Skip to content

Induction Study #1 of Oral Ozanimod as Induction Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

Induction Study #1 - A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Oral Ozanimod as Induction Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03440372
Enrollment
625
Registered
2018-02-22
Start date
2018-02-27
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2025-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Keywords

Crohn's Disease, Crohn Disease, Oral, Ozanimod, Moderately active, Severely active, RPC01, RPC01-3201

Brief summary

This is a study to explore the effect of oral ozanimod as an induction treatment for participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease.

Interventions

DRUGOzanimod

Specified dose on specified days

OTHERPlacebo

Specified dose on specified days

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Crohn's disease for ≥ 3 months on endoscopy and on histological exam * Inadequate response or loss of response to corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and/or biologic therapies * Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score ≥ 220 and ≤ 450 * An average daily stool frequency ≥ 4 points and/or an abdominal pain of ≥ 2 points * Has Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) score of ≥ 6 (or SES-CD ≥ 4 in participants with isolated ileal disease)

Exclusion criteria

* Has a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, radiation colitis, or ischemic colitis, or has strictures with prestenotic dilatation requiring procedural intervention * Has extensive small bowel resection (\>100cm) or known diagnosis of short bowel syndrome, or requires total parenteral nutrition * Current stoma, ileal-anal pouch anastomosis, or fistula Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12At Week 12Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease. CDAI uses 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), general well-being (0=well to 4=terrible), presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and change in body weight. Scores for stool number, abdominal pain, and well-being are summed over the 7 days before each visit. The other factors are also recorded and weighted to create a total CDAI score, which ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating worse disease (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose CDAI score was below 150 at 12 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12At Week 12The Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) is used to assess the degree of inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease. The SES-CD evaluates four components-size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing-each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe): score ranges from 0-12 across four components and 0-60 overall across five segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum). The total higher SES-CD score indicating greater inflammation. Baseline is defined as the last assessment prior to the first drug administration (based on the time of measurement, if available; otherwise, the last assessment prior to or on the date of first drug administration). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose SES-CD score improved by 50% or more from baseline to Week 12.
Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12At Week 12The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease. CDAI is calculated using 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Scores for stool frequency, pain, and well-being are summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. The remaining variables are also weighted and included in the total CDAI score, which ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating worse disease activity (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose CDAI score improved by at least 100 points, or was below 150, at 12 weeks.
Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12At Week 12The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite score used to measure clinical activity in Crohn's disease. CDAI is based on 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Scores for stool frequency, pain, and well-being are summed over 7 days prior to each visit. The total CDAI score ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating worse disease activity (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease improved at 12 weeks, defined as a CDAI decrease of at least 100 points or a score below 150, along with at least a 50% reduction in intestinal inflammation (SES-CD score).
Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12At Week 12This endpoint measured the percentage of participants who achieved both clinical remission and significant endoscopic improvement at Week 12. Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of less than 150 at Week 12. Endoscopic improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 50% from baseline in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12. The CDAI was a composite score assessing disease activity based on symptoms and laboratory values, while the SES-CD evaluated endoscopic findings in the intestinal mucosa. Achieving both criteria indicated substantial improvement in both symptoms and intestinal inflammation.
Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12At Week 12This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease symptoms and gut inflammation improved at 12 weeks. It includes those with mild or no belly pain (score ≤1), no more than three bowel movements per day (score ≤3), and no worsening from baseline. It also includes participants whose gut inflammation, measured by SES-CD, was low (score ≤4) and improved by at least 2 points. SES-CD assesses inflammation based on four components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing, each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) across five segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum). The total SES-CD score ranges from 0-12 per segment and 0-60 overall, with higher scores indicating greater inflammation.
Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12At Week 12Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as an average daily abdominal pain score ≤1 and average daily stool frequency ≤3, with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. AP was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), and SF was defined as the number of liquid or soft stools per day. This measure reports the percentage of participants who, by Week 12, had low abdominal pain (score ≤1) and three or fewer bowel movements per day, without worsening symptoms compared to when they started the study. Participants began using the diary at the first visit and continued throughout the study.
Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12At Week 12This measure evaluated improvement in gut inflammation at 12 wks using Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS). GHAS was assessed for each ileal & colonic segment (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon-descending/sigmoid colon & rectum). Segment subscores were calculated by adding scores for epithelial damage/tissue changes(0-2), cellular infiltration for mononuclear & polymorphonuclear cells(0-2 each), presence of certain cells(0-3) & erosion, ulcers, granulomas(0 or 1). GHAS score within each segment ranged from 0-16 & across five segments ranged from 0-80. Higher scores indicated more inflammation. Responders with histologic remission was defined as GHAS score ≤8 (each segment) \[meeting criteria: epithelial damage(0), architectural changes(0-2), mononuclear cell infiltration(0-2), polymorphonuclear cell infiltration(0), polymorphonuclear cells in epithelium(0), erosion/ulcers(0), granuloma(0-1) & affected biopsy specimens(0-3)\] & ≤40 (across all segments).
Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12At Week 12This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease symptoms improved meaningfully after 12 weeks of treatment, defined as a decrease of at least 70 points in their Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score from baseline. The CDAI is a composite score used to assess clinical activity in Crohn's disease, based on 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Scores for stool frequency, pain, and well-being are summed over 7 days prior to each visit. The total CDAI score ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe).
Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12At Week 12This measure shows the percentage of participants have no longer any large ulcers (bigger than 0.5 cm) in their gut and in any section of the gut, less than 10% of the surface has ulcers at 12 weeks. This helps to understand how well the treatment is healing the gut and reducing ulceration.
Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12At Week 12CDEIS is an index used to determine Crohn's disease severity by endoscopic exam of the ileum and colon. The intestine is divided into 5 segments: rectum, sigmoid/left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. In each segment, four variables are assessed: deep ulceration, superficial ulceration, percentage of ulcerated surface, and percentage of surface affected by Crohn's disease, using 10-cm visual analogue scales. The presence of ulcerated and nonulcerated stenosis is also evaluated across the entire intestine. These factors are weighted and summed for a total score from 0-44, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. This measure reports the percentage of participants whose CDEIS score improved by at least 50% at 12 weeks, based on endoscopic exam.
Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12At Week 12This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease symptoms and gut inflammation improved at 12 weeks. It includes those with mild or no belly pain (score ≤1), no more than three bowel movements per day (score ≤3), and no worsening from baseline. It also includes participants whose gut inflammation, measured by SES-CD, improved by at least 50% from baseline. SES-CD assesses inflammation based on four components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing, each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe): score ranges from 0-12 across four components and 0-60 overall across five segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum). The total higher SES-CD score indicating greater inflammation.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Mexico, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 625 participants were randomized and of these 623 received at least one dose of study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment 1
Participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg
417
Treatment 2
Participants received ozanimod matching placebo
208
Total625

