Skip to content

Shared-Decision Making for Hydroxyurea

Engaging Parents of Children With Sickle Cell Anemia and Their Providers in Shared-Decision Making for Hydroxyurea (ENGAGE HU)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03442114
Acronym
ENGAGE-HU
Enrollment
176
Registered
2018-02-22
Start date
2018-07-12
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2025-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children, Only, Sickle Cell Anemia

Keywords

shared decision making, parent-provider communication, hydroxyurea, sickle cell disease

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to understand how best to help parents of young children with sickle cell disease and their clinicians have a shared discussion about hydroxyurea (one that takes into account medical evidence and parent values and preferences). The study will compare two methods to help clinicians facilitate this-a clinician pocket guide and a clinician hydroxyurea shared decision making toolkit-in a group of parents of children ages 0-5 with sickle cell disease. The investigators hope that both methods lead to parents reaching a high-quality, well-informed decision. In addition, the team hopes to demonstrate that parents who experience a shared decision will have lower anxiety and decisional uncertainty. The researchers also expect these parents to be more likely to choose hydroxyurea and that their children will have less pain, fewer hospitalizations, better developmental outcomes, and higher quality of life. The project team hopes to show that the toolkit method is easy for clinicians to use and gives parents the support needed to make an informed decision.

Detailed description

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic blood disorder that places children at risk for serious medical complications, early morbidity and mortality, and high healthcare utilization. In the U.S., SCD primarily affects African-American and Latino children. Hydroxyurea is one of the only disease-modifying treatment for this devastating and life-threatening disease. National Evidence-Based Guidelines recommend the use of a shared decision making approach to offer hydroxyurea to all children with SCD as early as nine months of age. Hydroxyurea uptake remains low because parents lack information about hydroxyurea and have concerns about its safety and potential long-term side effects (e.g. cancer, infertility, birth defects). Clinicians do not have the training or tools to facilitate a shared discussion with parents that provides medical evidence and considers parent preferences and values. The current study compares two methods for disseminating hydroxyurea guidelines and facilitating shared decision-making: the American Society of Hematology's hydroxyurea clinician pocket guide (usual care method) and a clinician hydroxyurea shared decision-making toolkit (H-SDM toolkit). The specific aims of the study are to evaluate the effectiveness of the usual care dissemination method (clinician pocket guide) and the H-SDM clinician toolkit dissemination method on: parent report of decisional uncertainty (primary outcome chosen by parents of children with SCD), parent perception of experiencing shared decision-making, parent knowledge of hydroxyurea, the number of children offered hydroxyurea, hydroxyurea uptake (those with active prescriptions), and child health outcomes (pain, neurocognitive functioning, sickle cell related quality of life and healthcare utilization). Eligible children must be between the ages of 0 and 5 and a candidate for hydroxyurea to participate. The trial will use a stepped-wedge design (clinic is the unit of randomization). The long-term objective of the research team is to improve the quality of care for children with SCD. The investigators propose that suboptimal care for patients with SCD is preventable with the use of multicomponent dissemination methods if developed with key stakeholders and designed to address barriers to high quality care at multiple levels (patient, clinician, healthcare system, and community).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHydroxyurea SDM Toolkit

Implementation tools and visit decision aids

BEHAVIORALClinician Pocket Guide

current hydroxyurea protocol and ASH pocket guide

Sponsors

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Stepped Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis: sickle cell disease 2. Age: birth-5 years, inclusive 3. Eligible for hydroxyurea (genotype SS, Sβ0Thal or other genotype + clinical complications) 4. Child's parent, legal guardian, or designated decision maker (caregiver) must participate in both study visits 5. Child's parent, legal guardian, or designated decision maker (caregiver) must able to read, understand, and speak English

