Skip to content

Comparison of High-flow Oxygen vs. BiPAP in Type II (Hypercapnic) Respiratory Failure

Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients With Type II (Hypercapnic) Respiratory Failure Treated With High-flow Oxygen Therapy Versus Non-invasive Ventilation With BiPAP

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03443479
Enrollment
324
Registered
2018-02-23
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
2019-07-01
Last updated
2020-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, COPD Exacerbation, Pneumonia, Respiratory Failure, Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Tract Diseases

Keywords

Non invasive ventilation, BiPAP, High-Flow Oxygen Therapy, High-Flow Nasal Cannula, COPD, Hypercapnia, Hypercapnic Respiratory failure, Chronic obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Brief summary

A retrospective cohort study of all patients treated for type II (hypercapnic) respiratory failure with either High-Flow Oxygen Therapy or Non-Invasive Ventilation in a general adult hospital.

Detailed description

We will compare various clinically relevant outcomes in patients treated for type II (hypercapnic) acute respiratory failure (ARF) with either High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) or Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in a general adult hospital. All patients treated with HFNC were treated with an Optiflow device (Fisher&Paykel). Various Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) devices were used during the study period. All ventilatory parameters were set according to the treating physicians' preferences.

Interventions

DEVICENon-Invasive Ventilation

Treatment with Non-Invasive Ventilation by BiPAP. Different BiPAP models are in use. Ventilation parameters set at the discretion of the treating physician.

DEVICEHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula

Treatment with a High-Flow Nasal Cannula. The Optiflow device by Fisher&Paykel used in all cases. Flow and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) parameters at the discretion of the treating physician.

Sponsors

Hôpital de Verdun
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients treated with respiratory failure not responding to conventional supplemental oxygen therapy * Blood venous gas showing partial pressure of carbon dioxide\>50 mmHg before beginning therapy with either NIV or HFNC

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of records of the primary outcome * End-of-life care * Lack of gas before the beginning of NIV or HFNC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure of initial treatment (combined outcome)48 hours post interventionCombined outcome of death or intubation or transition to another treatment modality or unplanned resumption of respiratory support
Death at 48h48 hours post interventionMortality in the 48h following the initial intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of stayFor the whole length of hospital stay, up to a maximum of one year.Duration of stay in the hospital, in days
Mortality at 7d7 days post interventionIncidence of death in the 7 days after intervention
Incidence of intervention changeFor the whole length of hospital stay, up to a maximum of one year.The incidence of patients who switch from Non-Invasive Ventilation to High-Flow Oxygen, and vice versa, due to treatment failure
Duration of endotracheal intubationFor the whole length of hospital stay, up to a maximum of one year.Duration (in hours) of the first episode of endotracheal intubation, immediately following the failed intervention
Incidence of endotracheal intubationFor the whole length of hospital stay, up to a maximum of one year.The incidence of intubation

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026