Skip to content

To Compare Efficacy and Safety of Lactulose Versus Polyethylene Glycol for Treatment of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhotics.

To Compare Efficacy and Safety of Lactulose Versus Polyethylene Glycol for Treatment of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhotics: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03448770
Enrollment
110
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2018-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cirrhosis

Brief summary

All patients presenting to the emergency department of Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences with known cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy with grade II will be included in the study. The patient will be randomized into one of the two arms of lactulose or polyethylene glycol. The patient on the lactulose arm will be administered 20 to 30 g of lactulose orally or by nasogastric tube (3 or more doses within 24 hours ) or if oral intake was not possible or inadequate. The Dose will be repeated to ensure 3-4 loose motions per day. The Polyethylene Glycol group will get 17 gm of PEG (Polyethylene Glycol) administered orally or via nasogastric tube. PEG (Polyethylene Glycol)will be administered in 3-4 doses in 24 hours to ensure 3-4 loose stools per day.

Interventions

DRUGPEG- 17 gm sachet

PEG- 17 gm sachet 3-4 times per day

DRUGLactulose : 20-30gm

Lactulose : 20-30gm

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Documented cirrhosis with any underlying etiology 2. Hepatic encephalopathy of grade II and above 3. 18 to 65 years of age

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute change in mental status due to a diagnosis other than hepatic encephalopathy 2. Patients who have received lactulose as an anticoma measure before enrollment 3. Patient who have developed encephalopathy post bleed 4. Patients with gut paralysis 5. Patients with tense ascites 6. Patients with altered sensorium due to organic brain disease. 7. Patients with coexistent psychiatric illness that may hamper the proper assessment of hepatic encephalopathy 8. Hemodynamic instability obviating vasopressors for resuscitation 9. Acute liver failure defined as severe acute liver injury with encephalopathy and international normalized ratio (INR)≥1.5 in a patient without pre-existing liver disease 10. Refusal of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete reversal of hepatic encephalopathy in both groups.3 daysComplete reversal is defined as Grade 0 Encephalopathy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of Intensive Care Unit stay in both groups28 days
Improvement in hepatic encephalopathy by two grades in both groups3 days
Adverse events in both groups3 days
Presence of encephalopathy changes in Electroencephalography in both groups3 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Abhinav Verma, MD
abhinav.3183@gmail.com01146300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026