Skip to content

Modulation of GABA-A Receptors in Parkinson Disease-Transdermal Flumazenil Arm

Modulation of GABA-A Receptors and Axial Motor Impairments in Parkinson

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03440112
Acronym
GABA-A
Enrollment
34
Registered
2018-02-20
Start date
2018-01-29
Completion date
2021-12-08
Last updated
2023-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Gait, Balance, GABA, Transdermal flumazenil (previously Clarithromycin changed 4/2020), PET Imaging, MRI, Mobility

Brief summary

The arm of this study evaluates possible GABA-A receptor target engagement effects of the FDA-approved medication, transdermal flumazenil (added 4/2020, replaced clarithromycin), in the setting of Parkinson's disease. Half of the subjects will receive transdermal flumazenil for 7-10 days, and half will receive a placebo. \[11C\]Flumazenil GABA-A receptor PET imaging will be used to assess target engagement effects. Note \[11C\]Flumazenil GABA-A receptor PET was not performed as part of the transdermal flumazenil study because of a Covid pandemic research amendment.

Detailed description

This study focuses on neurochemical changes in the brain that occur in Parkinson's disease. In particular we will be looking a neurotransmitter called GABA. In some Parkinson's disease patients we see too much GABA activity in the brain. This target engagement study examines the target engagement effect of GABA-A receptor modulation by transdermal flumazenil (previously clarithromycin). \[11C\]-flumazenil Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging results will be used to assess for possible GABA-A receptor target engagement effects of transdermal flumazenil (previously clarithromycin). Note \[11C\]Flumazenil GABA-A receptor PET was not performed as part of the transdermal flumazenil study because of a Covid pandemic research amendment.

Interventions

DRUGClarithromycin (Not used as of 4/2020)

Clarithromycin (generic) capsule 250mg each

DRUGPlacebo (Not used as of 4/2020)

Lactose in a gel capsule

DRUGTransdermal flumazenil (Added 4/2020)

Transdermal flumazenil 24mg/mL

DRUGPlacebo (Added 4/2020)

Transdermal placebo

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Nicolaas Bohnen, MD, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Participant, Investigator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Parkinson's disease (PD): PD diagnosis will follow the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank Research Center (UKPDSBRC) clinical diagnostic criteria for PD. 2. Hoehn and Yahr stages 2-4 3. Absence of dementia confirmed by cognitive testing. 4. Abnormal 11C-Dihydrotetrabenazine (\[11c\]-DTBZ) PET study to demonstrate nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation

Exclusion criteria

1. PD with Dementia (PDD) or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). 2. Other disorders which may resemble PD, such as vascu¬lar dementia, normal pressure hydrocephalus, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal ganglionic dege¬neration, or toxic causes of parkinsonism. Prototypical cases have distincti¬ve clinical profiles, like early and severe dysautonomia or appendicular apraxia, which may differentiate them from idiopathic PD. The use of the UKPDSBRC clinical diagnostic criteria for PD will mitigate the inclusion of subjects with atypical parkinsonism. 3. Subjects currently on benzodiazepine, GABAB-ergic medications (baclofen, tizanidine), modafinil, neuroleptic, anticholinergic (trihexyphenidyl, benztropine), or cholinesterase inhibitor drugs. 4. Evidence of a mass lesion on structural brain imaging (MRI). 5. Participants in whom MRI is contraindicated including, but not limited to, those with a pacemaker, presence of metallic fragments near the eyes or spinal cord, chest, or cochlear implant. 6. Severe claustrophobia precluding MR or PET imaging. 7. Subjects limited by participation in research procedures involving ionizing radiation. 8. Pregnancy (urine or serum pregnancy test within 48 hours of each PET session) or breastfeeding. 9. History of seizures 10. Significant anxiety or history of panic disorder. 11. History of recent suicide attempt or overdose of tricyclic antidepressants or other medications. 12. History of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke within the last year. 13. History of systemic lupus erythematosis. 14. Abnormal liver enzymes (AST or ALT) \> 3 times upper limit of normal. 15. History of atrial fibrillation. 16. History of retinal branch artery occlusion. 17. Active dermatitis inner forearms. 18. Any other medical history determined by investigators to preclude safe participation. Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 1 (before treatment administration), day 7 (after 7 days of treatment), and day 14 (7 days of treatment discontinuation).We will use the total Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III - motor scale rating scores to assess motor function. Scale from 0-132, higher scores indicate worse motor outcomes. Outcome measure was collected during dopaminergic medication ON state.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 1 (before treatment administration), day 7 (after 7 days of treatment), and day 14 (7 days of treatment discontinuation).MiniBEST sensory subscore measures an individual's ability to maintain balance under conditions of sensory constrain and unstable/inclined standing surface. It is is computed as a sum of MiniBEST items 7, 8, and 9.The score ranges from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating inability to balance under all of the condition, and 6 indicating no difficulty in maintaining balance under any of the conditions (lower score indicates worse balance). Outcome measure was collected during dopaminergic medication ON state.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

