Ankle Osteoarthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The Veteran population is prone to foot and ankle maladies from common injuries such as sprains, and diseases such as ankle osteoarthritis (cartilage damage). More specific to Veterans are prior service injuries of the foot and ankle, which historically account for nearly a quarter of injuries received. These injuries include bone fractures and ligament damage. Some of these injuries may lead to poor ankle joint alignment, which over time could lead to osteoarthritis due to abnormal wear on a day to day basis. The goal of this proposal is to use a novel technology - biplane fluoroscopy, to study the movement of ankles which are misaligned in subjects with ankle osteoarthritis. This proposal will also benefit current diagnostic methods with additional information. Last, this proposal will test the effectiveness of a conservative treatment (modified shoe insoles) to correct or reduce the misalignment in ankles. This proposal will create evidence about: the nature of ankle osteoarthritis, the accuracy of diagnosing alignment, and conservative treatment for patients with ankle OA.
Detailed description
Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating and mobility limiting condition. It can commonly stem from the result of a traumatic injury - such trauma has a high prevalence in military service. If cartilage is not severely damaged in that trauma, the stability and alignment of the joint may be. Over time, an unstable or misaligned ankle joint can experience abnormal rates of cartilage wear and tear due to aberrant kinematics. While OA may take decades to develop, the resulting arthritic state from this trauma will ultimately require ankle replacement or fusion, consequences with a tremendous financial burden and quality of life impact. With regards to alignment, particularly in the coronal plane, current clinical diagnosis relies on static X-ray of the ankle joint. Static images may not indicate dynamic misalignment during gait. Further, the effect of wedged insoles, a potential conservative treatment, on the restoration of ankle function is undocumented. This proposal aims to use biplane fluoroscopy, an X-ray based dynamic imaging approach, to measure ankle kinematics in OA subjects (with varus, neutral and valgus ankle alignment) and controls. With this method, tibio-talar kinematics during gait can be measured. Furthermore, subjects classified as neutral from their static radiograph, but that exhibit ankle varus or valgus alignment during gait, will be identified. Improving the accuracy of a diagnostic outcome provides a patient group with additional avenues for treatment. The investigators will investigate correlations between the investigators' 3D kinematics and clinical 2D imaging - to the benefit of clinical diagnostics. The investigators will also be able to measure the effect of wedged insoles on the restoration of ankle function. With this in mind, the following aims and methodology are proposed. Specific Aim 1: To investigate ankle kinematics in controls and subjects with OA. In support of Specific Aim 1, 90 ankle OA subjects will be recruited (30 each of varus, neutral or valgus aligned ankles). The investigators will also recruit 20 control subjects. Subjects will receive CT scans of their feet to quantify bone geometry (a step necessary for biplane fluoroscopy). Subjects will then be imaged in the biplane system during gait trials and while wearing neutral study shoes. This will yield tibio-talar kinematics during gait for these populations. Specific Aim 2: To identify dynamically misaligned ankles in OA subjects who are currently classified as neutrally aligned using static analysis. The investigators will compare the static X-ray and the gait kinematics of OA subjects, particularly those with clinically determined neutral alignment. The investigators will determine what proportion of neutral OA subjects actually exhibit misalignment during gait and are thus improperly categorized. The investigators will also re-create 2D clinical X-ray views from the investigators' 3D data in an attempt to translate the investigators' improvement (with 3D fluoroscopy) to more accurately classify alignment to clinical 2D diagnostics. Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the potential of lateral or medial wedging to restore alignment in misaligned ankle OA subjects. OA subjects will be imaged wearing shoes with wedged insoles which correspond to their type of misalignment. Neutral OA subjects, who demonstrate misalignment during gait, will be recalled for a wedged insole session. This yields conservative treatment kinematics. This study will generate baseline data describing the kinematics of control and ankle OA subjects. This data is not currently available in the literature, and represents a novel contribution to the field. Second, this proposal determines how accurate current 2D X-ray methods are at detecting dynamic misalignment. This information can inform clinicians about the accuracy of their diagnostic tools, and may lead to improvements. Third, this proposal will generate data to evaluate the utility of wedged insoles for the conservative management of ankle misalignment. In Summary, this study has immediate impact potential on the diagnosis and treatment of ankle OA. Last, there are numerous additional avenues of classification, diagnostic, and preventative research for the benefit of the Veterans which will stem from this Career Development Award. As a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and after consultation with the appropriate research oversight, regulatory and monitoring entities, screening and enrollment has been placed on temporary administrative hold as of 03/16/2020.
