Skip to content

This Study Tests Empagliflozin in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). The Study Looks at How Far Patients Can Walk in 6 Minutes and at Their Heart Failure Symptoms

A Phase III Randomised, Double-blind Trial to Evaluate the Effect of 12 Weeks Treatment of Once Daily EMPagliflozin 10 mg Compared With Placebo on ExeRcise Ability and Heart Failure Symptoms, In Patients With Chronic HeArt FaiLure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (EMPERIAL-reduced)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03448419
Enrollment
312
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
2019-10-07
Last updated
2020-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin 10 mg versus placebo on exercise ability using the 6 minute walk test in patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) Secondary objectives are to assess Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)

Interventions

DRUGEmpagliflozin

Film-coated tablet

DRUGPlacebo

Film-coated tablet

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Of full age of consent (according to local legislation, usually ≥ 18 years) at screening. * Male or female patients. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)1 must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the patient information. * Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with ICHGCP and local legislation prior to admission to the trial * 6MWT distance ≤350 m at screening and at baseline. * Patients with chronic HF diagnosed for at least 3 months before Visit 1 and currently in NYHA class II-IV * Chronic HF with reduced EF defined as LVEF ≤ 40 % as per echocardiography at Visit 1 as per local reading (obtained under stable condition). * Elevated NT-proBNP \> 450 pg/ml for patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) OR NTproBNP \> 600 pg/ml for patients with AF as analysed at the Central laboratory at Visit 1 * Patients must be clinically stable and on appropriate and stable dose of medical therapy for HF (such as ACEi, ARB, β-blocker, oral diuretics, MRA, ARNI, ivabradine), consistent with prevailing CV guidelines, stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1(screening) with the exception of diuretics which must have been stable for at least two weeks prior to Visit 1. The investigator must document the reason in case the patient is not on such medication or if not on target dose of any heart failure medication as per local guidelines. * Clinically stable at randomization with no signs of heart failure decompensation (as per investigator judgement). * Appropriate use of medical devices such as cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) consistent with prevailing local or international CV guidelines, and if a device is required, it must have been implanted for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 for CRT and 1 month prior to visit 1 for ICD.

Exclusion criteria

* Myocardial infarction (increase in cardiac enzymes in combination with symptoms of ischaemia or newly developed ischaemic ECG changes), coronary artery bypass graft surgery or other major cardiovascular surgery, stroke or TIA in past 90 days prior to Visit 1 * Acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF) requiring intravenous (i.v.) diuretics, i.v. inotropes or i.v. vasodilators, or left ventricular assist device within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1, and/or during screening period until Visit 2 * Previous or current randomisation in another Empagliflozin Heart Failure trial (i.e. studies 1245.110, 1245.121, 1245-0167) * Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) * Impaired renal function, defined as eGFR \< 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPIcr) or requiring dialysis, as determined at Visit 1 * Symptomatic hypotension or a SBP \< 100 mmHg at Visit 1 or 2 * Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 180 mmHg at Visit 1 or 2, or SBP \>160mmHg at both Visit 1 and 2 * Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with a resting heart rate \>110 bpm documented by ECG at Visit 1 (Screening) * Unstable angina pectoris in past 30 days prior to Visit 1 * Largest distance walked in 6 minutes (6MWTD) at baseline \<100m. * Any presence of condition that precludes exercise testing such as: * claudication, * uncontrolled (according to investigator judgement) bradyarrhythmia or tachyarrhythmia, * significant musculoskeletal disease, * primary pulmonary hypertension, * severe obesity (body mass index ≥40.0 kg/m2), * orthopedic conditions that limit the ability to walk (such as arthritis in the leg, knee or hip injuries) * amputation with artificial limb without stable prosthesis function for the past 3 months * Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate the assessment of 6MWT * Patients in a structured (according to Investigator judgement) exercise training program in the 1 month prior to screening or planned to start one during the course of this trial. * Planned implantation of ICD or CRT during the course of the trial. * Treatment with i.v. iron therapy or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to screening * Treatment with i.v. iron therapy or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to screening * Further