Exclusion criteria

1. Parent/legal guardian has previously been approached OR made a decision about whether to initiate hydroxyurea. 2. Any and all other diagnoses or conditions which, in the opinion of the site investigator or hematologist, would prevent the patient from being a suitable candidate for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decisional ConflictBaseline - after shared discussion with clinicianDecisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item parent-completed survey that measures uncertainty experienced when feeling uninformed about options, unclear about personal values, or unsupported in making a choice. Parents report their level of agreement with each item using a 5 point likert scale (0=strongly agree to 4=strongly disagree). For the total score, items are summed, divided by 16, and multiplied by 25. All subscores consist of 3 items except the Effective Decisions subcore (4 items) that are summed, divided by the number of items (3 or4) and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (feels extremely certain about best choice) to 100 (feels extremely uncertain about best choice) on the total score and all subscores. Thus, a higher score indicates a high decisional conflict.
Dyadic OPTIONBaseline visit - after shared discussion with clinicianDyadic OPTION describes clinician behaviors to involve a patient/parent in decision-making. A total score is calculated which ranges from 0 (no involvement) to 100 (maximal involvement). Dyadic OPTION scores correlate well with OPTION scale (Melbourne et al., 2011); 1 item My doctor and I made the decision together(Légaré et al., 2010). Higher scores indicate that the patient/parent has higher shared decision making competencies.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ages & Stages Questionnaire - Gross Motor SubscaleAfter discussion with clinicianThis questionnaire is a reliable, accurate developmental and social-emotional screener for children between birth and 6 years of age, with a Cronbach α = .60 to .85. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating that the child's development is on schedule.
Hydroxyurea OfferedFrom date of randomization until the date of first documented offering or prescription, whichever came first, assessed up to 7 months1 of 3 responses - completed by the research coordinator based on review of electronic medical record (EMR) data: hydroxyurea was not offered, offered, or previously prescribed.
Hydroxyurea KnowledgeAfter shared discussion with clinicianEight-item survey developed based on the existing literature, the Ottawa Knowledge User Manual, and parent and clinician stakeholders and used in our pilot work. Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more knowledge.
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory - Sickle Cell Disease Module (Peds QL - SCD Module) - Total ScoreAfter shared discussion with clinicianParent report of sickle cell disease (SCD)-specific quality of life (QOL) and pain, as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) SCD Module, which assesses several domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including pain impact, fatigue, pain management, emotions, communication, and treatment adherence. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher HRQOL or higher functioning.
Satisfaction With Decision-MakingBaseline after the shared discussionEight-item survey adapted from the Satisfaction With Decision scale 41 (4 items) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey related to patient experience of care (4 items). 42 Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Since children were 0-5 years of age, parents completed all measures and were considered study participants. Study participants were recruited based on how they met inclusion criteria assessed by Clinical Research Coordinators and approved by participating physicians at 12 academic medical centers between July 2018 and November 2021.

Pre-assignment details

This study was originally designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design. However, the study was amended to randomize participants instead of facilities, resulting in a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial. Of 176 enrolled participants,174 were allocated to either the Usual Care or Toolkit condition (quasi-experimental design), but only 137 completed the study. While parents completed the surveys and provided feedback, only children were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Clinician Pocket Guide
In this condition, sites will provide current guidelines for offering hydroxyurea and use the American Society of Hematology (ASH) pocket guide as a reference. ASH developed 'The Hydroxyurea and Transfusion Therapy for the Treatment of Sickle Cell Disease' clinician pocket guide based on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Evidence Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report, 2014.' Clinician Pocket Guide: current hydroxyurea protocol and ASH pocket guide
166
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)
During the H-SDM toolkit condition, sites will develop methods for identifying Eligible Patients & Monitoring Progress, have the opportunity to use Implementation Tools, and will use the Visit Decision Aids. The H-SDM toolkit has four visit decision aids to support parents in their decision about hydroxyurea: pre-visit brochure, in-visit issue card, after-visit booklet and video narratives {videos of parents telling their story about how they made a decision about hydroxyurea). Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit: Implementation tools and visit decision aids
126
Total292

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyGuardianship Change01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1313
Overall StudyPhysician Decision22
Overall StudyProtocol Violation02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicClinician Pocket GuideHydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Total
Age, Continuous
Child
1.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.333
1.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.547
1.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.425
Age, Continuous
Parent/Guardian
30.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.891
30.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.98
30.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.345
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
Black or African American
79 Participants57 Participants136 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
More than one race
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Child
White
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
Black or African American
74 Participants56 Participants130 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
More than one race
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parent/Guardian
White
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
166 participants126 participants292 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Child
Female
45 Participants32 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Child
Male
38 Participants30 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Parent/Guardian
Female
76 Participants60 Participants136 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Parent/Guardian
Male
7 Participants2 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 940 / 80
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 942 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 941 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Decisional Conflict

Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item parent-completed survey that measures uncertainty experienced when feeling uninformed about options, unclear about personal values, or unsupported in making a choice. Parents report their level of agreement with each item using a 5 point likert scale (0=strongly agree to 4=strongly disagree). For the total score, items are summed, divided by 16, and multiplied by 25. All subscores consist of 3 items except the Effective Decisions subcore (4 items) that are summed, divided by the number of items (3 or4) and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (feels extremely certain about best choice) to 100 (feels extremely uncertain about best choice) on the total score and all subscores. Thus, a higher score indicates a high decisional conflict.

