Common Bile Duct Stone
Conditions
Keywords
Common Bile Duct Stone;, Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration;, ERCP;
Brief summary
ABSTRACT Introduction: Common bile duct (CBD) stone is a common clinical situation, especially in Asia area. Laparotomy and laparoscopic surgical procedure are often used for treatment. This study compares outcomes of different surgical procedures treating for the disease. Methods/design: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial with three treatment arms. One group underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) + intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage ENBD + primary closure of CBD. The other underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and subsequent LC and the third arm underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) + primary closure of CBD. The duration of the entire trial is two years including prearrangement, follow-up and analyses. Discussion: Despite the fact plenty evidences provided by meta-analyses suggests that these approaches would appear comparable. It is hopeful to fully address which would be the better approach with this RCT design.
Interventions
LC + LCBDE + ENBD + primary closure of CBD
ERCP technique + LC
LC + LCBDE + primary closure of CBD
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with age between 18 - 80 years. * Patients diagnosed with gallstones. * Patients diagnosed with common bile duct stone by one of the three exam (US、MRCP and CT). * Patients diagnosed with common bile duct stone by intro-operative cholangiography or transcystic exploration. * Patients understood the trial and accepted one of the three managements.
Exclusion criteria
* Combined with Mirizzi syndrome and intrahepatic bile duct stones * Previous EST/endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) * History of upper abdominal surgery. * Serious heart, brain, lung, metabolic diseases history. * Pregnant women. * Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Adverse outcomes | 24 months | The patients developing complications/ the total patients |
Countries
China