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) DistanceAt baseline and at week 12Change from baseline to week 12 in exercise capacity as measured by the distance walked in 6 minutes in standardised conditions. If repeated 6MWT measurements were available for the same day, the longest distance was used for analysis. Change from baseline was defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes at week 12 minus the baseline value. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. If a participant was present at the visit at week 12 but did not perform the 6MWT, the participant was evaluated as having walked a distance of 0 meter. If no value was available for week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire Self- Administered Standardized Format (CHQ-SAS) Dyspnea ScoreAt baseline and at week 12Change from baseline in CHQ-SAS was defined as the endpoint value at week 12 minus the last available endpoint value before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The CHQ-SAS evaluates 3 domains: dyspnoea, fatigue, and emotional function. Scores of the domains range from 1 to 7, with higher score indicating better quality of life. If no questionnaire was available at week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above. If no questionnaire was available at baseline, change from baseline was not imputed.
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) DistanceAt baseline and at week 6Change from baseline to week 6 in exercise capacity as measured by the distance walked in 6 minutes in standardised conditions. Change from baseline was defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes at week 6 minus the baseline value. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. If a participant was present at the visit at week 6 but did not perform the 6MWT, the participant was evaluated as having walked a distance of 0 meter. If no value was available for week 6, an imputed value was used.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Clinical Congestion ScoreAt baseline and at week 12Change from baseline to week 12 in Clinical Congestion score is defined as the score-value at week 12 minus the score-value at baseline. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The Clinical Congestion Score (summary score) is based on 3 items: orthopnoea, jugular venous distention (JVD) and oedema. Each item was assessed through a 4-measure questionnaire, which was further converted to a standardised 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no or fewer symptoms and 3 indicating continous or more symptoms. If at least 2 of the 3 items are not missing, the summary score is calculated as: (average over items JVD, orthopnea and oedema actually answered)\*3. The summary score range from 0 to 9, with lower value indicating better health, and higher value indicating worse health. Mean is adjusted mean.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure SymptomsAt baseline and at week 12Change from baseline to week 12 in PGI-S of Heart Failure Symptoms. The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the patient's impression of symptoms severity, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue and swelling. The PGI-S asks the Patient to choose one response that best describes how his/her heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue and swelling are now on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'Not at all' (1) to 'Very severe' (5). Number of participants by change in score are reported. Change in score was defined as the number of categories improved/deteriorated from baseline to week 12.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total Symptom Score (TSS)At baseline and at week 12Change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS was defined as the endpoint value at week 12 minus the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The KCCQ is 23 item self-administered questionnaire and comprises 7 domains: physical limitation, symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, social limitation, self-efficacy and quality of life. Additionally 3 summary scores exist: TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score. The scores of the KCCQ domains and summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better outcome. If no questionnaire was available at week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above. If no questionnaire was available at baseline, change from baseline was not imputed.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12At week 12The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the patient's impression of change in heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling. The PGI-C asks the patient to choose one Response that best describes the overall change (if any) in his/her heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling since he/she started taking the study medication on a 7- category scale ranging from 'Very much better' (+3) to 'Very much worse' (-3).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12At week 12The PGI-C in Dyspnoea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's Impression of change in dyspnoea. The PGI-C asks the patient to choose one response that best describes the change (if any) in his/her shortness of breath when performing usual activities since he/she started taking the study medication on a 7-category scale ranging from 'Very much better' (+3) to 'Very much worse' (-3).
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 12 in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)Within 3 weeks prior to treatment start and at Week 12Relative change from baseline to week 12 in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Relative change from baseline is expressed as ratio of week 12 to baseline. Baseline value was defined as the mean of all available measurements from the screening visit until start of treatment with randomised study medication.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of DyspnoeaAt baseline and at week 12Change from baseline to week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of dyspnoea. The PGI-S of Dyspnoea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the participant´s impression of symptom severity, specifically dyspnoea. The PGI-S item asks the participant to choose one response that best describes how his/her dyspnoea is now on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'Not at all' (1) to 'Very severe' (5). Number of participants by change in score are reported. Change in score was defined as the number of categories improved/deteriorated from baseline to week 12.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in patients with chronic Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) to evaluate the effect of Empagliflozin versus Placebo on exercise and heart failure symptoms.