Time frame: Baseline - after shared discussion with clinician

Population: All parents with data for baseline measures (146) were included in the analyses, whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinician Pocket GuideDecisional ConflictSupport21.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Clinician Pocket GuideDecisional ConflictDCS Total Score22.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Clinician Pocket GuideDecisional ConflictUncertainty26.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
Clinician Pocket GuideDecisional ConflictInformed20.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Clinician Pocket GuideDecisional ConflictValues Clarity23.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Clinician Pocket GuideDecisional ConflictEffective Decisions22.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Decisional ConflictValues Clarity21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Decisional ConflictSupport17.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Decisional ConflictInformed16.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Decisional ConflictDCS Total Score19.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Decisional ConflictEffective Decisions19.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Decisional ConflictUncertainty23.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Primary

Dyadic OPTION

Dyadic OPTION describes clinician behaviors to involve a patient/parent in decision-making. A total score is calculated which ranges from 0 (no involvement) to 100 (maximal involvement). Dyadic OPTION scores correlate well with OPTION scale (Melbourne et al., 2011); 1 item My doctor and I made the decision together(Légaré et al., 2010). Higher scores indicate that the patient/parent has higher shared decision making competencies.

Time frame: Baseline visit - after shared discussion with clinician

Population: 145 parents with data for baseline measures were included in the analyses whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinician Pocket GuideDyadic OPTION39.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Dyadic OPTION40.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Ages & Stages Questionnaire - Gross Motor Subscale

This questionnaire is a reliable, accurate developmental and social-emotional screener for children between birth and 6 years of age, with a Cronbach α = .60 to .85. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating that the child's development is on schedule.

Time frame: After discussion with clinician

Population: The data of 120 children with baseline measures were included in the analyses whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinician Pocket GuideAges & Stages Questionnaire - Gross Motor Subscale50.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Ages & Stages Questionnaire - Gross Motor Subscale51.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Secondary

Hydroxyurea Knowledge

Eight-item survey developed based on the existing literature, the Ottawa Knowledge User Manual, and parent and clinician stakeholders and used in our pilot work. Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more knowledge.

Time frame: After shared discussion with clinician

Population: 145 parents with data for baseline measures were included in the analyses whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinician Pocket GuideHydroxyurea Knowledge6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Hydroxyurea Knowledge6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Hydroxyurea Offered

1 of 3 responses - completed by the research coordinator based on review of electronic medical record (EMR) data: hydroxyurea was not offered, offered, or previously prescribed.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented offering or prescription, whichever came first, assessed up to 7 months

Population: 143 children with data for baseline measures were included in the analyses whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Clinician Pocket GuideHydroxyurea OfferedOffered61 Participants
Clinician Pocket GuideHydroxyurea OfferedNot Offered19 Participants
Clinician Pocket GuideHydroxyurea OfferedPreviously Prescribed3 Participants
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Hydroxyurea OfferedOffered32 Participants
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Hydroxyurea OfferedNot Offered25 Participants
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Hydroxyurea OfferedPreviously Prescribed3 Participants
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory - Sickle Cell Disease Module (Peds QL - SCD Module) - Total Score

Parent report of sickle cell disease (SCD)-specific quality of life (QOL) and pain, as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) SCD Module, which assesses several domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including pain impact, fatigue, pain management, emotions, communication, and treatment adherence. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher HRQOL or higher functioning.

Time frame: After shared discussion with clinician

Population: 121 children with data for baseline measures were included in the analyses whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinician Pocket GuidePediatric Quality of Life Inventory - Sickle Cell Disease Module (Peds QL - SCD Module) - Total Score82.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory - Sickle Cell Disease Module (Peds QL - SCD Module) - Total Score82.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Secondary

Satisfaction With Decision-Making

Eight-item survey adapted from the Satisfaction With Decision scale 41 (4 items) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey related to patient experience of care (4 items). 42 Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline after the shared discussion

Population: 145 parents with data for baseline measures were included in the analyses whether or not they attended the follow-up visit or completed additional measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinician Pocket GuideSatisfaction With Decision-Making13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit (H-SDM)Satisfaction With Decision-Making13.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026