Skip to content

Switch Study to Evaluate Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine in Virologically Suppressed Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Positive Adults (TANGO)

A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Non-inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Switching to Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine in HIV-1 Infected Adults Who Are Virologically Suppressed

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03446573
Enrollment
743
Registered
2018-02-27
Start date
2018-01-18
Completion date
2022-05-03
Last updated
2023-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Switch study, Non-inferiority, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, Tenofovir alafenamide, Dolutegravir, Lamivudine

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to establish if human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected adult participants with current virologic suppression on a \>=3-drug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) based regimen (TBR) remain suppressed upon switching to a two-drug regimen of dolutegravir (DTG) 50 milligram (mg) + lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg. This study will also provide important information regarding the safety and participant satisfaction with this two-drug regimen. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to DTG + 3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over 48 weeks in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced, virologically suppressed participants. This study also will characterize the long-term antiviral activity, tolerability and safety of DTG + 3TC compared to TBR through Week 144 and characterize the long-term antiviral activity, tolerability and safety of DTG + 3TC through Week 200. This will be a 200-week, Phase III, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter, parallel- group study. The study will include a screening phase (up to 28 days), a randomized early switch phase (Day 1 up to Week 148), a randomized late switch phase (Week 148 up to Week 200), and a continuation phase (post Week 200). HIV-1 infected adults on stable TBR will be randomized 1:1 to switch to DTG + 3TC once daily for up to 200 weeks, or to continue their TBR for 148 weeks, at which time and if HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) \<50 copies per milliliter (c/mL) at Week 144, these participants will switch to DTG + 3TC up to Week 200.

Interventions

DRUGDTG + 3TC

DTG+3TC is supplied as white, oval, film-coated, fixed dose combination tablet. The tablets will be available in packed high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with induction seals and child-resistant closures.

DRUGTAF based regimen (TBR)

Participants will continue to receive their TBR.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
ViiV Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This will be an open-label study and therefore no blinding is required. No summaries of the study data according to actual randomized treatment groups will be available to sponsor staff prior to the planned Week 24 preliminary analysis.