Pre-assignment details

Only subjects that met all the study inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were to be entered in the study. All subjects were free to withdraw from the clinical trial at any time for any reason given. Close monitoring of all subjects was adhered to throughout the trial conduct.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
1 film-coated tablet of Placebo matching empagliflozin was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks in participants with chronic Heart Failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤40%).
156
10 mg Empagliflozin
1 film-coated tablet of 10 milligram (mg) of Empagliflozin was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks in participants with chronic Heart Failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤40%).
156
Total312

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event109
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyNot treated01
Overall StudyPatient did not attend all visits02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject31
Overall StudyWithdrawn by Sponsor01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo10 mg EmpagliflozinTotal
Age, Continuous69.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
68.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
69.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants20 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
132 Participants136 Participants268 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Exercise capacity as measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) distance at baseline309.0 Meter306.0 Meter307.5 Meter
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants24 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
133 Participants130 Participants263 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants35 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
111 Participants121 Participants232 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1563 / 155
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1560 / 155
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 15621 / 155

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance

Change from baseline to week 12 in exercise capacity as measured by the distance walked in 6 minutes in standardised conditions. If repeated 6MWT measurements were available for the same day, the longest distance was used for analysis. Change from baseline was defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes at week 12 minus the baseline value. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. If a participant was present at the visit at week 12 but did not perform the 6MWT, the participant was evaluated as having walked a distance of 0 meter. If no value was available for week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

Population: Randomised Set: All participants that were randomised, regardless of whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance18.0 Meter (m)
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance13.5 Meter (m)
Comparison: H0: There is no difference between the effect of placebo and the effect of empagliflozin.p-value: 0.423695% CI: [-16, 6]Wilcoxon rank test, normal approximation
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire Self- Administered Standardized Format (CHQ-SAS) Dyspnea Score

Change from baseline in CHQ-SAS was defined as the endpoint value at week 12 minus the last available endpoint value before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The CHQ-SAS evaluates 3 domains: dyspnoea, fatigue, and emotional function. Scores of the domains range from 1 to 7, with higher score indicating better quality of life. If no questionnaire was available at week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above. If no questionnaire was available at baseline, change from baseline was not imputed.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

Population: Participants in the randomised set (RS) who have no missing values at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire Self- Administered Standardized Format (CHQ-SAS) Dyspnea Score0.40 Score on scale
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire Self- Administered Standardized Format (CHQ-SAS) Dyspnea Score0.40 Score on scale
Comparison: H0: There is no difference between the effect of placebo and the effect of empagliflozin.p-value: 0.470295% CI: [-0.2, 0.4]Wilcoxon rank test, normal approximation
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Clinical Congestion Score

Change from baseline to week 12 in Clinical Congestion score is defined as the score-value at week 12 minus the score-value at baseline. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The Clinical Congestion Score (summary score) is based on 3 items: orthopnoea, jugular venous distention (JVD) and oedema. Each item was assessed through a 4-measure questionnaire, which was further converted to a standardised 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no or fewer symptoms and 3 indicating continous or more symptoms. If at least 2 of the 3 items are not missing, the summary score is calculated as: (average over items JVD, orthopnea and oedema actually answered)\*3. The summary score range from 0 to 9, with lower value indicating better health, and higher value indicating worse health. Mean is adjusted mean.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

Population: Only participants in the randomised set (RS) who have baseline and at least one post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Clinical Congestion Score-0.30 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Clinical Congestion Score-0.61 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
p-value: 0.005395% CI: [-0.53, -0.09]Mixed Model repeated Measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total Symptom Score (TSS)

Change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS was defined as the endpoint value at week 12 minus the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The KCCQ is 23 item self-administered questionnaire and comprises 7 domains: physical limitation, symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, social limitation, self-efficacy and quality of life. Additionally 3 summary scores exist: TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score. The scores of the KCCQ domains and summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better outcome. If no questionnaire was available at week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above. If no questionnaire was available at baseline, change from baseline was not imputed.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

Population: Randomised Set: All participants that were randomised, regardless of whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total Symptom Score (TSS)3.65 Score on a scale
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total Symptom Score (TSS)7.29 Score on a scale
Comparison: H0: There is no difference between the effect of placebo and the effect of empagliflozin.p-value: 0.089395% CI: [0, 7.29]Wilcoxon rank test, normal approximation
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea

Change from baseline to week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of dyspnoea. The PGI-S of Dyspnoea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the participant´s impression of symptom severity, specifically dyspnoea. The PGI-S item asks the participant to choose one response that best describes how his/her dyspnoea is now on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'Not at all' (1) to 'Very severe' (5). Number of participants by change in score are reported. Change in score was defined as the number of categories improved/deteriorated from baseline to week 12.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