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
TreatmentAdverse Event168
TreatmentLack of Efficacy42
TreatmentLost to Follow-up10
TreatmentOther Reason23
TreatmentPregnancy10
TreatmentStudy Terminated by Sponsor21
TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject128

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment 1Treatment 2Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
23 Participants9 Participants32 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
394 Participants199 Participants593 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants14 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
391 Participants190 Participants581 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
21 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants6 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
378 Participants188 Participants566 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
210 Participants97 Participants307 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
207 Participants111 Participants318 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4160 / 207
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 41622 / 207
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 41610 / 207

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12

Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease. CDAI uses 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), general well-being (0=well to 4=terrible), presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and change in body weight. Scores for stool number, abdominal pain, and well-being are summed over the 7 days before each visit. The other factors are also recorded and weighted to create a total CDAI score, which ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating worse disease (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose CDAI score was below 150 at 12 weeks.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12Responders31.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12Non-Responders64.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12Responders20.8 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12Non-Responders73.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders5.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.004995% CI: [1.19, 2.7]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12

This measure evaluated improvement in gut inflammation at 12 wks using Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS). GHAS was assessed for each ileal & colonic segment (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon-descending/sigmoid colon & rectum). Segment subscores were calculated by adding scores for epithelial damage/tissue changes(0-2), cellular infiltration for mononuclear & polymorphonuclear cells(0-2 each), presence of certain cells(0-3) & erosion, ulcers, granulomas(0 or 1). GHAS score within each segment ranged from 0-16 & across five segments ranged from 0-80. Higher scores indicated more inflammation. Responders with histologic remission was defined as GHAS score ≤8 (each segment) \[meeting criteria: epithelial damage(0), architectural changes(0-2), mononuclear cell infiltration(0-2), polymorphonuclear cell infiltration(0), polymorphonuclear cells in epithelium(0), erosion/ulcers(0), granuloma(0-1) & affected biopsy specimens(0-3)\] & ≤40 (across all segments).

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12Responders14.9 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12Non-Responders78.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders6.7 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12Responders9.2 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12Non-Responders85.5 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Histologic Improvement Based on Differences Between Ozanimod and Placebo in Histologic Disease Activity Scores (ie, Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Changes) at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders5.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.045295% CI: [1, 2.97]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12

This measure shows the percentage of participants have no longer any large ulcers (bigger than 0.5 cm) in their gut and in any section of the gut, less than 10% of the surface has ulcers at 12 weeks. This helps to understand how well the treatment is healing the gut and reducing ulceration.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12Responders26.9 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12Non-Responders66.8 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders6.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12Responders20.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12Non-Responders75.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With No Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥ 10% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.06795% CI: [0.97, 2.2]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12

CDEIS is an index used to determine Crohn's disease severity by endoscopic exam of the ileum and colon. The intestine is divided into 5 segments: rectum, sigmoid/left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. In each segment, four variables are assessed: deep ulceration, superficial ulceration, percentage of ulcerated surface, and percentage of surface affected by Crohn's disease, using 10-cm visual analogue scales. The presence of ulcerated and nonulcerated stenosis is also evaluated across the entire intestine. These factors are weighted and summed for a total score from 0-44, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. This measure reports the percentage of participants whose CDEIS score improved by at least 50% at 12 weeks, based on endoscopic exam.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders25.5 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders68.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders6.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders19.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders76.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.083595% CI: [0.95, 2.16]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12