Intervention model description

This is a randomized study with parallel group assignment where participants will be randomized into one of the two treatment groups. Participants randomized to DTG + 3TC will receive DTG + 3TC up to Week 200. Participants randomized to TBR will continue to take their current regimen up to Week 148, at which time and if HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Week 144, these participants will switch to DTG + 3TC up to Week 200. Randomization will be stratified by Baseline third agent class (protease inhibitor \[PI\], integrase inhibitor \[INI\], or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor \[NNRTI\]).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and restrictions; * Participant must be likely to complete the study as planned; * Participant must be considered an appropriate candidate for participation in an investigative clinical trial with medication (example no active substance abuse, acute major organ disease, or planned long-term work assignments out of the country). * Aged 18 years or older (or older where required by local regulatory agencies), at the time of signing the informed consent. * HIV-1 infected men or women. * Documented evidence of at least two plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \<50 c/mL in the 12 months prior to Screening: one within the 6 to 12 month window, and one within 6 months prior to Screening. * Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Screening. * Must be on uninterrupted ART for at least 6 months prior to screening. Only the following regimens are allowed: * Participant on a TAF-based regimen for at least 6 months as the initial regimen, or * Participants who switched from a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) first-regimen TAF, without any changes to the other drugs in their regimen, and have been on the TAF-based regimen for at least 3 months immediately prior to Screening i.e., the only switch made is from TDF to TAF. This switch must have occurred due to tolerability/safety, access to medications, or convenience/simplification, and must NOT have been done for suspected or established treatment failure. A switch from a PI boosted with ritonavir to the same PI boosted with cobicistat is allowed (and vice versa). * A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative serum human chorionic gonadotrophin \[hCG\] test at screen and a negative urine hCG test at randomization \[a local serum hCG test at Randomization is allowed if it can be done, and results obtained, within 24 hours prior to randomization\]), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: a. Non-reproductive potential defined as: * Pre-menopausal females with one of the following: * Documented tubal ligation * Documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion * Hysterectomy * Documented bilateral oophorectomy * Post-menopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea (in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone \[FSH\] and estradiol levels consistent with menopause \[refer to laboratory reference ranges for confirmatory levels\]). Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment. b. Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the Modified List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy in Females of Reproductive Potential (FRP) from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and for at least 2 weeks after the last dose of study medication. * The investigator is responsible for ensuring that participants understand how to properly use these methods of contraception. All participants participating in the study should be counseled on safer sexual practices including the use and benefit/risk of effective barrier methods (e.g., male condom) and on the risk of HIV transmission to an uninfected partner. * Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and the protocol. Eligible participants or their legal guardians must sign a written informed consent form before any protocol-specified assessments are conducted. Participants enrolled in France must be affiliated to, or a beneficiary of, a social security category.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study. * Any evidence of an active Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Stage 3 disease, EXCEPT cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy. Historical or current CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/millimeter (mm)\^3 are NOT exclusionary. * Participants with severe hepatic impairment (Class C) as determined by Child-Pugh classification. * Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). * Evidence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on the results of testing at Screening for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), Hepatitis B surface antigen antibody (anti-HBs) and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as follows: participants positive for HBsAg are excluded; participants negative for anti-HBs but positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for HBV DNA are excluded. * Anticipated need for any hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the first 48 weeks of the study, or anticipated need for HCV therapy based on interferon or for any drugs that have a potential for adverse drug-drug interactions with study treatment throughout the entire study period. * Untreated syphilis infection (positive rapid plasma reagin \[RPR\] at Screening without clear documentation of treatment). Participants who are at least 7 days post completed treatment are eligible. * History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class. * Ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical, anal or penile intraepithelial neoplasia. * Participants who in the investigator's judgment, poses a significant suicidality risk. * Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening. * Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening: radiation therapy; cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; any systemic immune suppressant. * Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half-lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of investigational product (IP). * Use of any regimen consisting of single or dual ART. * Any evidence of major nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutation or presence of any major INSTI resistance-associated mutation in any available prior resistance genotype assay test result, if known, must be provided to ViiV after screening and before randomization for review by ViiV Virology. * Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>=5 times (\*) the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT \>=3 \* ULN and bilirubin \>=1.5 \* ULN (with \>35 percent \[%\] direct bilirubin). * Creatinine clearance of \<50 milliliter (mL)/minute/1.73 meter\^2 via Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method. * Within the 6 to 12 month window prior to Screening and after confirmed suppression to \<50 c/mL, any plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement \>200 c/mL. * Within the 6 to 12 month window prior to Screening and after confirmed suppression to \<50 c/mL, 2 or more plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \>=50 c/mL. * Within 6 months prior to Screening and after confirmed suppression to \<50 c/mL on current ART regimen, any plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement \>=50 c/mL. * Any drug holiday during the 6 months prior to Screening, except for brief periods (less than 1 month) where all ART was stopped due to tolerability and/or safety concerns. * Any history of switch to another regimen, defined as change of a single drug or multiple drugs simultaneously, due to virologic failure to therapy (defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥400 c/mL. * Participants enrolled in France (or in other countries as required by local regulations or Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board \[IRB\]) who: * Participated in any study using an investigational drug or vaccine during the previous 60 days or 5 half-lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the experimental drug or vaccine, whichever is longer, prior to screening for the study, or * Participate simultaneously in another clinical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Category at Week 48Week 48Percentage of participants with virologic failure (plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL) was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to the visit of interest. Intent-to-treat exposed (ITT-E) Population comprises of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment either DTG + 3TC or TBR. Participants were assessed according to the treatment to which the participant was randomized. Any participant receiving a treatment randomization number was considered to be randomized.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 24. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Weeks 96, 144Weeks 96 and 144Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 24. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Percentage values are rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144Weeks 96 and 144Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144.
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144CD4+ cells are a type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+and evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable
Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+/CD8+ cell count ratio. It was assessed by flow cyclometry to evaluate the immunologic activity of switching to DTG+3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over 48 Weeks. Baseline (Day 1) values were the actual CD4+ cell count ratio values at pre-dose Day 1. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable .
Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+/CD8+ cell count ratio and were evaluated by flow cyclometry to evaluate the immunologic activity of switching to DTG+3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over Weeks 96 and 144. Baseline (Day 1) values are the actual CD4+ cell count ratio values at pre-dose Day 1. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable
Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48At Weeks 24 and 48HIV-associated conditions were recorded during the study and were assessed according to the 2014 CDC Classification System for HIV Infection in Adults. CDC classification for HIV were: Stage 1: No AIDS defining condition and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count: \>=500 cells/mcL; Stage 2: No AIDS infection and CD4+ lymphocyte count: 200-499 cell/mcL and Stage 3:Documented AIDS defining condition or CD4+ T-lymphocye count \<200 cells/mcL. Disease progression summarize participants who had HIV infection stage 3 associated conditions or death. Indicators of clinical disease progression were defined as: CDC Category Stage 1 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 2 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 3 at enrollment to New Stage 3 Event; CDC Category Stage 1, 2 or 3 at enrollment to Death.
Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144At Weeks 96 and 144HIV-associated conditions were recorded during the study and assessed according to the 2014 CDC Classification System for HIV Infection in Adults. CDC classification for HIV is: Stage 1: No AIDS defining condition and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count: \>=500 cells/mcL; Stage 2: No AIDS infection and CD4+ lymphocyte count: 200-499 cell/mcL and Stage 3: Documented AIDS-defining condition or CD4+ T-lymphocye count \<200 cells/mcL. Indicators of clinical disease progression is defined as: CDC Category Stage 1 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 2 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 3 at enrollment to New Stage 3 Event; CDC Category Stage 1, 2 or 3 at enrollment to Death.
Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Common (>=2%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs): Up to Week 48Up to Week 48An AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to study treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other important medical event as per medical or scientific judgment . Safety Population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment either DTG + 3TC or TBR. This population was based on the treatment the participant actually received. Number of participants with any SAE and common (\>=2%) non-SAEs are presented.
Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48An AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to study treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other important medical event as per medical or scientific judgment . Number of TDF-based regimen participants with any SAE and common (\>=2%) non-SAEs are presented.
Number of Participants With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 148Up to Week 148An AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to study treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other important medical event as per medical or scientific judgment
Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.
Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of TDF-based regimen participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.
Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Up to Week 144An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Number of participants who discontinued the treatment due to adverse events have been presented.
Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Number of participants who discontinued the treatment due to adverse events have been presented.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 144Up to Week 144An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48Blood samples were collected up to Week 48 for the analysis of hematology parameters-platelet count, neutrophils, hemoglobin and leukocytes. Any abnormality in hematology parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale from Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities in any of the hematology parameters have been presented.
Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Up to Week 36Blood samples were collected up to the Week 36 visit for the analysis of hematology parameters-platelet count, neutrophils, hemoglobin and leukocytes. Any abnormality in hematology parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale from Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those TDF-based regimen participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities in any of the hematology parameters have been presented.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Up to Week 144Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for the analysis of hematology parameters-platelet count, neutrophils, hemoglobin and leukocytes. Any abnormality in hematology parameters are were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale from Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48Blood samples were collected up to Week 48 for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted for body surface area (BSA), GFR from cystatin C adjusted using chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, phosphate and triglycerides. Any abnormality in clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale From Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.
Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Up to Week 36samples were collected up to the Week 36 visit for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted using chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, phosphate and triglycerides. Any abnormality in clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale From Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Up to Week 144Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: ALT, albumin, ALP, AST, bilirubin, CO2, cholesterol, CK, creatinine, direct bilirubin, GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, LDL cholesterol, phosphate triglycerides and lactate dehydrogenase. Any abnormality in clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale From Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48. Baseline is defined as Day 1. Change from Baseline in UA/C was calculated as UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UA/C ratio calculated at Baseline. Estimated geometric mean adjusted ratio (each visit over Baseline) and 95% CI have been presented. Change from Baseline in UP/C and UA/C was calculated as UP/C and UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UP/C and UA/C ratio calculated at Baseline, respectively. Estimated geometric mean adjusted ratio (each visit over Baseline) and 95% CI have been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal biomarkers - urine albumin/creatinine ratio and urine protein/creatinine ratio. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value. (Day 1). Change from Baseline in UA/C was calculated as UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UA/C ratio calculated at Baseline. Change from Baseline in UP/C was calculated as UP/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UP/C ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Urine samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144. Baseline is defined as Day 1. Change from Baseline in UA/C is defined as UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UA/C ratio at Baseline. Change from Baseline in UP/C and UA/C is defined as UP/C and UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UP/C and UA/C ratio at Baseline, respectively. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 to assess urine beta-2 microglobulin/urine creatinine. Geometric mean ratio (visit divided by Baseline) and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio has been presented. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine was calculated as urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine biomarker samples were collected to assess urine beta-2 microglobulin/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine was calculated as urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144 to assess urine beta-2 microglobulin/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine is defined as urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline and at Weeks 24 and 48 to assess urine phosphate. Geometric mean ratio (visit divided by Baseline) and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio has been presented. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine phosphate was calculated as urine phosphate at post-Baseline visit minus urine phosphate calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine biomarker samples were collected to assess urine phosphate. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine phosphate was calculated as urine phosphate at post-Baseline visit minus urine phosphate calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144 to assess urine phosphate. Baseline (Day 1) value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine phosphate is defined as urine phosphate at post-Baseline visit minus urine phosphate at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 to assess urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine. Geometric mean ratio (visit divided by Baseline) and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio has been presented. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio was calculated as Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Urine biomarker samples were collected to assess urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine was calculated as urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144 to assess urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio is defined as Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 48 to assess fasting lipids which included plasma cholesterol, plasma LDL cholesterol, plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. Baseline value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1), weeks 24 and 48 visit (participant withdrew from the study at Week 36) to assess fasting lipids which included plasma cholesterol, plasma LDL cholesterol, plasma HDL cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. Baseline value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline values for fasting lipids in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 96 and 144 to assess fasting lipids which includes plasma cholesterol, plasma LDL cholesterol, plasma HDL cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. Baseline value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48Plasma samples were collected for drug resistance testing. Number of participants, who met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with genotypic resistance to INSTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), NNRTI and PI was summarized.
Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144Up to Week 144Plasma samples were collected for drug resistance testing. Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with genotypic resistance to INSTI, NRTI, NNRTI and PI are summarized.
Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48Up to Week 48Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with phenotypic resistance to INSTI, NNRTI,NRTI and PI were summarized. Assessment of antiviral activity of ART using phenotypic test results was interpreted through a proprietary algorithm (from Monogram Biosciences), which provided the overall susceptibility of the drug. Partially sensitive and resistant calls were considered resistant in this analysis. The phenotypic resistance was calculated using binary scoring system, where 0 was considered as sensitive and 1 as resistance. Phenotypic Resistance data for the following INSTI, NNRTI, NRTI and PI drugs in participants Meeting CVW Criteria has been presented.
Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144Up to Week 144Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with phenotypic resistance to INSTI,NNRT,NRTI and PI were summarized. Assessment of antiviral activity of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) using phenotypic test results was interpreted through a proprietary algorithm (from Monogram Biosciences), which provided the overall susceptibility of the drug. Partially sensitive and resistant calls were considered resistant in this analysis. The phenotypic resistance was calculated using binary scoring system, where 0 was considered as sensitive and 1 as resistance. Phenotypic Resistance data for the following INSTI, NNRTI, NRTI and PI drugs in participants Meeting CVW Criteria has been presented.
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected for analysis of bone biomarkers. Baseline was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, body mass index (BMI) (continuous), smoking status, vitamin D use, Baseline biomarker (continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor.One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum CTX-1 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected for analysis of bone biomarkers. Baseline was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1) . Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in bone biomarkers-serum bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), osteocalcin, serum P1NP and serum CTX-1 in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Serum samples were collected for analysis of bone biomarkers. Baseline is latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected for analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1) with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, BMI (continuous), smoking status, vitamin D use, Baseline biomarker (continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor.One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected for the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Baseline value was the value from latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline values for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Serum samples were collected for analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Baseline value is latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected to assess renal biomarker. Baseline was latest pre-dose assessment value with non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for following:treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count(continuous), age(continuous), sex, race, BMI(continuous), presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker(continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal inflammation biomarker - cystatin C. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline values for serum cystatin -C biomarker in TDF based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Serum samples were collected to assess renal biomarker. Baseline is latest pre-dose assessment value with non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples assessed:serum GFR from cystatin C and from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI Baseline(Day 1) was value from latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value. Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class,CD4+ cell count(continuous),age(continuous), sex, race, BMI(continuous),presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker(continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal inflammation biomarkers - serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and serum GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and serum GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48Week 48Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL (virologic success) was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48 to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to DTG +3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over 48 weeks. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples assessed: renal inflammation biomarker serum creatinine.Baseline(Day 1)was value from latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value. Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count(continuous), age(continuous), sex, race, BMI(continuous), presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker(continuous), treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenBaseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48Serum samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal inflammation biomarker - serum creatinine. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in serum creatinine in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Serum samples were collected to assess renal inflammation biomarker - serum creatinine. Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Week 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides profile of participant function and global health state rating. Five-item measure has 1question assessing each of 5dimensions:mobility,self-care,usual activities,pain/discomfort,anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems,2=slight problems,3=moderate problems,4=severe problems,5=extreme problems. Health state is defined by combining levels of answers from each of 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code.Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state.EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health.Baseline is latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1).Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1) and change from Baseline is defined as post-dose value minus Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144Serum samples were collected to assess serum GFR from cystatin C and from creatinine adjusted for BSA. Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This non-inferiority study evaluated antiviral activity of switching to dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) fixed dose combination (FDC) once daily compared to continuation of a Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimen (TBR) over 148 weeks in virologically suppressed participants with human immunodeficiency type 1 infection. At week 148 all participants received DTG + 3TC FDC until week 196.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 743 participants were randomized to receive treatment. Two participants in the DTG+3TC group were randomized but not treated. A total of 741 participants received at least one dose of study treatment either DTG + 3TC or TBR creating the intent to treat-exposed (ITT-E) Population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DTG+3TC FDC
Participants who were on a stable TBR and who had an HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<)50 copies per millilter (c/mL) at the time of screening, received fixed dose combination of DTG 50 milligrams (mg) + 3TC 300 mg in early switch phase (Day 1 to Week 148) and continued to receive DTG/3TC FDC in late switch phase (Week 148 to Week 196).
369
TAF-based Regimen
Participants who were on a stable TBR and had an HIV-1 RNA\<50 c/mL at the time of screening received TBR up to Week 148 in early switch phase, these participants were switched to DTG/3TC FDC in late switch phase (Week 148 to Week 196). One participant randomized to this arm received TDF rather than TAF-and was presented within the TAF-based regimen arm (early switch phase) for efficacy because the efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable. However, the participant was presented separately under TDF-based regimenarm (early switch phase) for Safety because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ.
372
Total741