5 participants withdrew prior to assignment. 7 participants were recruited for clarithromycin sub-study, which was subsequently dropped in 04/2020 due to concerns related to increased risk of death among the elderly who were taking this antibiotic even for a short time. Only 3 of those participants were randomized and went through study procedures, but the randomization key was not broken so we have no way of knowing what group they were assigned to.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)
Added in April 2020. Subjects will take 18mg transdermal application every 3-4 hrs dispensed as 3 dispenser bottle clicks of 0.25 ml each, while awake for 3 days then if no side-effects subjects will increase to 36mg transdermal application every 3-4 hrs dispensed as 6 dispenser bottle clicks of 0.25 ml each, while awake.
11
Placebo Cream
Added in April 2020. Placebo will be taken exactly as the transdermal flumazenil arm: Subjects will take 18mg transdermal application every 3-4 hrs dispensed as 3 dispenser bottle clicks of 0.25 ml each, while awake for 3 days then if no side-effects subjects will increase to 36mg transdermal application every 3-4 hrs dispensed as 6 dispenser bottle clicks of 0.25 ml each, while awake.
11
Oral Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)
Discontinued April 2020, study aborted. Subjects will take 250 mg twice daily by mouth for 3 days and then - if no side-effects - the dose will increased to 500 mg twice daily by mouth.
3
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalTransdermal Flumazenil (Active)Placebo CreamOral Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)
Age, Continuous70.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43
72.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41
70.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
66.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants11 Participants11 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
MiniBEST Sensory Subscore5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
5.27 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
5.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III43.5 units on a scale45 units on a scale41.5 units on a scale40.50 units on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants11 Participants11 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants11 participants11 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants8 Participants10 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 110 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)

We will use the total Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III - motor scale rating scores to assess motor function. Scale from 0-132, higher scores indicate worse motor outcomes. Outcome measure was collected during dopaminergic medication ON state.

Time frame: Day 1 (before treatment administration), day 7 (after 7 days of treatment), and day 14 (7 days of treatment discontinuation).

Population: Parkinson's disease participants older than 50. Some, but not all, participants in the Clarithromycin arm were randomized, and only few completed study procedures because of premature termination of the trial due to an FDA safety risk warning of Clarithromycin, precluding any meaningful analysis. Consequently, this study arm was replaced by the transdermal Flumazenil arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 736.75 units on a scale
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 138 units on a scale
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 1432.75 units on a scale
Placebo CreamChange in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 731.50 units on a scale
Placebo CreamChange in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 134 units on a scale
Placebo CreamChange in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 1434 units on a scale
Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 128 units on a scale
Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 1422 units on a scale
Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 1 (Clinical Motor Ratings MDS-UPDRS)Day 723.50 units on a scale
Comparison: A pair of random-intercept mixed linear models was fitted, a visit model and an interaction model. Visit model included fixed effect of visit and a random intercept by participant. Interaction model adds an interaction by treatment term on top of the visit model. Null hypothesis is that visit by treatment interaction does not explain significant additional variance in clinical outcome scores. Likelihood ratio test comparing the interaction model to the visit model was used to derive a p-value.p-value: 0.391Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)

MiniBEST sensory subscore measures an individual's ability to maintain balance under conditions of sensory constrain and unstable/inclined standing surface. It is is computed as a sum of MiniBEST items 7, 8, and 9.The score ranges from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating inability to balance under all of the condition, and 6 indicating no difficulty in maintaining balance under any of the conditions (lower score indicates worse balance). Outcome measure was collected during dopaminergic medication ON state.

Time frame: Day 1 (before treatment administration), day 7 (after 7 days of treatment), and day 14 (7 days of treatment discontinuation).

Population: Parkinson's disease participants older than 50. Some, but not all, participants in the Clarithromycin arm were randomized, and only few completed study procedures (baseline visit only) because of premature termination of the trial due to an FDA safety risk warning of Clarithromycin, precluding any meaningful analysis. Consequently, this study arm was replaced by the transdermal Flumazenil arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 75.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 15.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Transdermal Flumazenil (Active)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 146 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo CreamChange in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo CreamChange in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo CreamChange in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 145.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 146 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Clarithromycin (Active or Placebo)Change in Quantitative Biomechanics 2 (MiniBESTest Dynamic Balance Scale Sensory Subscore)Day 75.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Comparison: A pair of random-intercept mixed linear models was fitted, a visit model and an interaction model. Visit model included fixed effect of visit and a random intercept by participant. Interaction model adds an interaction by treatment term on top of the visit model. Null hypothesis is that visit by treatment interaction does not explain significant additional variance in clinical outcome scores. Likelihood ratio test comparing the interaction model to the visit model was used to derive a p-value.p-value: 0.02351Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026