This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease symptoms and gut inflammation improved at 12 weeks. It includes those with mild or no belly pain (score ≤1), no more than three bowel movements per day (score ≤3), and no worsening from baseline. It also includes participants whose gut inflammation, measured by SES-CD, was low (score ≤4) and improved by at least 2 points. SES-CD assesses inflammation based on four components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing, each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) across five segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum). The total SES-CD score ranges from 0-12 per segment and 0-60 overall, with higher scores indicating greater inflammation.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12Responders8.7 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12Non-Responders88.0 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders3.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12Responders6.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12Non-Responders91.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and Decrease ≥ 2 Points at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders2.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.297895% CI: [0.73, 2.77]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12

This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease symptoms and gut inflammation improved at 12 weeks. It includes those with mild or no belly pain (score ≤1), no more than three bowel movements per day (score ≤3), and no worsening from baseline. It also includes participants whose gut inflammation, measured by SES-CD, improved by at least 50% from baseline. SES-CD assesses inflammation based on four components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing, each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe): score ranges from 0-12 across four components and 0-60 overall across five segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum). The total higher SES-CD score indicating greater inflammation.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders11.1 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders85.6 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders3.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders7.7 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders89.9 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With an Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Score no Worse Than Baseline and an SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders2.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.189595% CI: [0.82, 2.72]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12

The Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) is used to assess the degree of inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease. The SES-CD evaluates four components-size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing-each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe): score ranges from 0-12 across four components and 0-60 overall across five segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum). The total higher SES-CD score indicating greater inflammation. Baseline is defined as the last assessment prior to the first drug administration (based on the time of measurement, if available; otherwise, the last assessment prior to or on the date of first drug administration). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose SES-CD score improved by 50% or more from baseline to Week 12.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders22.1 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders71.6 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders6.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders18.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders77.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.27295% CI: [0.83, 1.93]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12

Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as an average daily abdominal pain score ≤1 and average daily stool frequency ≤3, with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. AP was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), and SF was defined as the number of liquid or soft stools per day. This measure reports the percentage of participants who, by Week 12, had low abdominal pain (score ≤1) and three or fewer bowel movements per day, without worsening symptoms compared to when they started the study. Participants began using the diary at the first visit and continued throughout the study.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12Responders30.5 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12Non-Responders66.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders3.1 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12Responders21.7 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12Non-Responders72.5 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders5.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.017995% CI: [1.09, 2.43]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12

The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite score used to measure clinical activity in Crohn's disease. CDAI is based on 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Scores for stool frequency, pain, and well-being are summed over 7 days prior to each visit. The total CDAI score ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating worse disease activity (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease improved at 12 weeks, defined as a CDAI decrease of at least 100 points or a score below 150, along with at least a 50% reduction in intestinal inflammation (SES-CD score).

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders16.6 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders78.6 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.8 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders13.5 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders84.1 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders2.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.316795% CI: [0.79, 2.05]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12

The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease. CDAI is calculated using 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Scores for stool frequency, pain, and well-being are summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. The remaining variables are also weighted and included in the total CDAI score, which ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating worse disease activity (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe). This measure reports the percentage of participants whose CDAI score improved by at least 100 points, or was below 150, at 12 weeks.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12Responders48.8 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12Non-Responders46.9 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12Responders39.1 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12Non-Responders55.1 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders5.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.019395% CI: [1.07, 2.15]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12

This measure reports the percentage of participants whose Crohn's disease symptoms improved meaningfully after 12 weeks of treatment, defined as a decrease of at least 70 points in their Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score from baseline. The CDAI is a composite score used to assess clinical activity in Crohn's disease, based on 8 variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Scores for stool frequency, pain, and well-being are summed over 7 days prior to each visit. The total CDAI score ranges from 0-600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease (score 150-219 = mild, 220-450 = moderate, \>450 = severe).

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12Non-Responders40.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12Responders55.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12Responders45.4 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12Non-Responders48.8 Percentage of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 70 Points at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders5.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.017395% CI: [1.08, 2.14]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12

This endpoint measured the percentage of participants who achieved both clinical remission and significant endoscopic improvement at Week 12. Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of less than 150 at Week 12. Endoscopic improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 50% from baseline in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12. The CDAI was a composite score assessing disease activity based on symptoms and laboratory values, while the SES-CD evaluated endoscopic findings in the intestinal mucosa. Achieving both criteria indicated substantial improvement in both symptoms and intestinal inflammation.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: Intent to treat population consist of all randomized participants that received at least 1 dose of investigational drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders16.6 Percent of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders78.6 Percent of Participants
Treatment 1Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders4.8 Percent of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Responders13.5 Percent of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Non-Responders84.1 Percent of Participants
Treatment 2Percent of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 12 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% at Week 12Imputed Non-Responders2.4 Percent of Participants
p-value: 0.316795% CI: [0.79, 2.05]Mantel Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026