Smoking
Conditions
Keywords
Behavioral intervention, Social intervention, Public health, Smoking behavior
Brief summary
This is a matched-pairs community randomized controlled trial (CRCT) to examine the impact of coalitions promoting smoke-free air policies on individual secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe). This proposal will build the capacity of Georgia (GE) and Armenia (AM) researchers to conduct high-quality mixed methods tobacco research and test the Community Coalition Action Theory (CCAT) as a framework for impacting local community-driven policy change to inform such processes for the region more broadly. Researchers from the GE National Center for Disease Control (NCDC) and AM National Institute of Health (NIH) will collaborate with Emory to execute the proposed research, train tobacco control researchers within their organizations and partnering universities, and train practitioners within local communities to build local coalitions for tobacco control policy. Twenty-eight communities (14 per country) will participate in the population-level tobacco survey at baseline and follow-up. Within each country, 7 communities will be randomized to the intervention condition and 7 to the control condition (14 communities per condition). In the intervention communities, public health center staff will form a coalition by recruiting partner organizations from civil society and other government sectors (e.g., health care, education), conduct situational assessment, and develop and implement action plans to promote the adoption and enforcement of smoke-free policies primarily in indoor and outdoor public places (e.g., worksites, hospitality). The GE NCDC and AM NIH will establish subcontracts with the local public health centers in the randomly selected communities to provide funding for local staff to develop local coalitions and to support program activities. The 14 communities assigned as controls will participate in the population-level survey and be provided with a site-specific summary of findings but will not participate in any aspects of the intervention. Additionally, to examine potential contamination in the control communities, a follow-up interview will be conducted with public health center leaders to assess any local coalition or grassroots actions regarding tobacco control that may have naturally occurred or be influenced by coalition activity in other communities.
Detailed description
Public health efforts in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be catalyzed by bolstering ways to optimally leverage local talents and resources, such as civil society. Developing effective models for aligning civil society and governmental public health at the local level in LMICs has the potential to impact a range of chronic diseases and risk factors, including tobacco use. Local coalitions have been a dominant strategy in tobacco control in the US, with well-documented success in establishing smoke-free policies specifically. However, this approach has not been widely leveraged or well-studied in LMICs or those with less democratic traditions than the US. Instead, in many LMICs, smoke-free policy progress is largely initiated at the national level. Parallel civil society movements at the local level may be needed to build support for and compliance with policies. Given their sociopolitical histories and high tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) rates, Georgia (GE) and Armenia (AM) are two strategic settings for the proposed work. The smoking prevalence is 57.7% and 52.3% in men (6th and 11th highest in the world) and 5.7% and 1.5% in women, respectively. Moreover, previous findings indicate extremely high rates of SHSe. However, there is also documented high receptivity to public smoke-free policies despite high use rates. In this matched-pairs community randomized controlled trial (CRCT), the impact of coalitions promoting smoke-free air policies on individual secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) will be examined. The Emory team will lead the oversight of the research design and execution of all components of the research. This proposal will build the capacity of Georgia (GE) and Armenia (AM) researchers to conduct high-quality mixed methods tobacco research and test the Community Coalition Action Theory (CCAT) as a framework for impacting local community-driven policy change to inform such processes for the region more broadly. Researchers from the GE National Center for Disease Control (NCDC) and AM National Institute of Health (NIH) will collaborate with Emory to execute the proposed research, train tobacco control researchers within their organizations and partnering universities (Tbilisi State Medical University, American University of Armenia), and train practitioners within local communities to build local coalitions for tobacco control policy. This study aims to: 1. conduct a matched-pair community randomized controlled trial in 28 municipalities in GE and AM to examine the impact of local coalitions promoting the adoption of smoke-free policies in public places, with the primary outcome of changes in SHSe over time; 2. assess how community context and coalition factors influence adoption of organizational and municipal smoke-free policies to provide an evidence-base for public health practice; 3. disseminate research findings regarding both the effectiveness and the process of establishing and maintaining coalitions, and consequently increasing smoke-free policies and reducing SHSe, to key stakeholders in GE and AM; and 4. capitalize on the proposed research and dissemination opportunities to build tobacco control research capacity within the GE NCDC, AM NIH, and partnering universities, as well as practice capacity within local public health centers and their civil society partners. Twenty-eight communities (14 per country) will participate in the population-level tobacco survey at baseline and follow-up. Within each country, 7 communities will be randomized to the intervention condition and 7 to the control condition (14 communities per condition). In the intervention communities, public health center staff will form a coalition by recruiting partner organizations from civil society and other government sectors (e.g., health care, education), conduct situational assessment, and develop and implement action plans to promote the adoption and enforcement of smoke-free policies in primarily in indoor and outdoor public places (e.g., worksites, hospitality). The GE NCDC and AM NIH will establish subcontracts with the local public health centers in the randomly selected communities to provide funding for local staff to develop local coalitions and to support program activities. The 14 communities assigned as controls will participate in the population-level survey and be provided with a site-specific summary of findings but will not participate in any aspects of the intervention. Additionally, to examine potential contamination in the control communities, a follow-up interview will be conducted with public health center leaders to assess any local coalition or grassroots actions regarding tobacco control that may have naturally occurred or be influenced by coalition activity in other communities. The GE NCDC and AM NIH will conduct cross-sectional population-level surveys in Year 1 (baseline) and in Years 4/5 (follow-up) in the intervention and control communities. A multi-stage, clustered sample design will be used to select 50 participants within each municipality. The most recent census data for each country and the respective municipalities will be used to establish the sampling frame.