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Adverse Event237
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Lack of Efficacy06
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Lost to Follow-up410
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Physician Decision211
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Protocol Violation56
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Randomized, but did not receive treatment20
Early Switch Phase (Day 1 to Week 148)Withdrawal by Subject1633
Late Switch Phase (Week 148 to Week 196)Adverse Event29
Late Switch Phase (Week 148 to Week 196)Lack of Efficacy11
Late Switch Phase (Week 148 to Week 196)Lost to Follow-up56
Late Switch Phase (Week 148 to Week 196)Physician Decision01
Late Switch Phase (Week 148 to Week 196)Protocol Violation01
Late Switch Phase (Week 148 to Week 196)Withdrawal by Subject46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTAF-based RegimenDTG+3TC FDCTotal
Age, Continuous40.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.54
40.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76
40.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15
Baseline third agents
INSTI
296 Participants289 Participants585 Participants
Baseline third agents
NNRTI
48 Participants51 Participants99 Participants
Baseline third agents
PI
28 Participants29 Participants57 Participants
Cluster of differentiation 4 plus (CD4+) cell count720.0 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)682.0 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)688.0 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
HIV infection by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification
HIV infection Stage 1
259 Participants255 Participants514 Participants
HIV infection by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification
HIV infection Stage 2
94 Participants94 Participants188 Participants
HIV infection by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification
HIV infection Stage 3
19 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian and White
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Central/South Asian Heritage (H)
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Japanese H/East Asian H/South East Asian H
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
58 Participants50 Participants108 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American and White
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White-Arabic/NA H and white/caucasia/European H
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White-Arabic/North African (NA) H
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White-White/caucasian/European H
286 Participants292 Participants578 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants25 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
339 Participants344 Participants683 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 3690 / 3710 / 10 / 298
other
Total, other adverse events
327 / 369304 / 3711 / 1187 / 298
serious
Total, serious adverse events
65 / 36944 / 3710 / 115 / 298

