Skip to content

Impact of Unexpected Death in Simulation: Skill Retention, Stress and Emotions

Impact of Unexpected Death in Simulation: Skill Retention, Stress and Emotions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03441425
Enrollment
54
Registered
2018-02-22
Start date
2014-11-10
Completion date
2018-06-01
Last updated
2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) Skills, Crisis Resource Management (CRM) Skills, Stress

Keywords

CRM Skills, ACLS, Simulation, Stress

Brief summary

Some educational researchers deliberately induce stress upon learners to in order to enhance retention; this practice is controversial and its utility must be weighed against the negative emotional effects it may have on participants. In this study we investigate the effect of the unexpected death of a simulation mannequin on the retention of non-technical and technical crisis resource management skills and consider the emotional impact of this acute stressor.

Detailed description

Background High-fidelity simulation is an increasingly used teaching tool that is proven to be effective for learning. According to the literature, by gradually increasing stress and emotions, more effective learning can be achieved. However, allowing the simulated patient to die, as a deliberate stressor, is controversial. There is no previous research on the educational effect of letting a simulated patient die. We aim to evaluate the effects of simulated unexpected death on skill retention, stress levels, and emotions. We hypothesize that the occurrence of unexpected death will impact skill retention, and will be associated with higher stress levels and stronger emotions. Methods After Institutional Research Ethics Board approval, 56 residents and fellows of different medical specialties will be randomized to either the intervention (unexpected death) or control (survive) group. Participants from both groups will have to individually manage a simulated cardiac arrest crisis. In the intervention group, the scenario will end by the death of the simulated patient, whilst in the control group the simulated patient will survive. Each participant will be immediately debriefed by a trained instructor. Three months later, skill retention will be assessed in a similar scenario. Crisis management performance of all scenarios will be rated by 2 blinded raters. Biological stress, cognitive appraisal, and emotions will be measured during both scenarios. Implications The impact of simulated unexpected death on skill retention of residents and fellows will provide instructors with evidence to optimize scenario design and approach the role of stress and emotions in simulation-based education.

Interventions

OTHERUnexpected death

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must be a resident or a fellow in the department of anesthesiology, critical care, emergency medicine, medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery or family medicine at the University of Ottawa or the University of Toronto * Participants are requested to refrain from physical strains, smoking, drinking caffeinated or low pH beverages and eating for at least one hour before enrollment * Participants will be included between 11 AM and 8 PM, when cortisol levels are most stable

Exclusion criteria

* Not a resident or fellow in one of the departments indicated above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-technical Crisis Resource Management (CRM) skills3 monthsAssessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical CRM skills3 monthsAssessed using a checklist derived from the American Heart Association's Megacode Checklist
Salivary cortisol5 time points during each of the 2 simulation daysBiomarker of stress
State-trait anxiety inventory3 time points during each of the 2 simulation daysSelf-perceived anxiety questionnaire
Cognitive appraisal2 time points during each of the 2 simulation daysRatio of perceived preparedness versus demands of a task
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)1 time point during each of the 2 simulation daysClassification of emotions experienced

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026