Interventions
The intervention approach will be informed by the Community Coalition Action Theory (CCAT) developed by Butterfoss and Kegler. CCAT posits that coalitions form due to a threat, opportunity, or mandate. Public health center staff will form a coalition by recruiting partner organizations from civil society and other government sectors (e.g., health care, education), conduct situational assessment, and develop and implement action plans to promote the adoption and enforcement of smoke-free policies in public indoor and and outdoor spaces.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This is a matched-pairs community randomized controlled trial. 14 communities will receive the behavioral intervention and 14 will serve as control communities. Enrollment is on the community level rather than individual level.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Community Level Inclusion Criteria: * Population size ranging from approximately 6,000 to 90,000
Exclusion criteria
* Lack of interest of local health care center director
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | The frequency of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the past 30 days was assessed by asking the respondent to report the number of days they were exposed to SHS. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | To assess attitudes regarding smoke-free environments, respondents were asked whether they think smoking should or should not be allowed in places such as workplaces, indoor areas on school grounds, outdoor events, restaurants, and bars. Participants indicated how much the supported or opposed complete cigarette smoking bans on a 4-point scale where 1 = strongly oppose and 4 = strongly support. |
| Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | Smoke-free home policies at baseline and follow-up were assessed by asking about rules about smoking inside of the participant's home. Possible responses included: smoking is allowed, smoking is not allowed but there are exceptions, smoking is never allowed, or there are no rules about smoking in the home. |
| Attitude Regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | Attitudes regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure (SHSe) were examined by assessing the degree to which the respondent believes that smoke causes illnesses. Participants were asked Based on what you know or believe, does breathing other people's smoke cause serious illness in non-smokers? Possible responses are 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = somewhat, or 4 = a lot. |
| Enforcement of Smoke-Free Policies | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | Changes in enforcement of smoke-free policies in various settings will be measured by asking, In the past 7 days, how many times have you seen someone using tobacco in a location where it is prohibited? |
| Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | The frequency of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the past 30 days will be assessed by asking the respondent to report the number of days they were exposed to SHS in the home, in vehicles, at work, in indoor public places, and in outdoor public places. The frequency of exposures is evaluated as the number of days in the past 30 days the participant was exposed to SHS in the home, in vehicles, at work, in indoor public places, and in outdoor public places |
| Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline) | Among participants employed in a workplace with an indoor setting, workplace policies at baseline and follow-up were measured by asking, Which of the following best describes the indoor smoking policy where you work? Smoking is allowed anywhere, smoking is allowed only in some indoor areas, smoking is not allowed in any indoor areas, or there is no policy. |
Countries
Armenia, Georgia
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were from communities in Tbilisi, Georgia and Yerevan, Armenia. Community member participation began October 1, 2018 and the follow-up assessments occurred in Spring and Summer of 2022 (approximately 44 months after the start of community member participation in the baseline surveys). Follow-up assessments were completed by June 30, 2022.