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Category at Week 48

Percentage of participants with virologic failure (plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL) was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to the visit of interest. Intent-to-treat exposed (ITT-E) Population comprises of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment either DTG + 3TC or TBR. Participants were assessed according to the treatment to which the participant was randomized. Any participant receiving a treatment randomization number was considered to be randomized.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Category at Week 480.3 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Category at Week 480.5 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-1.2, 0.7]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48

Serum samples were collected for analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1) with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, BMI (continuous), smoking status, vitamin D use, Baseline biomarker (continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor.One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 3550.0 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.1
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 343-5.8 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.21
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 3552.1 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.15
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 343-3.5 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.13
p-value: 0.17395% CI: [-5.3, 1]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.16895% CI: [-5.5, 1]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Serum samples were collected for the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Baseline value was the value from latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline values for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 24, n=12 Nanomoles per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 96 and 144

Serum samples were collected for analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Baseline value is latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=315, 291-11.5 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.17
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=315, 303-7.5 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.28
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=315, 291-2.2 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 2.06
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=315, 303-1.9 Nanomoles per literStandard Error 1.5
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-14, -4.7]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-9.4, -1.7]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144

Serum samples were collected for analysis of bone biomarkers. Baseline is latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Bone-ALP, Week 96, n=316, 289-0.62 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.145
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144P1NP, Week 96, n=316 ,2906.7 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.87
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Osteocalcin, Week 96, n=315 , 288-1.97 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.288
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144P1NP, Week 144, n=315, 3023.9 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.94
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Bone-ALP, Week 144, n=314, 301-0.27 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.163
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144CTX-1, Week 96 ,n=315, 2890.0201 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.01123
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144CTX-1, Week 48, n=315, 3000.0022 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.00947
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Osteocalcin, Week 144, n=315, 301-0.74 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.266
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144CTX-1, Week 48, n=315, 300-0.0104 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.00907
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Bone-ALP, Week 96, n=316, 289-0.79 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.137
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Bone-ALP, Week 144, n=314, 301-0.40 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.177
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Osteocalcin, Week 96, n=315 , 288-0.10 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.306
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144Osteocalcin, Week 144, n=315, 3011.21 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.32
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144P1NP, Week 96, n=316 ,2904.7 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.8
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144P1NP, Week 144, n=315, 3023.5 Micrograms per literStandard Error 1.04
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-ALP, Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum Type 1 CTX-1 at Weeks 96 and 144CTX-1, Week 96 ,n=315, 2890.0050 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.00929
p-value: 0.38695% CI: [-0.22, 0.57]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.57395% CI: [-0.34, 0.61]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.7, -1.04]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.77, -1.14]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.08295% CI: [-0.3, 4.4]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.76595% CI: [-2.3, 3.2]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.30195% CI: [-0.0136, 0.0438]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-0.0133, 0.0384]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum CTX-1 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen at Weeks 24 and 48

Serum samples were collected for analysis of bone biomarkers. Baseline was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1) . Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in bone biomarkers-serum bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), osteocalcin, serum P1NP and serum CTX-1 in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum CTX-1 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen at Weeks 24 and 48Bone-ALP, Week 24, n=10.3 Micrograms per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum CTX-1 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen at Weeks 24 and 48Osteocalcin, Week 24, n=113.4 Micrograms per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum CTX-1 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen at Weeks 24 and 48P1NP, Week24, n=111 Micrograms per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum P1NP and Serum CTX-1 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen at Weeks 24 and 48CTX-1, Week 24,n=10.045 Micrograms per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48

Serum samples were collected for analysis of bone biomarkers. Baseline was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, body mass index (BMI) (continuous), smoking status, vitamin D use, Baseline biomarker (continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor.One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48CTX-1, Week 48, n=343, 3430.0602 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.01024
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Bone-ALP, Week 24, n=350, 354-0.77 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.112
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Bone-ALP, Week 48, n=343, 342-0.03 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.145
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Osteocalcin, Week 24, n=350 ,353-1.08 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.248
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Osteocalcin, Week 48, n=343, 342-1.15 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.26
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48P1NP, Week24, n=349 ,3567.0 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.87
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48CTX-1, Week 24,n=350,3560.0350 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.01057
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48P1NP, Week48, n=342, 3439.3 Micrograms per literStandard Error 1.06
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48P1NP, Week48, n=342, 3436.4 Micrograms per literStandard Error 1
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48CTX-1, Week 48, n=343, 3430.0310 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.00889
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Osteocalcin, Week 48, n=343, 3420.69 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.279
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Bone-ALP, Week 24, n=350, 354-1.05 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.089
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48CTX-1, Week 24,n=350,356-0.0031 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.00833
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Bone-ALP, Week 48, n=343, 342-0.34 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.117
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48P1NP, Week24, n=349 ,3565.0 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.72
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-serum Bone-specific ALP (Bone-ALP), Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24 and 48Osteocalcin, Week 24, n=350 ,3530.26 Micrograms per literStandard Error 0.229
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [0, 0.57]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.09495% CI: [-0.05, 0.68]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.01, -0.68]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.59, -1.09]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.06695% CI: [-0.1, 4.3]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.04695% CI: [0, 5.8]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [0.0117, 0.0646]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.03295% CI: [0.0025, 0.0559]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48

Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+/CD8+ cell count ratio. It was assessed by flow cyclometry to evaluate the immunologic activity of switching to DTG+3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over 48 Weeks. Baseline (Day 1) values were the actual CD4+ cell count ratio values at pre-dose Day 1. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable .

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-E Population. All 741 (369+372) participants were analyzed, however only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=346, 3580.010 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=342, 3430.030 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=346, 3580.040 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=342, 3430.050 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144

Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+/CD8+ cell count ratio and were evaluated by flow cyclometry to evaluate the immunologic activity of switching to DTG+3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over Weeks 96 and 144. Baseline (Day 1) values are the actual CD4+ cell count ratio values at pre-dose Day 1. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=312, 2920.035 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=307, 3000.060 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=312, 2920.080 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+/CD8+ Cell Count Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=307, 3000.100 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48

CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-E Population. All 741 (369+372) participants were analyzed, however only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 35921.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 34522.5 Cells per cubic millimeter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 3596.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 34511.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 96 and 144

CD4+ cells are a type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+and evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=315, 29561.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=309, 30136.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=315, 29545.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=309, 30135.0 Cells per cubic millimeter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and 48

EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1) and change from Baseline is defined as post-dose value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and 48Week 241.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and 48Week 481.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and 48Week 241.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and 48Week 481.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
p-value: 0.87995% CI: [-1.4, 1.2]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.41495% CI: [-1.9, 0.8]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Weeks 96 and 144

EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=364, 3680.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=364, 3690.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=364, 3681.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=364, 3691.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
p-value: 0.10295% CI: [-2.5, 0.2]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.09395% CI: [-2.8, 0.2]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Weeks 96 and 144

EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides profile of participant function and global health state rating. Five-item measure has 1question assessing each of 5dimensions:mobility,self-care,usual activities,pain/discomfort,anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems,2=slight problems,3=moderate problems,4=severe problems,5=extreme problems. Health state is defined by combining levels of answers from each of 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code.Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state.EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health.Baseline is latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1).Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=364, 370-0.0036 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00442
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=364, 369-0.0151 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00502
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=364, 370-0.0038 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00446
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=364, 369-0.0042 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00492
p-value: 0.96595% CI: [-0.0121, 0.0126]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.1295% CI: [-0.0247, 0.0029]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Week 24 and 48

EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Week 24 and 48Week 480.0037 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00407
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Week 24 and 48Week 240.0029 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00383
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Week 24 and 48Week 240.0046 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00352
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Week 24 and 48Week 480.0023 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.00373
p-value: 0.74195% CI: [-0.0119, 0.0085]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.79295% CI: [-0.0094, 0.0123]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 48 to assess fasting lipids which included plasma cholesterol, plasma LDL cholesterol, plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. Baseline value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 48, n=275, 2630.000 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma cholesterol, Week 48, n=275, 263-0.200 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma Triglycerides, Week 24, n=282, 264-0.100 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma cholesterol, Week 24, n=282, 264-0.325 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 24, n=282, 264-0.210 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 48, n=275, 263-0.170 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma Triglycerides, Week 48, n=275, 263-0.100 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 24, n=282, 264-0.050 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma Triglycerides, Week 48, n=275, 2630.100 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 24, n=282, 264-0.060 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 48, n=275, 2630.070 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma cholesterol, Week 24, n=282, 2640.000 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma Triglycerides, Week 24, n=282, 2640.060 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 48, n=275, 2630.050 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 24, n=282, 2640.050 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48Plasma cholesterol, Week 48, n=275, 2630.100 Millimoles per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1), weeks 24 and 48 visit (participant withdrew from the study at Week 36) to assess fasting lipids which included plasma cholesterol, plasma LDL cholesterol, plasma HDL cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. Baseline value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline values for fasting lipids in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenPlasma cholesterol, Week 24, n=10 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenPlasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 24, n=1-0.67 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenPlasma Triglycerides, Week 24, n=11.36 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenPlasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 24, n=10.05 Millimoles per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 96 and 144 to assess fasting lipids which includes plasma cholesterol, plasma LDL cholesterol, plasma HDL cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. Baseline value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 96, n=238, 213-5.6 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 144, n=243, 230-5.0 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma Triglycerides, Week 144, n=243, 230-9.4 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 96, n=238, 213-3.8 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 144, n=243, 230-3.8 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma cholesterol, Week 96, n=238, 213-3.7 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma cholesterol, Week 144, n=243, 230-4.0 Millimoles per liter
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma Triglycerides, Week 96, n=238, 213-2.1 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma cholesterol, Week 144, n=243, 2303.8 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 96, n=238, 2131.7 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma LDL Cholesterol, Week 144, n=243, 2304.2 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma Triglycerides, Week 96, n=238, 2134.9 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma cholesterol, Week 96, n=238, 2131.2 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma Triglycerides, Week 144, n=243, 2302.2 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 144, n=243, 2303.8 Millimoles per liter
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Weeks 96 and 144Plasma HDL Cholesterol, Week 96, n=238, 2130.0 Millimoles per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48

Serum samples assessed: renal inflammation biomarker serum creatinine.Baseline(Day 1)was value from latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value. Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count(continuous), age(continuous), sex, race, BMI(continuous), presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker(continuous), treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 3597.47 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.466
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 3456.67 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.493
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 3452.18 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.45
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 3593.11 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.495
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.03, 5.7]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.18, 5.81]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Serum samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal inflammation biomarker - serum creatinine. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in serum creatinine in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 24, n=1-8 Micromoles per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144

Serum samples were collected to assess renal inflammation biomarker - serum creatinine. Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=316, 2945.53 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.553
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=311, 3029.25 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.637
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=316, 2940.58 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.515
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=311, 3025.17 Micromoles per literStandard Error 0.633
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.47, 6.43]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.32, 5.85]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48

Serum samples were collected to assess renal biomarker. Baseline was latest pre-dose assessment value with non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and its corresponding standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for following:treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count(continuous), age(continuous), sex, race, BMI(continuous), presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker(continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 357-0.03 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.005
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 3430.00 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.006
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=351, 357-0.02 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.004
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=344, 3430.01 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.005
p-value: 0.02795% CI: [-0.03, 0]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.06195% CI: [-0.03, 0]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Serum samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal inflammation biomarker - cystatin C. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline values for serum cystatin -C biomarker in TDF based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 24, n=10 Milligrams per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 96 and 144

Serum samples were collected to assess renal biomarker. Baseline is latest pre-dose assessment value with non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=316, 2900.07 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.008
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=315, 3020.13 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.006
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=316, 2900.10 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.009
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum Cystatin C at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=315, 3020.14 Milligrams per literStandard Error 0.006
p-value: 0.09495% CI: [-0.03, 0]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.06, -0.01]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48

Serum samples assessed:serum GFR from cystatin C and from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI Baseline(Day 1) was value from latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value. Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.Adjusted mean was estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, Baseline third agent class,CD4+ cell count(continuous),age(continuous), sex, race, BMI(continuous),presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker(continuous), treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline value by visit interaction, with visit as repeated factor. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from creatinine CKD-EPI, Week 24, n=351, 359-8.8 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.48
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 24, n=351, 3573.2 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.52
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from creatinine CKD-EPI, Week 48, n=344, 345-7.7 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.48
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 48, n=344, 3430.1 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.61
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from creatinine CKD-EPI, Week 48, n=344, 345-2.9 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.48
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 48, n=344, 343-1.6 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.59
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from creatinine CKD-EPI, Week 24, n=351, 359-3.8 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.47
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 24, n=351, 3571.5 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.46
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [0.4, 3.1]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.05995% CI: [-0.1, 3.3]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.3, -3.7]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.1, -3.4]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Serum samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal inflammation biomarkers - serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and serum GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and serum GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI in TDF-based regimen participants has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenGFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 24, n=10 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter square
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenGFR from creatinine CKD-EPI, Week 24, n=14 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter square
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144

Serum samples were collected to assess serum GFR from cystatin C and from creatinine adjusted for BSA. Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value (Day 1). Change from Baseline is post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 96, n=316, 290-7.6 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.89
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 144, n=315, 302-13.9 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.71
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Week 96, n=315, 294-7.2 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.55
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Week 144, n=311, 300-11.5 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.62
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Week 144, n=311, 300-7.0 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.6
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 96, n=316, 290-11.7 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.99
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Week 96, n=315, 294-1.9 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.52
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker- Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 96 and 144GFR from cystatin C CKD-EPI, Week 144, n=315, 302-15.8 Milliliters/minute/1.73*meter squareStandard Error 0.7
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.5, 6.7]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.06495% CI: [-0.1, 3.8]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.7, -3.8]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.2, -2.8]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Urine samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48 to assess renal biomarkers - urine albumin/creatinine ratio and urine protein/creatinine ratio. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment value with a non-missing value. (Day 1). Change from Baseline in UA/C was calculated as UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UA/C ratio calculated at Baseline. Change from Baseline in UP/C was calculated as UP/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UP/C ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Receiving TDF-based RegimenUA/C, Week 24, n=10 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Receiving TDF-based RegimenUP/C, Week 24, n=10.3 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144