Interventions
Two x-ray systems will image the subjects ankle while they walk, allowing us to calculate ankle joint angle and alignment
medial or lateral wedge (appropriate for varus or valgus misalignment) will be applied during 1 data collection session to evaluate effect of wedging on misalignment
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Be ambulatory (able to walk at least 15 m, and tolerate \ 1 hour of standing and walking with rest periods)
Exclusion criteria
* Recent (\<1 year) surgical, neurological, metabolic or lower limb musculoskeletal problem that might impair the ambulation measures in the study * Such as severe knee or hip osteoarthritis * Diagnosed with diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, or peripheral vascular disease * For OA subjects, a radiographic discontinuity of the cartilage of the tibial plafond or talar dome * Also for OA subjects, rapid onset of OA (\<3 years) following ankle fracture * Diagnosis of severe ankle instability or deformity such as pes planus * Inadequate cognitive or language function to consent or to participate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Decrease in Misalignment During Gait Using Wedged Insoles | 4 hour session | The effect that wedged insoles have on varus / valgus misalignment will be assessed using dynamic 3D x-ray |
| Tibio-talar Kinematics During Gait | 4 hour session | The 3D movement between the tibia and talus bones will be assessed using biplane fluoroscopy, for OA and control subjects during shod gait. |
| Static Ankle Alignment Sensitivity | 4 hour session | The sensitivity to correctly diagnose dynamic misalignment by using static x-ray images, will be determined for the OA population. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited from a combination of clinician introduction to the study, and posted recruitment materials in 2 hospital systems (VA and academic). The study was open for recruitment in 2016 but due to a laboratory move and hardware update, the first participant was not enrolled until February 2019. The last participant was enrolled in March 2020, three days before a local hold on in-person research was enacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Pre-assignment details
Of 33 enrolled participants, 32 proceeded into either control or OA cohorts, one participant withdrew.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control Able-bodied, age matched subjects with no foot and ankle pathology
Dynamic 3D bone motion capture: Two x-ray systems will image the subjects ankle while they walk, allowing us to calculate ankle joint angle and alignment | 25 |
| OA (Osteoarthritis) Subjects with ankle OA, with all classifications of ankle misalignment (varus, neutral, valgus)
Dynamic 3D bone motion capture: Two x-ray systems will image the subjects ankle while they walk, allowing us to calculate ankle joint angle and alignment
wedged insole: medial or lateral wedge (appropriate for varus or valgus misalignment) will be applied during 1 data collection session to evaluate effect of wedging on misalignment | 7 |
| Total | 32 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Cessation of research visits due to COVID-19, PI was transferred to a crisis-response department | 25 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | OA (Osteoarthritis) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.0 Years | 55.4 Years | 58.2 Years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 23 Participants | 5 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 17 Participants | 4 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 25 Participants | 7 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants | 0 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 7 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Varus/Neutral/Valgus Alignment Neutral Alignment | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Varus/Neutral/Valgus Alignment Unknown Alignment | 25 Participants | 7 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Varus/Neutral/Valgus Alignment Valgus Misaligned | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Varus/Neutral/Valgus Alignment Varus Misaligned | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Decrease in Misalignment During Gait Using Wedged Insoles
The effect that wedged insoles have on varus / valgus misalignment will be assessed using dynamic 3D x-ray
Time frame: 4 hour session
Population: Measure of changes in coronal plane tibio-talar motion in OA population with and without wedged insoles. Note that this study was terminated before this data was collected, thus no analysis is available.
Static Ankle Alignment Sensitivity
The sensitivity to correctly diagnose dynamic misalignment by using static x-ray images, will be determined for the OA population.
Time frame: 4 hour session
Population: For OA participants, differences between their static alignment classification, and their dynamically measured varus / neutral / valgus status. Note that this study was terminated before this data was collected, thus no analysis is available.
Tibio-talar Kinematics During Gait
The 3D movement between the tibia and talus bones will be assessed using biplane fluoroscopy, for OA and control subjects during shod gait.
Time frame: 4 hour session
Population: Differences in 6 degree-of-freedom motion between the tibia and talus during shod gait (contact phase), between Controls and OA participants. Note that this study was terminated before this data was collected, thus no analysis is available.