Skip to content

Understanding Alcohol Reward in Social Context

Examining the Impact of Stress on the Emotionally Reinforcing Properties of Alcohol in Heavy Social Drinkers: A Multimodal Investigation Integrating Laboratory and Ambulatory Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03449095
Enrollment
640
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
2017-11-04
Completion date
2023-07-05
Last updated
2024-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol; Harmful Use, Alcohol Intoxication, Alcoholism, Alcohol Use Disorder, Binge Drinking

Brief summary

In this study, the investigators examine whether emotional and social reward from alcohol varies depending on the social context of consumption.

Detailed description

Objective: Although the vast majority of alcohol consumption outside the laboratory occurs in social context, experimental studies of alcohol's emotionally reinforcing effects have overwhelmingly examined individuals drinking in isolation. The current study examines motivationally salient elements of everyday social drinking contexts as moderators of alcohol-related reinforcement. More specifically, the present study examine whether alcohol is more reinforcing within the context of unfamiliar vs. familiar social interaction and, further, whether alcohol is more reinforcing within the context of low vs. high quality social relationships. The current study furthermore examine whether individuals with characteristics that put them at risk for developing an alcohol use disorder (e.g., male gender, impulsive/extraverted personality profile, heavy patterns of consumption, family history of AUD, ...) exhibit heightened emotional reinforcement from alcohol within these social drinking contexts. The current project represents a test of competing theories of alcohol reinforcement. Alcohol myopia theory-which has heretofore represented the most prominent theory of alcohol's effects-predicts that alcohol's ability to relieve stress depends on the nature (positive or negative) of stimuli in the drinker's immediate environment. Alcohol myopia theory might thus predict that alcohol's rewarding effects will be larger within familiar interactions and within secure relationships. In contrast, the social attributional theory of alcohol reinforcement predicts that alcohol-related reinforcement will be most pronounced within the context of unfamiliar social interactions. In addition to providing an opportunity to test contextual and individual-level moderators of alcohol reinforcement, the current study represents an opportunity to directly test the replicability of research indicating a pronounced reinforcing effect of alcohol specifically within interactions among unfamiliar individuals (Sayette et al., 2012; Fairbairn et al., 2013). Study Population: Participants will consist of 640 male and female drinkers, aged 21-30, with no reported history of severe alcohol use disorder. Participants will be sampled such that at least 360 of these participants will classify as heavy drinkers. Design: In the laboratory arm of the study, individuals will be randomly assigned to consume either a moderate dose of alcohol or a control beverage in the company of either familiar or unfamiliar individuals. Of these individuals, a subset will participate in additional tasks post beverage-consumption including a hyperscanning EEG task, while an additional subset will also participate in an ambulatory assessment period over the course of several weeks to examine the interaction of alcohol and social contextual factors in daily life. In the ambulatory study arm, participants will wear transdermal sensors to assess BAC and will further provide information about their mood and their social contexts in response to random prompts. Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures include self-reports of positive and negative mood and perceived social reinforcement. The investigators will also examine facial expressions using the Facial Action Coding System, a comprehensive, anatomically-based system for categorizing facial muscle movement. One aim of the current study is to examine whether differential reinforcement from alcohol in unfamiliar social contexts emerges only with respect to self-reports, or is also observable within facial behaviors. EEG/ERP measures will also be examined for a subset of participants engaged in a hyperscanning task.

Interventions

DRUGAlcohol

Alcohol Target BAC .08%

Sponsors

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Between the ages of 21 and 30 * Currently drinks alcohol * Able to provide at least 2 same-gender friend referrals

Exclusion criteria

* Female participant is pregnant or trying to become pregnant * Endorsed medical disorder caused by, or made worse by, alcohol * History of severe alcohol problems * Use of drugs known to interact with alcohol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Reported Emotionduring the laboratory session, up to 9 hoursPositive and negative emotion will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure. This measure yields two subscales (positive emotion; negative emotion) each ranges from 1 to 6. For positive mood, higher value represents increased alcohol reward. For negative mood, lower value represents increased alcohol reward.
Self-Reported Social Reinforcementduring the laboratory session, up to 9 hoursSocial reinforcement will be assessed using an index of perceived social closeness as well as a modified version of the Perceived Group Reinforcement Scale. The score of the scale ranges from 1 to 9. Higher score indicates increased alcohol reward.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Social Bonding1 day (laboratory session)Social bonding will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session. This will be assessed by examining the synchronization among group members of facial expressions of emotion.
Self-Reported Emotion2-3 week ambulatory assessment periodPositive and negative emotion will be assessed during the ambulatory assessment period via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure.
Interpersonal Distance1 day (laboratory session)Physical proximity to other participants during the experiment
Neuro-cognitive Social Engagement1 day (laboratory session)Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning methods will be employed to assess task engagement and social attention, including through the examination of event-related potentials (ERPs) during social tasks.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alcohol Administration
Primary participants in the current study consisted of both eligible individuals who first contacted the lab and their eligible friends. Here we report the data from individual participants (both initial contacts and their friends) who received a moderate dose of alcohol (Target BAC .08%).
320
Control Beverage Administration
Primary participants in the current study consisted of both eligible individuals who first contacted the lab and their eligible friends. Here we report the data from individual participants (both initial contacts and their friends) who received a non-alcoholic beverage.
320
Total640

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlcohol AdministrationControl Beverage AdministrationTotal
Age, Continuous22.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.923
22.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.101
22.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.013
Education level16.08 Years of Education
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.716
16.09 Years of Education
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.741
16.08 Years of Education
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.727
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants68 Participants134 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
254 Participants252 Participants506 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
110 Participants129 Participants239 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
180 Participants164 Participants344 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
320 participants320 participants640 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
160 Participants160 Participants320 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
160 Participants160 Participants320 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3200 / 320
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3200 / 320
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3200 / 320

Outcome results

Primary

Self-Reported Emotion

Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure. This measure yields two subscales (positive emotion; negative emotion) each ranges from 1 to 6. For positive mood, higher value represents increased alcohol reward. For negative mood, lower value represents increased alcohol reward.

Time frame: during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alcohol AdministrationSelf-Reported EmotionPositive Emotion3.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.085
Alcohol AdministrationSelf-Reported EmotionNegative Emotion0.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.447
Control Beverage AdministrationSelf-Reported EmotionPositive Emotion2.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.101
Control Beverage AdministrationSelf-Reported EmotionNegative Emotion0.673 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Primary

Self-Reported Social Reinforcement

Social reinforcement will be assessed using an index of perceived social closeness as well as a modified version of the Perceived Group Reinforcement Scale. The score of the scale ranges from 1 to 9. Higher score indicates increased alcohol reward.

Time frame: during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alcohol AdministrationSelf-Reported Social Reinforcement7.471 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.129
Control Beverage AdministrationSelf-Reported Social Reinforcement7.180 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.155
p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Interpersonal Distance

Physical proximity to other participants during the experiment

Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)

Secondary

Neuro-cognitive Social Engagement

Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning methods will be employed to assess task engagement and social attention, including through the examination of event-related potentials (ERPs) during social tasks.

Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)

Secondary

Self-Reported Emotion

Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the ambulatory assessment period via self-report on the 8-item Mood Measure.

Time frame: 2-3 week ambulatory assessment period

Secondary

Social Bonding

Social bonding will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session. This will be assessed by examining the synchronization among group members of facial expressions of emotion.

Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026