Urine samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144. Baseline is defined as Day 1. Change from Baseline in UA/C is defined as UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UA/C ratio at Baseline. Change from Baseline in UP/C and UA/C is defined as UP/C and UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UP/C and UA/C ratio at Baseline, respectively. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UA/C, Week 96, n=208, 1751.058 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UA/C, Week 144, n=202, 1791.203 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UP/C, Week 96, n=245, 2061.048 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UP/C, Week 144, n=237, 2201.182 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UP/C, Week 144, n=237, 2201.188 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UA/C, Week 96, n=208, 1751.075 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UP/C, Week 96, n=245, 2061.105 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- UA/C Ratio and UP/C Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144UA/C, Week 144, n=202, 1791.200 Ratio
p-value: 0.795% CI: [0.866, 1.102]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.795% CI: [0.835, 1.129]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.35695% CI: [0.907, 1.036]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.81495% CI: [0.916, 1.071]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48

Urine samples were collected at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48. Baseline is defined as Day 1. Change from Baseline in UA/C was calculated as UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UA/C ratio calculated at Baseline. Estimated geometric mean adjusted ratio (each visit over Baseline) and 95% CI have been presented. Change from Baseline in UP/C and UA/C was calculated as UP/C and UA/C ratio at post-Baseline visit minus UP/C and UA/C ratio calculated at Baseline, respectively. Estimated geometric mean adjusted ratio (each visit over Baseline) and 95% CI have been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UA/C, Week 24, n=235, 2301.080 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UA/C, Week 48, n=230, 2241.125 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UP/C, Week 24, n=267, 2610.955 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UP/C, Week 48, n=261, 2570.971 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UP/C, Week 48, n=261, 2571.016 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UA/C, Week 24, n=235, 2301.022 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UP/C, Week 24, n=267, 2610.976 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine (UA/C) Ratio and Urine Protein/Creatinine (UP/C) Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48UA/C, Week 48, n=230, 2241.059 Ratio
p-value: 0.25795% CI: [0.96, 1.164]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.3595% CI: [0.936, 1.205]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.47395% CI: [0.924, 1.037]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.21295% CI: [0.891, 1.026]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48

Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 to assess urine beta-2 microglobulin/urine creatinine. Geometric mean ratio (visit divided by Baseline) and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio has been presented. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine was calculated as urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=136, 1410.991 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=126, 1410.973 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=136, 1411.034 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=126, 1410.922 Ratio
p-value: 0.5695% CI: [0.83, 1.106]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.48995% CI: [0.906, 1.229]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Urine biomarker samples were collected to assess urine beta-2 microglobulin/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine was calculated as urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Data was not collected for this arm. Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue
UnknownChange From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 24
UnknownChange From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 48
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144

Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144 to assess urine beta-2 microglobulin/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine is defined as urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine beta-2-microglobulin/urine creatinine ratio at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category title)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=109, 1071.080 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=101, 970.904 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=109, 1070.986 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin/Urine Creatinine Ratio at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=101, 970.958 Ratio
p-value: 0.08195% CI: [0.981, 1.384]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.83495% CI: [0.819, 1.175]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48

Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline and at Weeks 24 and 48 to assess urine phosphate. Geometric mean ratio (visit divided by Baseline) and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio has been presented. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine phosphate was calculated as urine phosphate at post-Baseline visit minus urine phosphate calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=348, 3520.955 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=342, 3400.969 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=348, 3520.940 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=342, 3400.970 Ratio
p-value: 0.75895% CI: [0.915, 1.13]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.98595% CI: [0.894, 1.116]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Urine biomarker samples were collected to assess urine phosphate. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine phosphate was calculated as urine phosphate at post-Baseline visit minus urine phosphate calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 24, n=12.9 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 96 and 144

Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144 to assess urine phosphate. Baseline (Day 1) value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine phosphate is defined as urine phosphate at post-Baseline visit minus urine phosphate at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=312, 2860.960 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=313, 2980.890 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=312, 2860.978 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Phosphate at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=313, 2980.912 Ratio
p-value: 0.80695% CI: [0.904, 1.139]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.74595% CI: [0.909, 1.142]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48

Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 to assess urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine. Geometric mean ratio (visit divided by Baseline) and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio has been presented. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio was calculated as Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=344, 3430.860 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=340, 3351.063 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24, n=344, 3430.920 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48, n=340, 3351.068 Ratio
p-value: 0.26495% CI: [0.83, 1.052]Mixed Model Reported Measures
p-value: 0.93295% CI: [0.903, 1.098]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen

Urine biomarker samples were collected to assess urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value was the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine was calculated as urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio calculated at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at weeks 24 and 48

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24 and 48 in Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based RegimenWeek 24, n=11.04 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144

Urine biomarker samples were collected at Baseline, Weeks 96 and 144 to assess urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine. Baseline (Day 1) value is the value from the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio is defined as Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at post-Baseline visit minus Urine retinol binding protein 4/urine creatinine ratio at Baseline. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 96 and 144

Population: Safety Population. Total of 741 participants were analyzed but 740 participants are presented in this Outcome Measure and 1 participant is presented separately in next Outcome Measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=310, 2820.926 Ratio
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=304, 2881.188 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, n=310, 2820.851 Ratio
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Retinol Binding Protein 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, n=304, 2881.227 Ratio
p-value: 0.01195% CI: [1.032, 1.281]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.89595% CI: [0.905, 1.121]Mixed Model Repeated Measures
Secondary

Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 48

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Number of participants who discontinued the treatment due to adverse events have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen. Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 480 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of TDF-based regimen participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen. Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 48

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to study treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other important medical event as per medical or scientific judgment . Number of TDF-based regimen participants with any SAE and common (\>=2%) non-SAEs are presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.Data not collected post week 48 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 48Any non-SAE (>=2%)1 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 48Any SAE0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36

samples were collected up to the Week 36 visit for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted using chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, phosphate and triglycerides. Any abnormality in clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale From Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.

Time frame: Up to Week 36

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen. Data not collected post week 36 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALT, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALT, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALT, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Albumin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Albumin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Albumin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALP, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALP, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALP, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALP, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36AST, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36AST, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36AST, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36AST, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Bilirubin, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Bilirubin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Bilirubin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CO2, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CO2, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CO2, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Cholesterol, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Cholesterol, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CK, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CK, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CK, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CK, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Creatinine, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Creatinine, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Creatinine, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Direct bilirubin, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Direct bilirubin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Direct bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypercalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperglycemia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperglycemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperglycemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperkalemia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperkalemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperkalemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyperkalemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypernatremia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypernatremia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypernatremia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypernatremia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypocalcemia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypocalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypocalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypoglycemia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypoglycemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypoglycemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypoglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypokalemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypokalemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypokalemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyponatremia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyponatremia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36LDL cholesterol, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36LDL cholesterol, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36LDL cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Phosphate, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Phosphate, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Phosphate, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Phosphate, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Triglycerides, Grade 11 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Triglycerides, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Triglycerides, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Albumin, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36CO2, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Cholesterol, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36ALT, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Creatinine, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Direct bilirubin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypercalcemia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypercalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypercalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypocalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hypokalemia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyponatremia, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hyponatremia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36LDL cholesterol, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 36Triglycerides, Grade 20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36

Blood samples were collected up to the Week 36 visit for the analysis of hematology parameters-platelet count, neutrophils, hemoglobin and leukocytes. Any abnormality in hematology parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale from Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those TDF-based regimen participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities in any of the hematology parameters have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 36

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen. Data not collected post week 36 as the participant withdrew from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Leukocytes, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hemoglobin, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hemoglobin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hemoglobin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Hemoglobin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Leukocytes, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Leukocytes, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Leukocytes, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Neutrophils, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Neutrophils, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Neutrophils, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Neutrophils, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Platelets, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Platelets, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Platelets, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Randomized to TBR Arm Receiving TDF-based Regimen With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 36Platelets, Grade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 144

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment.