Population: Only participants in the randomised set (RS) who have values at baseline and at week 12.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea3 categories improvment2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea1 category deterioration17 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea1 category improvement46 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea2 categories deterioration4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea2 categories improvement11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea3 categories deterioration0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of DyspnoeaNo change70 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea4 categories deterioration0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea4 categories improvment0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea4 categories deterioration0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea4 categories improvment0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea3 categories improvment3 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea2 categories improvement8 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea1 category improvement38 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of DyspnoeaNo change83 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea1 category deterioration13 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea2 categories deterioration2 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea3 categories deterioration0 Participants
p-value: 0.6672Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms

Change from baseline to week 12 in PGI-S of Heart Failure Symptoms. The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the patient's impression of symptoms severity, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue and swelling. The PGI-S asks the Patient to choose one response that best describes how his/her heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue and swelling are now on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'Not at all' (1) to 'Very severe' (5). Number of participants by change in score are reported. Change in score was defined as the number of categories improved/deteriorated from baseline to week 12.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

Population: Only participants in the randomised set (RS) who have values at baseline and at week 12.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms3 categories improvement1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms1 category deterioration16 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms1 category improvement41 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms2 categories deterioration4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms2 categories improvement13 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms3 categories deterioration1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure SymptomsNo change73 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms4 categories deterioration0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms4 categories improvement0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms4 categories deterioration0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms4 categories improvement0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms3 categories improvement1 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms2 categories improvement14 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms1 category improvement41 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure SymptomsNo change74 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms1 category deterioration16 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms2 categories deterioration1 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms3 categories deterioration0 Participants
p-value: 0.6189Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance

Change from baseline to week 6 in exercise capacity as measured by the distance walked in 6 minutes in standardised conditions. Change from baseline was defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes at week 6 minus the baseline value. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. If a participant was present at the visit at week 6 but did not perform the 6MWT, the participant was evaluated as having walked a distance of 0 meter. If no value was available for week 6, an imputed value was used.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 6

Population: Randomised Set: All participants that were randomised, regardless of whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance7.0 Meter (m)
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance9.5 Meter (m)
Comparison: H0: There is no difference between the effect of placebo and the effect of empagliflozin.p-value: 0.98395% CI: [-9, 9]Wilcoxon rank test, normal approximation
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12

The PGI-C in Dyspnoea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's Impression of change in dyspnoea. The PGI-C asks the patient to choose one response that best describes the change (if any) in his/her shortness of breath when performing usual activities since he/she started taking the study medication on a 7-category scale ranging from 'Very much better' (+3) to 'Very much worse' (-3).

Time frame: At week 12

Population: Only participants in the randomised set (RS) who have week 12 value.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12A little worse6 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12A little better45 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Much worse2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Much better34 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12No change52 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Very much better10 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Very much worse0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Very much better6 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Very much worse0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Much worse0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12A little worse3 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12No change49 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12A little better59 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12Much better30 Participants
p-value: 0.863Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the patient's impression of change in heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling. The PGI-C asks the patient to choose one Response that best describes the overall change (if any) in his/her heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling since he/she started taking the study medication on a 7- category scale ranging from 'Very much better' (+3) to 'Very much worse' (-3).

Time frame: At week 12

Population: Only participants in the randomised set (RS) who have week 12 value.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12A little worse7 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12A little better40 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Much worse3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Much better34 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12No change57 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Very much better9 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Very much worse0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Very much better6 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Very much worse0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Much worse0 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12A little worse5 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12No change51 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12A little better52 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12Much better33 Participants
p-value: 0.5147Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Secondary

Relative Change From Baseline to Week 12 in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)

Relative change from baseline to week 12 in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Relative change from baseline is expressed as ratio of week 12 to baseline. Baseline value was defined as the mean of all available measurements from the screening visit until start of treatment with randomised study medication.

Time frame: Within 3 weeks prior to treatment start and at Week 12

Population: Only participants in the randomised set (RS) who have baseline and at least one baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboRelative Change From Baseline to Week 12 in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)0.98 Ratio
10 mg EmpagliflozinRelative Change From Baseline to Week 12 in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)0.89 Ratio
Comparison: The endpoint 'relative change from baseline in NT-proBNP at Week 12' (after log-transformation) was evaluated using an MMRM analysis over time with baseline log-transformed NT-proBNP-by-visit interaction and visit-by-treatment interaction as covariates.Unstructured covariance structure was used to model within-patient errors.p-value: 0.14195% CI: [0.81, 1.03]Mixed Model repeated Measures (MMRM)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026