Skip to content

Cardiovascular Risk Comparison Between Expanded Hemodialysis Using Theranova and On-line Hemodiafiltration

Cardiovascular Risk Comparison Between Expanded Hemodialysis Using Theranova and On-line Hemodiafiltration - Exploratory, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03448887
Acronym
CARTOON
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
2018-03-15
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2020-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Chronic, Renal Dialysis

Keywords

End-stage renal disease, Medium cut-off dialyzer, Hemodiafiltration, Cardiovascular, Pulse wave velocity

Brief summary

Theranova is a novel medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer. Previous studies identified that theranova dialyzer had superior performance on middle molecule removal to conventional hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). The present study addresses to compare clinical outcomes including cardiovascular endpoint between HD with theranova dialyzer and HDF.

Detailed description

While conventional hemodialysis (HD) modality effectively removes small-sized molecules, performance with middle-sized and protein-bound molecules is not well established. With increasing perception on importance of middle molecule removal, on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) is getting more attention from healthcare professionals. However, HDF has not been widely used in Korea due to its technical burden and limited public funding issue. Novel medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer, Theranova, is available in Korea, which showed superior performance on middle molecule removal to conventional HD and HDF from the previous study. This new dialyzer can be a good alternative option replacing conventional HD or even HDF with its benefits. However, current data available on the MCP dialyzer has certain limitations such as small sample size, no Asian subject included, limited types of biomarkers, and no clinical outcomes (particularly cardiovascular diseases) included. With this respect, performance comparison of MCO dialyzer with HDF in terms of clinical outcomes, including cardiovascular endpoint would fill the exiting data gap, which is absolutely important to make a clinical decision on dialysis modality.

Interventions

DEVICETheranova

Extended HD with theranova

Online hemodiafiltration

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Exploratory, Multicenter, Randomized

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years old and older * Hemodialysis more than 3 months because of end-stage renal disease * Consent to the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Already receiving online hemodiafiltration before study enrollment * Dialysis schedule other than three times per week (e.g., once per week) * Receiving concurrent peritoneal dialysis * Having a plan to receive kidney transplantation within 1 year * Having multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy * Having advanced or active malignancy * Having a plan to be pregnant or being pregnant / breast-feeding or not having a plan to use contraception * Participating in other clinical trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in cardiovascular surrogate marker0, 6, 12 monthsBrachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (m/s)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in cardiac surrogate marker #20, 6, 12 monthsEchocardiography: ejection fraction (%); E/e' ratio (cm/s per cm/s); LVMI (g/m2).
Change in cardiovascular biomarkers #10, 6, 12 monthsPlasma levels of BNP (pg/ml)
Change in cardiovascular biomarkers #20, 6, 12 monthsPlasma levels of NT-proBNP (pg/ml)
Change in cardiovascular biomarkers #30, 6, 12 monthsPlasma levels of hsCRP (mg/dl)
Change in cardiovascular biomarkers #40, 6, 12 monthsPlasma levels of troponin-I (ng/ml)
Change in cardiac surrogate marker #10, 6, 12 monthsCT coronary calcium scoring (score)
Change in cardiovascular biomarkers #60, 6, 12 monthsPlasma levels of IL-6 (pg/ml)
Patient-reported outcomes #10, 6, 12 monthsDialysis symptom index (score)
Patient-reported outcomes #20, 6, 12 monthsDegree of fatigue after dialysis (scale from 0 to 10)
Patient-reported outcomes #30, 6, 12 monthsPost-dialysis recovery time (within minutes, when arriving home, at bed time, next morning, by next dialysis)
Change in cardiovascular biomarkers #50, 6, 12 monthsPlasma levels of troponin-T (ng/ml)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026