Time frame: Up to Week 144

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 14423 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 1447 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 48

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Number of participants who discontinued the treatment due to adverse events have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 4813 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to AEs: Up to Week 482 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 144

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 2217 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 49 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 350 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 53 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 157 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 50 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 165 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 2208 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 354 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 144Grade 48 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 2170 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 43 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 319 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 51 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 1102 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 50 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 194 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 2177 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 315 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With AEs by Their Severity Grades: Up to Week 48Grade 46 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 148

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to study treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other important medical event as per medical or scientific judgment

Time frame: Up to Week 148

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 148Any non-SAE (>=2%)307 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 148Any SAE57 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 148Any non-SAE (>=2%)304 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any SAEs and Common (>=2%) Non-SAEs: Up to Week 148Any SAE44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Common (>=2%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs): Up to Week 48

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to study treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other important medical event as per medical or scientific judgment . Safety Population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment either DTG + 3TC or TBR. This population was based on the treatment the participant actually received. Number of participants with any SAE and common (\>=2%) non-SAEs are presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Common (>=2%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs): Up to Week 48Any non-SAE (>=2%)222 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Common (>=2%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs): Up to Week 48Any SAE21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Common (>=2%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs): Up to Week 48Any non-SAE (>=2%)204 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Common (>=2%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs): Up to Week 48Any SAE16 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48

HIV-associated conditions were recorded during the study and were assessed according to the 2014 CDC Classification System for HIV Infection in Adults. CDC classification for HIV were: Stage 1: No AIDS defining condition and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count: \>=500 cells/mcL; Stage 2: No AIDS infection and CD4+ lymphocyte count: 200-499 cell/mcL and Stage 3:Documented AIDS defining condition or CD4+ T-lymphocye count \<200 cells/mcL. Disease progression summarize participants who had HIV infection stage 3 associated conditions or death. Indicators of clinical disease progression were defined as: CDC Category Stage 1 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 2 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 3 at enrollment to New Stage 3 Event; CDC Category Stage 1, 2 or 3 at enrollment to Death.

Time frame: At Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 2 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 1, 2 or 3 to Death1 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 3 to new CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48No HIV-1 disease progression367 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 1 to CDC Stage 3 Event1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48No HIV-1 disease progression372 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 1 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 2 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 3 to new CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 24 and 48From CDC Stage 1, 2 or 3 to Death0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144

HIV-associated conditions were recorded during the study and assessed according to the 2014 CDC Classification System for HIV Infection in Adults. CDC classification for HIV is: Stage 1: No AIDS defining condition and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count: \>=500 cells/mcL; Stage 2: No AIDS infection and CD4+ lymphocyte count: 200-499 cell/mcL and Stage 3: Documented AIDS-defining condition or CD4+ T-lymphocye count \<200 cells/mcL. Indicators of clinical disease progression is defined as: CDC Category Stage 1 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 2 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 3 at enrollment to New Stage 3 Event; CDC Category Stage 1, 2 or 3 at enrollment to Death.

Time frame: At Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, No HIV-1 disease progression364 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 1 to CDC Stage 3 Event2 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 2 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 3 to new CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 1, 2 or 3 to Death2 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, No HIV-1 disease progression365 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, From CDC Stage 1 to CDC Stage 3 Event2 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, From CDC Stage 2 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144,From CDC Stage 3 to new CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, From CDC Stage 1, 2 or 3 to Death3 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, From CDC Stage 2 to CDC Stage 3 Event1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, No HIV-1 disease progression371 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 1 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, No HIV-1 disease progression372 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, From CDC Stage 1, 2 or 3 to Death0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 2 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144, From CDC Stage 1 to CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 3 to new CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 144,From CDC Stage 3 to new CDC Stage 3 Event0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Disease Progression at Weeks 96 and 144Week 96, From CDC Stage 1, 2 or 3 to Death0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144

Plasma samples were collected for drug resistance testing. Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with genotypic resistance to INSTI, NRTI, NNRTI and PI are summarized.

Time frame: Up to Week 144

Population: CVW Population comprises all participants in the ITT-E Population who had met the derived CVW criteria and who had resistance data. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48

Plasma samples were collected for drug resistance testing. Number of participants, who met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with genotypic resistance to INSTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), NNRTI and PI was summarized.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: CVW Population comprised of all participants in the ITT-E Population who had met the derived CVW criteria. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144

Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: ALT, albumin, ALP, AST, bilirubin, CO2, cholesterol, CK, creatinine, direct bilirubin, GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, LDL cholesterol, phosphate triglycerides and lactate dehydrogenase. Any abnormality in clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale From Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.

Time frame: Up to Week 144

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 155 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 211 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 35 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 11 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 16 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 134 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 213 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 33 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 43 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 124 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 33 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 1110 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 142 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 141 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 312 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 410 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 25 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 313 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 2165 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 338 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 346 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 18 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 34 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 13 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 14 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 24 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 121 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 38 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 161 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 29 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 226 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 212 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 121 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 2169 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 41 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 173 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 240 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 114 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 19 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 110 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 23 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 141 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 219 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 23 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 160 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 26 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 36 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 44 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 149 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 156 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 33 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 215 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 41 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 13 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 39 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 15 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 31 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALP, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 110 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 145 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 29 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypocalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 23 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144AST, Grade 43 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 35 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 112 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 24 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 31 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 126 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 197 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 224 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 24 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 29 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CO2, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144LDL cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 170 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypoglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 32 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 171 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 130 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 213 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 312 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144ALT, Grade 29 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144CK, Grade 410 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 112 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Albumin, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 31 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 17 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Creatinine, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 42 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 33 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Cholesterol, Grade 234 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Direct bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypokalemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Phosphate, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 2101 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 324 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 41 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 2183 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 19 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 358 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 41 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Triglycerides, Grade 177 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 177 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypercalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyponatremia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 231 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 34 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Lactate Dehydrogenase Grade 11 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 12 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hyperkalemia, Grade 21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hypernatremia, Grade 30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48

