study arm, participants will wear transdermal sensors to assess BAC and will further provide information about their mood and their social contexts in response to random prompts. Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures include self-reports of positive and negative mood and perceived social reinforcement. The investigators will also examine facial expressions using the Facial Action Coding System, a comprehensive, anatomically-based system for categorizing facial muscle movement. One aim of the current study is to examine whether differential reinforcement from alcohol in unfamiliar social contexts emerges only with respect to self-reports, or is also observable within facial behaviors. EEG/ERP measures will also be examined for a subset of participants engaged in a hyperscanning task.
Interventions
Alcohol Target BAC .08%
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Between the ages of 21 and 30 * Currently drinks alcohol * Able to provide at least 2 same-gender friend referrals
Exclusion criteria
* Female participant is pregnant or trying to become pregnant * Endorsed medical disorder caused by, or made worse by, alcohol * History of severe alcohol problems * Use of drugs known to interact with alcohol
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Reported Emotion | during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours | Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure. This measure yields two subscales (positive emotion; negative emotion) each ranges from 1 to 6. For positive mood, higher value represents increased alcohol reward. For negative mood, lower value represents increased alcohol reward. |
| Self-Reported Social Reinforcement | during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours | Social reinforcement will be assessed using an index of perceived social closeness as well as a modified version of the Perceived Group Reinforcement Scale. The score of the scale ranges from 1 to 9. Higher score indicates increased alcohol reward. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Social Bonding | 1 day (laboratory session) | Social bonding will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session. This will be assessed by examining the synchronization among group members of facial expressions of emotion. |
| Self-Reported Emotion | 2-3 week ambulatory assessment period | Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the ambulatory assessment period via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure. |
| Interpersonal Distance | 1 day (laboratory session) | Physical proximity to other participants during the experiment |
| Neuro-cognitive Social Engagement | 1 day (laboratory session) | Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning methods will be employed to assess task engagement and social attention, including through the examination of event-related potentials (ERPs) during social tasks. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Alcohol Administration Primary participants in the current study consisted of both eligible individuals who first contacted the lab and their eligible friends. Here we report the data from individual participants (both initial contacts and their friends) who received a moderate dose of alcohol (Target BAC .08%). | 320 |
| Control Beverage Administration Primary participants in the current study consisted of both eligible individuals who first contacted the lab and their eligible friends. Here we report the data from individual participants (both initial contacts and their friends) who received a non-alcoholic beverage. | 320 |
| Total | 640 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 22.63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.923 | 22.74 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.101 | 22.69 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.013 |
| Education level | 16.08 Years of Education STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.716 | 16.09 Years of Education STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.741 | 16.08 Years of Education STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.727 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 66 Participants | 68 Participants | 134 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 254 Participants | 252 Participants | 506 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 110 Participants | 129 Participants | 239 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 180 Participants | 164 Participants | 344 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 320 participants | 320 participants | 640 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 160 Participants | 160 Participants | 320 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 160 Participants | 160 Participants | 320 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 320 | 0 / 320 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 320 | 0 / 320 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 320 | 0 / 320 |
Outcome results
Self-Reported Emotion
Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure. This measure yields two subscales (positive emotion; negative emotion) each ranges from 1 to 6. For positive mood, higher value represents increased alcohol reward. For negative mood, lower value represents increased alcohol reward.
Time frame: during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol Administration | Self-Reported Emotion | Positive Emotion | 3.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.085 |
| Alcohol Administration | Self-Reported Emotion | Negative Emotion | 0.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.447 |
| Control Beverage Administration | Self-Reported Emotion | Positive Emotion | 2.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.101 |
| Control Beverage Administration | Self-Reported Emotion | Negative Emotion | 0.673 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
Self-Reported Social Reinforcement
Social reinforcement will be assessed using an index of perceived social closeness as well as a modified version of the Perceived Group Reinforcement Scale. The score of the scale ranges from 1 to 9. Higher score indicates increased alcohol reward.
Time frame: during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol Administration | Self-Reported Social Reinforcement | 7.471 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.129 |
| Control Beverage Administration | Self-Reported Social Reinforcement | 7.180 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.155 |
Interpersonal Distance
Physical proximity to other participants during the experiment
Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)
Neuro-cognitive Social Engagement
Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning methods will be employed to assess task engagement and social attention, including through the examination of event-related potentials (ERPs) during social tasks.
Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)
Self-Reported Emotion
Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the ambulatory assessment period via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure.
Time frame: 2-3 week ambulatory assessment period
Social Bonding
Social bonding will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session. This will be assessed by examining the synchronization among group members of facial expressions of emotion.
Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)