Pre-assignment details
Fourteen communities delivered the study intervention and 14 continued as usual to serve as a control group. In this repeated cross-sectional study design, surveys were administered at baseline and follow-up (approximately 44 months after baseline) to community members. Individual community members were only assessed once, participating in either the baseline or follow-up time points.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Condition Community members in communities assigned to an intervention promoting the adoption and enforcement of smoke-free policies primarily in indoor and outdoor public places (e.g., worksites, hospitality) to reduce secondhand smoke exposure. | 732 |
| Control Condition Community members in communities assigned to the control condition which participated in population-level surveys but did not participate in any aspects of the intervention. | 724 |
| Total | 1,456 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention Condition | Total | Control Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 42.52 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.71 | 43.35 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.49 | 44.19 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.22 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 732 Participants | 1456 Participants | 724 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 732 Participants | 1456 Participants | 724 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Armenia | 351 Participants | 705 Participants | 354 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Georgia | 381 Participants | 751 Participants | 370 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 429 Participants | 881 Participants | 452 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 303 Participants | 575 Participants | 272 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 1,481 | 0 / 1,443 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 1,481 | 0 / 1,443 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 1,481 | 0 / 1,443 |
Outcome results
Secondhand Smoke Exposure
The frequency of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the past 30 days was assessed by asking the respondent to report the number of days they were exposed to SHS.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This analysis includes community members who completed the Baseline or Follow-up assessments. Community members at each time point are distinct groups who participated in the study only once rather than at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Baseline | 11.70 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 12.14 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Follow-up | 10.86 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 11.77 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Baseline | 12.08 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 12.35 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Follow-up | 10.51 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 11.92 |
Attitude Regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure
Attitudes regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure (SHSe) were examined by assessing the degree to which the respondent believes that smoke causes illnesses. Participants were asked Based on what you know or believe, does breathing other people's smoke cause serious illness in non-smokers? Possible responses are 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = somewhat, or 4 = a lot.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This analysis includes community members who completed the Baseline or Follow-up assessments. Community members at each time point are distinct groups who participated in the study only once rather than at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Baseline | 2.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Follow-up | 3.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Baseline | 2.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Secondhand Smoke Exposure | Follow-up | 3.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments
To assess attitudes regarding smoke-free environments, respondents were asked whether they think smoking should or should not be allowed in places such as workplaces, indoor areas on school grounds, outdoor events, restaurants, and bars. Participants indicated how much the supported or opposed complete cigarette smoking bans on a 4-point scale where 1 = strongly oppose and 4 = strongly support.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This analysis includes community members who completed the Baseline or Follow-up assessments. Community members at each time point are distinct groups who participated in the study only once rather than at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - In restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 3.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - In restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 3.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - On the outdoor terrace of restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 2.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - In bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 3.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - On the outdoor terrace of bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 2.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Indoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (hallways, lobbies, stairwells) | 3.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Outdoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (playgrounds, park benches) | 3.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Within individual apartment or condo units within a complex | 3.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Private vehicles when children under age 18 are present | 3.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Parks and beaches | 2.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Other public outdoor areas, such as open stadiums | 2.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - On the outdoor terrace of restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 2.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - In bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 3.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - On the outdoor terrace of bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 2.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.16 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up -Indoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (hallways, lobbies, stairwells) | 3.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Outdoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (playgrounds, park benches) | 2.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Within individual apartment or condo units within a complex | 3.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Private vehicles when children under age 18 are present | 3.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Parks and beaches | 2.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Intervention Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Other public outdoor areas, such as open stadiums | 2.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Private vehicles when children under age 18 are present | 3.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - In restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 3.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Other public outdoor areas, such as open stadiums | 2.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - In restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 3.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.02 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Outdoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (playgrounds, park benches) | 2.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - On the outdoor terrace of restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 2.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - On the outdoor terrace of restaurants, cafes, and cafeterias | 2.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - In bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 3.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Other public outdoor areas, such as open stadiums | 2.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - On the outdoor terrace of bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 2.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.24 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - In bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 3.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Indoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (hallways, lobbies, stairwells) | 3.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Within individual apartment or condo units within a complex | 2.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Outdoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (playgrounds, park benches) | 3.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - On the outdoor terrace of bars, pubs, or nightclubs | 2.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Within individual apartment or condo units within a complex | 3.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up - Parks and beaches | 2.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Private vehicles when children under age 18 are present | 3.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Follow-up -Indoor common areas of apartment or condominium complexes (hallways, lobbies, stairwells) | 3.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Control Condition | Attitude Regarding Smoke-Free Environments | Baseline - Parks and beaches | 2.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies
Smoke-free home policies at baseline and follow-up were assessed by asking about rules about smoking inside of the participant's home. Possible responses included: smoking is allowed, smoking is not allowed but there are exceptions, smoking is never allowed, or there are no rules about smoking in the home.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This analysis includes community members who completed the Baseline or Follow-up assessments. Community members at each time point are distinct groups who participated in the study only once rather than at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | No response | 3 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | Smoking is allowed | 91 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is allowed | 95 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | Smoking is never allowed | 298 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is not allowed but there are exceptions | 147 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | No response | 1 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is never allowed | 418 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | There are no rules about smoking in the home | 131 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | There are no rules about smoking in the home | 88 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | Smoking is not allowed but there are exceptions | 209 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | No response | 0 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | Smoking is allowed | 110 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | Smoking is not allowed but there are exceptions | 177 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | Smoking is never allowed | 263 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | There are no rules about smoking in the home | 172 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Baseline | No response | 2 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is allowed | 90 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is not allowed but there are exceptions | 136 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is never allowed | 369 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants Agreeing With Certain Home Policies | Follow-up | There are no rules about smoking in the home | 124 Participants |
Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies
Among participants employed in a workplace with an indoor setting, workplace policies at baseline and follow-up were measured by asking, Which of the following best describes the indoor smoking policy where you work? Smoking is allowed anywhere, smoking is allowed only in some indoor areas, smoking is not allowed in any indoor areas, or there is no policy.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This analysis includes community members who work outside of the home in a workplace with an indoor setting and who completed the Baseline or Follow-up assessments. Community members at each time point are distinct groups who participated in the study only once rather than at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | Smoking is allowed anywhere | 32 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | Smoking is allowed only in some indoor areas | 51 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | Smoking is not allowed in any indoor areas | 217 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | There is no policy | 40 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is allowed anywhere | 9 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is allowed only in some indoor areas | 46 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is not allowed in any indoor areas | 266 Participants |
| Intervention Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | There is no policy | 21 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | There is no policy | 11 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | Smoking is allowed anywhere | 38 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is allowed anywhere | 7 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | Smoking is allowed only in some indoor areas | 28 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is not allowed in any indoor areas | 233 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | Smoking is not allowed in any indoor areas | 173 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Follow-up | Smoking is allowed only in some indoor areas | 42 Participants |
| Control Condition | Count of Participants With Certain Workplace Policies | Baseline | There is no policy | 68 Participants |
Enforcement of Smoke-Free Policies
Changes in enforcement of smoke-free policies in various settings will be measured by asking, In the past 7 days, how many times have you seen someone using tobacco in a location where it is prohibited?
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This item was not administered at either study time point.
Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations
The frequency of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the past 30 days will be assessed by asking the respondent to report the number of days they were exposed to SHS in the home, in vehicles, at work, in indoor public places, and in outdoor public places. The frequency of exposures is evaluated as the number of days in the past 30 days the participant was exposed to SHS in the home, in vehicles, at work, in indoor public places, and in outdoor public places
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (approximately 44 months post-baseline)
Population: This analysis includes community members who completed the Baseline or Follow-up assessments. Community members at each time point are distinct groups who participated in the study only once rather than at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in the home | 6.83 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 11.48 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in vehicles | 3.87 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.15 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in indoor work areas | 4.16 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.66 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in indoor public areas | 1.74 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 4.71 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in outdoor public areas | 5.34 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.86 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in the home | 4.88 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 9.83 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in vehicles | 4.43 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.27 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in indoor work areas | 2.91 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in indoor public areas | 1.66 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 5.21 |
| Intervention Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in outdoor public areas | 6.78 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 9.68 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in indoor work areas | 3.06 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 7.68 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in the home | 7.18 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 11.53 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in the home | 4.72 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 9.83 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in vehicles | 3.93 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.36 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in outdoor public areas | 6.49 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 9.02 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in indoor work areas | 4.44 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.85 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in vehicles | 4.74 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 9.27 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in indoor public areas | 2.00 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 5.17 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Follow-up - Exposure in indoor public areas | 1.15 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 3.89 |
| Control Condition | Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Various Locations | Baseline - Exposure in outdoor public areas | 4.83 days with SHS exposure | Standard Deviation 8.79 |