Blood samples were collected up to Week 48 for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted for body surface area (BSA), GFR from cystatin C adjusted using chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, phosphate and triglycerides. Any abnormality in clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale From Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 138 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 2135 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 326 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 17 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 252 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 35 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 41 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 134 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 17 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 24 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 34 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 156 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 221 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 44 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 32 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 127 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 11 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 18 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 212 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 124 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 26 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 15 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 128 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 11 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 24 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 39 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 12 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 46 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 128 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 116 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 23 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 121 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 23 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 27 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 213 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 41 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 18 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 117 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 25 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 36 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 10 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 173 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 38 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 13 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 12 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 11 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypocalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 16 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypoglycemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 113 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 135 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 215 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 33 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48LDL cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 147 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 27 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Phosphate, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 148 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 34 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 152 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 219 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Cholesterol, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 119 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 29 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 38 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CK, Grade 45 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 17 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Creatinine, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 31 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Direct bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 283 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 313 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD EPI,Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 266 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 34 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI,Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypercalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 164 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 219 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperglycemia, Grade 32 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyperkalemia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 11 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypernatremia, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hypokalemia, Grade 11 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 118 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 24 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hyponatremia, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Triglycerides, Grade 211 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Albumin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALP, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 129 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 24 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48AST, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 17 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 31 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48Bilirubin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 170 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48CO2, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Clinical Chemistry Toxicities: Up to Week 48ALT, Grade 31 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144

Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for the analysis of hematology parameters-platelet count, neutrophils, hemoglobin and leukocytes. Any abnormality in hematology parameters are were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale from Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms.

Time frame: Up to Week 144

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 23 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 18 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 17 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 12 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 31 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 15 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 42 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 17 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 12 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 15 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 22 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 28 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Hemoglobin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 14 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Platelets, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Neutrophils, Grade 42 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 144Leukocytes, Grade 30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48

Blood samples were collected up to Week 48 for the analysis of hematology parameters-platelet count, neutrophils, hemoglobin and leukocytes. Any abnormality in hematology parameters were evaluated according to the DAIDS toxicity scale from Grade 1 to 4: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities in any of the hematology parameters have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Safety Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and because the safety profiles of TDF and TAF differ, this participant was removed from the overall safety population and is presented in separate arm Randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 13 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 20 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 11 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 40 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 13 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 22 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 41 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 16 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 21 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 30 Participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 14 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 15 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 10 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 24 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Hemoglobin, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 11 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 20 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Platelets, Grade 21 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 30 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Neutrophils, Grade 40 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities: Up to Week 48Leukocytes, Grade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144

Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with phenotypic resistance to INSTI,NNRT,NRTI and PI were summarized. Assessment of antiviral activity of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) using phenotypic test results was interpreted through a proprietary algorithm (from Monogram Biosciences), which provided the overall susceptibility of the drug. Partially sensitive and resistant calls were considered resistant in this analysis. The phenotypic resistance was calculated using binary scoring system, where 0 was considered as sensitive and 1 as resistance. Phenotypic Resistance data for the following INSTI, NNRTI, NRTI and PI drugs in participants Meeting CVW Criteria has been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 144

Population: CVW Population comprised of all participants in the ITT-E Population who had met the derived CVW criteria. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, Elvitegravir (EVG), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, EVG, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, Etravirine (ETR), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, IDV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Nelfinavir (NFV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, TPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, EFV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, DTG, Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, DTG, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, Bictegravir (BIC), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, BIC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, ETR, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, Raltegravir (RAL), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144INSTI, RAL, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, Delavirdine (DLV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, DLV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, Efavirenz (EFV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, Nevirapine (NVP), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, NVP, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, Rilpivirine (RPV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NNRTI, RPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, 3TC, Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, 3TC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, Abacavir (ABC), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, ABC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, Zidovudine (AZT), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, AZT, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, Stavudine (D4T), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, D4T, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, Didanosine (DDI), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, DDI, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, Emtricitabine (FTC), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, FTC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, Tenofovir (TDF), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144NRTI, TDF, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Atazanavir (ATV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, ATV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Darunavir (DRV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, DRV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Fosamprenavir (FPV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, FPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Indinavir (IDV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Lopinavir (LPV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, LPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, NFV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Ritonavir (RTV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, RTV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Saquinavir (SQV), Sensitive2 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, SQV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 144PI, Tipranavir (TPV), Sensitive2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48

Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria (one plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 c/mL after Day 1 with immediate prior HIV RNA \>=50 c/mL), with phenotypic resistance to INSTI, NNRTI,NRTI and PI were summarized. Assessment of antiviral activity of ART using phenotypic test results was interpreted through a proprietary algorithm (from Monogram Biosciences), which provided the overall susceptibility of the drug. Partially sensitive and resistant calls were considered resistant in this analysis. The phenotypic resistance was calculated using binary scoring system, where 0 was considered as sensitive and 1 as resistance. Phenotypic Resistance data for the following INSTI, NNRTI, NRTI and PI drugs in participants Meeting CVW Criteria has been presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: CVW Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, Efavirenz (EFV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, EFV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, RPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, 3TC, Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, 3TC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, Abacavir (ABC), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, ABC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, Zidovudine (AZT), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, AZT, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Tipranavir (TPV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, DTG, Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, DTG, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, Bictegravir (BIC), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, BIC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, Elvitegravir (EVG), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, EVG, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, Raltegravir (RAL), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48INSTI, RAL, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, Delavirdine (DLV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, DLV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, Etravirine (ETR), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, ETR, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, Nevirapine (NVP), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, NVP, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NNRTI, Rilpivirine (RPV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, Stavudine (D4T), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, D4T, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, Didanosine (DDI), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, DDI, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, Emtricitabine (FTC), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, FTC, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, Tenofovir (TDF), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48NRTI, TDF, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Atazanavir (ATV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, ATV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Darunavir (DRV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, DRV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Fosamprenavir (FPV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, FPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Indinavir (IDV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, IDV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Lopinavir (LPV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, LPV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Nelfinavir (NFV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, NFV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Ritonavir (RTV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, RTV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, Saquinavir (SQV), Sensitive1 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, SQV, Resistant0 Participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance: Up to Week 48PI, TPV, Resistant0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 24. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Percentage values are rounded off.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been presented. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 2495 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 2496 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL (virologic success) was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48 to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to DTG +3TC once daily compared to continuation of TBR over 48 weeks. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been analyzed. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 4893.2 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Week 4893.0 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-3.4, 3.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144.

Time frame: Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144Week 9685.9 Percentage of participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144Week 14485.9 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144Week 9679.0 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL as Per Snapshot Algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144Week 14481.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Week 24

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 24. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Week 240.3 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Week 240.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Weeks 96, 144

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL was evaluated using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 96 and 144.

Time frame: Weeks 96 and 144

Population: ITT-E Population. One participant randomized to TBR but received TDF-based regimen and was presented within the TBR (TAF-based regimen) arm as efficacy of TAF and TDF are comparable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Weeks 96, 144Week 960.3 Percentage of participants
DTG+3TC FDC (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Weeks 96, 144Week 1440.3 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Weeks 96, 144Week 961.1 Percentage of participants
TAF Based Regimen (Early Switch)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Endpoint as Per FDA Snapshot Category at Weeks 96, 144Week 1441.3 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026