Skip to content

Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Optimal Antiplatelet Treatment to Achieve Stroke Avoidance and Fall in Bleeding Events Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure (SAFE-LAAC). Comparative Health Effectiveness Randomized Trial - PILOT Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03445949
Acronym
SAFE-LAAC
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-02-26
Start date
2018-01-23
Completion date
2027-06-23
Last updated
2023-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, stroke, bleeding, left atrial appendage

Brief summary

SAFE-LAAC Trial has been designed to gather data on the most optimal strategy of antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device

Detailed description

Background: Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been shown to be non-inferior to oral anticoagulation in preventing cardioembolic strokes associated with atrial fibrillation. However, an optimal antithrombotic treatment regimen following successful LAAC remains an unresolved issue. The scope and duration of antiplatelet treatment following LAAC are of paramount importance as they may significantly contribute to post-procedural as well as long-term procedural safety and efficacy. Objective: SAFE-LAAC Trial has been designed as a comparative health effectiveness study with the following aims: 1. compare the safety and efficacy of 30 days vs. 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy following LAAC with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device (randomized comparison) 2. compare safety and efficacy of stopping all antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents 6 months after LAAC vs. long-term treatment with a single antiplatelet agent (nonrandomized comparison) Patient population: Patients (n=200) after successful LAAC with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device. Perspective: Results of this pilot trial will provide: 1. data to aid practitioners and guideline writers recommend the most optimal antithrombotic treatment after LAAC, and 2. data to support power calculations for designing future randomized trials. Methodology: SAFE LAAC has been designed as a multicenter (planned contribution of 7 centers in Poland), open-label, comparative health effectiveness trial with central, independent adjudication of events comprising the primary end-point. The first part of the trial is randomized and after 6 months of follow-up continues for another 12 months as a non-randomized study. Timeline: The duration of the trial has been planned for 5 years. The enrollment phase has been planned for 3 years.

Interventions

continuing dual antiplatelet therapy up until 6 months after left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device

stopping dual antiplatelet therapy after 30 days after left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device

continuing long-term treatment with single antiplatelet agent

continuing single antiplatelet agent up until 6 months

Sponsors

Medical Research Agency, Poland
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Successful left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device within 37 days before randomization * Treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid) between left atrial appendage closure and randomization * Participant's age 18 years or older at the time of signing the informed consent form * Participant is willing to follow all study procedures; especially the randomized antiplatelet treatment regimen * Participant is willing to sign the study informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Indications to dual antiplatelet therapy other than atrial fibrillation and/or left atrial appendage occlusion at the time of enrollment or predicted appearance of such indications within the duration of the trial (e.g. planned coronary revascularization) * Indications to anticoagulation at the time of enrollment and/or predicted appearance of such indications within the duration of the trial (e.g. pulmonary embolism) * Known allergy to clopidogrel and/or acetylsalicylic acid precluding its administration as specified by the protocol * Any known inborn or acquired coagulation disorders * Peridevice leak \>5mm on imaging study preceding enrollment * Left atrial thrombus on an imaging study performed after successful left atrial appendage closure but before enrollment * Life expectancy of fewer than 18 months * Participation in other clinical studies with experimental therapies at the time of enrollment and preceding 3 months * Chronic kidney disease stage IV and V * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding; women of childbearing potential who do not consent to apply at least two methods of contraception. This criterion does not apply to women 2 years post menopause (with negative pregnancy test 24 hours prior to randomization if \<55 years old) or after surgical sterilization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy (a composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, left atrial appendage thrombus)17 monthsEvent rates reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Safety (moderate and/or severe bleeding (BARC type 2, 3, and 5)17 monthsEvent rates reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Transient ischaemic attack17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Peripheral embolism17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Nonfatal myocardial infarction17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Cardiovascular mortality17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Moderate and/or severe bleeding (BARC type 2,3, and 5)17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Left atrial appendage thrombus17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Any bleeding17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
New moderate or major (≥4 mm) ischemic brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years)
Change in cognition score as detected by the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE-III)17 monthsACE-III is a screening test that is composed of tests of attention, orientation, memory, language, visual perceptual, and visuospatial skills. The total range of raw score is 0-100. A higher score indicates more intact cognitive functioning
All-cause mortality17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);
Ischemic stroke17 monthsEvent rate reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100\*N events/Total patient-years);

Other

MeasureTime frame
Number of new ischemic brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging17 months
Volume of new ischemic brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging17 months

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactRadoslaw Pracon, MD PhD
rpracon@ikard.pl22 343 43 42
Backup ContactMarcin Demkow, MD PhD
mdemkow@ikard.pl22 343 43 42

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026