Skip to content

Superior Venous Access, Midline vs Ultrasound IVs

Superior Venous Access, Midline vs Ultrasound IVs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03440944
Enrollment
18
Registered
2018-02-22
Start date
2018-04-23
Completion date
2021-01-25
Last updated
2021-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ultrasound Therapy; Complications, Vascular Access Complication

Keywords

vascular access, midline cather, ultrasound guided IV

Brief summary

Obtaining intravenous access (IVA) is the most common procedure performed in the emergency department (ED). Placement of IVA allows for blood work and delivery of intravenous fluids and medications. The implementation of ultrasound guided peripheral IVs (UGPIV) have allowed for ultrasound to be used to place an IV into patients with difficult vein access (DVA). An alternative device to place is a midline catheter (MC). The use of MCs against UGPIV has not been compared in a randomized study. Aim 1: To determine if UGPIVs have a higher failure rate than midline catheters within 72 hours of placement. Aim 2: To collect information to perform a direct cost analysis of UGPIV against that of the midline catheter. Aim 3: Assess patient satisfaction.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial to determine if the midline catheter is superior to the ultrasound guided IV with respect to survival at 72 hours. Aim 1: To determine if UGPIVs have a higher failure rate than midline catheters within 72 hours of placement. There are several reasons why UGPIVs may fail. UGPIVs are shorter than midline catheters, and shorter catheters may fail due to infiltration which can be a result of malposition as well as having the catheter pull out of the vessel. It is being hypothesized that by using a midline catheter with a guidewire for placement with additional catheter length placed into the vessel, midlines will be superior to UGP\\Vs with regards to survival time of the catheter. The investigators will assess catheter survival daily until 72 hours (when UGPIV are recommended to be changed). The total lifetime of the midline catheters will be recorded. Aim 2: To perform a direct cost analysis of UGPIV against that of the midline catheter. This study will not be large enough to complete a robust cost effectiveness analysis to compare UGPIV to mid line catheters. As a part of this study the investigators will collect information including but not limited to: the number of catheters used for IVA attempts, time for placement of each device complications, and need for additional IVA during hospitalization. Aim 3: For patients that remain hospitalized at 72 hours a satisfaction survey will be administered to determine patient experience and preference for the type of vascular access that they receive.

Interventions

DEVICEUltrasound Guided Peripheral IV Catheter

Patients randomized to this arm will receive an ultrasound guided peripheral IV catheter.

DEVICEMidline Catheter

Patients randomized to this group will receive a midline catheter. The catheter is 10cm in length.

Sponsors

Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Given the devices are different we will not be able to mask.

Intervention model description

randomized to one of two therapies, peripheral ultrasound IV or midline

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient at least 18 years of age being treated in the emergency department at Boston Medical Center * Standard IVA cannot be obtained by two qualified ER staff * Have an upper extremity (left or right arm) that can accept a deep venous IV * Clinical team believes the patient is likely to require inpatient admission at time of needing IV access * English speaking * Able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient expected to be discharged from the emergency department or discharged from the hospital within 1 nights stay. * Prisoner * Pregnancy * Requires central line or midline catheter as an expected requirement of care * Patients who are expected to require medication that is not approved for administration via a peripherally guided IV or midline as defined by hospital pharmacy guidelines. * Patients known to have bacteremia or have a high suspicion of bacteremia * The patient is known or is suspected to be allergic to materials contained in the device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Failures Within 72 Hours72 hours after device placementTotal number and percentage of device failures within 72 hours of placement based on midline and ultrasound guided peripheral IV catheter. Medical record review and in person visits with medical treatment teams and patients were used to assess if device failure occurred within 72 hours. Device failure was determined by needing to have any device replaced or removed for clinical care.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IV Catheter Insertion Timefrom catheter insertionThe time it takes to insert the IV catheter will be documented in minutes for each study participant.
Total Number of Replacement Cathetersfrom catheter insertion up to 30 daysThe total number of replacement IV catheters will be documented. This will be assessed based on each group (Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Catheter and Midline Catheter).
Catheter Related Costsfrom catheter insertion up to 30 daysThe mean costs per patient associated with the placement and replacement of catheters for each participant will be calculated.
Patient Satisfaction72 hours after catheter insertionParticipant experience and satisfaction will be assessed with a short survey that will be given to participants who stay at least 72 hours after catheter insertion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Catheter
Patients if randomized to this group will receive a standard ultrasound guided peripheral IV. The IV is 4.88cm in length. Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Catheter: Patients randomized to this arm will receive an ultrasound guided peripheral IV catheter.
8
Midline Catheter
Patients if randomized to this group will receive a midline catheter. The catheter is 10cm in length. Midline Catheter: Patients randomized to this group will receive a midline catheter. The catheter is 10cm in length.
8
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyNo Acceptable Vasculature01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUltrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterMidline CatheterTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous42 years53 years49 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 81 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Device Failures Within 72 Hours

Total number and percentage of device failures within 72 hours of placement based on midline and ultrasound guided peripheral IV catheter. Medical record review and in person visits with medical treatment teams and patients were used to assess if device failure occurred within 72 hours. Device failure was determined by needing to have any device replaced or removed for clinical care.

Time frame: 72 hours after device placement

Population: Patients who completed therapy within 72 hours were considered non-failure

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterDevice Failures Within 72 HoursDevice Failure within 72 hours6 Participants
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterDevice Failures Within 72 HoursNo Device Failure within 72 hours2 Participants
Midline CatheterDevice Failures Within 72 HoursDevice Failure within 72 hours1 Participants
Midline CatheterDevice Failures Within 72 HoursNo Device Failure within 72 hours7 Participants
Secondary

Catheter Related Costs

The mean costs per patient associated with the placement and replacement of catheters for each participant will be calculated.

Time frame: from catheter insertion up to 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterCatheter Related Costs38.25 US DollarsStandard Deviation 21.95
Midline CatheterCatheter Related Costs28.88 US DollarsStandard Deviation 4.68
Secondary

IV Catheter Insertion Time

The time it takes to insert the IV catheter will be documented in minutes for each study participant.

Time frame: from catheter insertion

Population: Time taken to place each device

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterIV Catheter Insertion Time9 minutes
Midline CatheterIV Catheter Insertion Time17.5 minutes
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

Participant experience and satisfaction will be assessed with a short survey that will be given to participants who stay at least 72 hours after catheter insertion.

Time frame: 72 hours after catheter insertion

Population: Patients who stayed for 72 hours, preference to have midline over ultrasound guided peripheral IV catheter. Patients discharged prior to 72 hours of therapy are not included in the reported results. For the Midline Catheter arm only 3 participants stayed at least 72 hours; 5 participants did not complete the satisfaction survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterPatient SatisfactionPrefer Midline4 Participants
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterPatient SatisfactionUnsure3 Participants
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterPatient SatisfactionNo1 Participants
Midline CatheterPatient SatisfactionPrefer Midline3 Participants
Midline CatheterPatient SatisfactionUnsure0 Participants
Midline CatheterPatient SatisfactionNo0 Participants
Secondary

Total Number of Replacement Catheters

The total number of replacement IV catheters will be documented. This will be assessed based on each group (Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Catheter and Midline Catheter).

Time frame: from catheter insertion up to 30 days

Population: Number of additional IV (including Midline) catheters placed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV CatheterTotal Number of Replacement Catheters13 additional IV access devices
Midline CatheterTotal Number of Replacement Catheters1 additional IV access devices

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026