Skip to content

A Randomized Comparison of Long-Term Healing Between Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus Eluting Stents in STEMI

A Randomized COmparison of LoNg-Term Vascular HealiNg bEtween Biodegradable -Polymer (BP) Versus Durable Polymer (DP) Everolimus Eluting Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarCTion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03440801
Acronym
CONNECT
Enrollment
240
Registered
2018-02-22
Start date
2017-07-03
Completion date
2024-09-01
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the acute thrombogenecity and frequency of neoatherosclerotic lesions and other aspects of long term arterial healing such as the frequency of malapposed and uncovered stent struts at 3 years among patients treated with either a biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Synergy) or a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Alpine) for STEMI.

Detailed description

DES use has significantly improved clinical outcomes as compared with bare metal stents (BMS), primarily through a notable reduction in the risk of repeat revascularisation. However, durable polymer DES have been associated with an increased risk of late and very late stent thrombosis and the anticipated development of in-stent neoatherosclerosis. In addition, in-vivo study suggest that different types of polymer among current DES might have different responses to acute thrombogenecity after stent implantation. Patients with STEMI are associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes due to re-infarction and stent thrombosis throughout long-term follow-up. Underlying unstable lesion which includes ruptured plaque and thin-cap fibroatheroma behind stent strut is a predictor of neoatherosclerosis formation. There is no dedicated randomized trial to comparing biodegradable-polymer versus durable polymer-DES in terms of acute thrombogenecity and long-term healing at 3 years after primary PCI. Therefore this study is designed to compare the acute thrombogenecity and frequency of neoatherosclerotic lesions and other aspects of long term arterial healing at 3 years among patients treated with either a biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Synergy) or a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Alpine) for STEMI.

Interventions

DEVICESynergy

Biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent Synergy

DEVICEXience

Durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent Xience

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
Tokorozawa Heart Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years 2. Primary PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset 3. ST-segment elevation of \> 1mm in \> 2 contiguous leads, or (presumably new) left bundle branch block, or true posterior MI with ST depression of \>1mm in \>2 contiguuoius anterior leads 4. Presence of at least one acute infarct artery target vessel with one or more coronary artery stenoses in a native coronary artery from 2.25 to 4.5 mm in diameter that can be covered with one or multiple stents

Exclusion criteria

1. Female ofchildbearing potential (age \< 50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months), who did not undergo tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy. 2. Known intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, heparin, stainless steel, cobalt chromium, platinum chromium, everolimus or contrast material 3. Inability to understand and provide informed consent 4. Currently participating in another trial before reaching first endpoint 5. Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction 6. Acute myocardial infarction secondary to stent thrombosis or restenosis 7. Planned surgery within 6 months of PCI unless dual antiplatelet therapy is maintained throughout the peri-surgical period 8. Noncardiac comorbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<3years or that may result in protocol noncompliance 9. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy 10. Use of oral anticoagulation 11. Age \>90 years 12. LV-function at index procedure \<=20% 13. Cancer under active treatment (chemotherapy) 14. Hemodynamic instability following primary PCI 15. Chronic kidey disease (Creatinine - Clearance \< 30ml/min) 16. OCT technically not feasible (severe calcification, tortuosity)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of neoatheroslcerosis3 yearsFrequency of neoatherosclerosis lesion which is defined as the presence of a fibroatheroma or fibrocalcific plaques or macrophages within the neointima of a stented segment with a longitudinal extension of ≧ 1 mm at three years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Athero-thrombotic material areainitial dayAthero-thrombotic material area (tissue protorusion + isolated intraluminal detect) within the stent strut after primary PCI

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026