Skip to content

A Study of ARRY-371797 (PF-07265803) in Patients With Symptomatic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Due to a Lamin A/C Gene Mutation

A Phase 3, Multinational, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of ARRY-371797 (PF-07265803) in Patients With Symptomatic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Due to a Lamin A/C Gene Mutation (REALM-DCM)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03439514
Acronym
REALM-DCM
Enrollment
77
Registered
2018-02-20
Start date
2018-04-17
Completion date
2022-10-13
Last updated
2024-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Lamin A/C Gene Mutation

Keywords

cardiomyopathy, Lamin Type A, heart failure, ARRY-797, C4411002

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) due to a mutation of the gene encoding the lamin A/C protein (LMNA). The study will further evaluate a dose level of study drug (ARRY-371797) that has shown preliminary efficacy and safety in this patient population. After the primary analysis has been performed, eligible patients may receive open-label treatment with ARRY-371797.

Interventions

DRUGARRY-371797 (PF-07265803)

400 mg twice daily (BID)

OTHERPlacebo

BID

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

During the randomized, double-blind period, patients, Investigators, site personnel and the sponsor personnel directly involved with the conduct of the study will remain blinded to assigned treatment, except for regulatory reporting requirements.

Intervention model description

The study will be conducted in 2 parts: a randomized, double-blind treatment period for at least 24 weeks, followed by an ARRY-371797 (PF-07265803) open-label treatment period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Selected Key Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with symptomatic lamin A/C protein (LMNA)-related cardiomyopathy Class II/III/ or Class IV defined as: * Gene positive for a pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or VUS mutation in the LMNA gene as determined by an accredited clinical laboratory. * Evidence of cardiac impairment in LVEF \<= 50% * Patient will have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D). ICD implanted at least 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment or CRT-D initiated at least 6 months prior to initiation of study treatment and defibrillation function activated at least 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment. * Class II/III patients must have objective functional impairment evidenced by a reduction in 6-minute walk test (6MWT); a. Screening: 6MWT distance \>100 m but ≤450 m, AND b. Day -1 visit: 6MWT distance \>100 m but ≤485 m, AND c. Baseline visit (Day 1): 6MWT distance \>100 m but ≤485 * Class II/III patients must be stable for at least 3 months * Stable medical and/or device therapy consistent with regional American Heart Association (AHA) / American College of Cardiology (ACC) or European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines at the investigator discretion, without change in heart failure drug(s) dose in the past 1 month. * Patients must meet acceptable hematology, hepatic and renal laboratory values within 35 days prior to Day 1 as specified in the protocol. Selected Key

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other form(s) of cardiomyopathy contributing to HF (eg, inflammatory or infiltrative cardiomyopathy), clinically significant cardiac anatomic abnormality (eg,LV aneurysm), clinically significant coronary artery disease (eg, coronary revascularization, exercise induced angina) or uncorrected, hemodynamically significant (ie, moderate-severe) primary structural valvular disease not due to HF, per investigator judgment. * Currently receiving intermittent or continuous IV inotrope infusion, or presence of a ventricular assist device, or history of prior heart transplantation. Participants listed for cardiac transplantation may be enrolled provided transplantation is not likely to occur in the next 6 months. * Myocardial infarction, cardiac surgical procedures (other than for pacemaker/ICD/CRT-D implantation or replacement), acute coronary syndrome, serious systemic infection with evidence of septicemia, or any major surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia within 3 months prior to screening. * Currently receiving or deemed at high risk of requiring chronic renal replacement therapy (eg, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) within 6 months. * Initiation of CRT within 6 months prior to screening. * Treatment with any investigational agent(s) for HF within 35 days prior to Day 1. * Malignancy that is active or has been diagnosed within 3 years prior to screening, except surgically curatively resected in situ malignancies or surgically cured early breast cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma), thyroid cancer, or cervical cancer, or, with prior review by the medical monitor, other early stage surgically curatively resected malignancies with less than a 20% expected 2 year recurrence rate. * Non-cardiac condition that limits lifespan to \< 1 year. * Serum positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, viremic hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) at screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The 6 MWT was an assessment where the distance that a participant could walk on a flat and hard surface in 6 minutes was measured. Participants were asked to perform the test at a pace that was comfortable to them, with as many breaks as they needed, and under supervision of a qualified professional. Study discontinuation & death were incorporated into endpoint definition through ranking in hypothesis testing of treatment difference. Missing data resulting from study discontinuation were imputed using control-based multiple imputation method to estimate treatment effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Week 12, Week 24The KCCQ measured the effects of symptoms, functional (physical) limitations, and psychological distress on an individual's health-related quality of life. It contains 23 items, which assessed the ability to perform activities of daily living, frequency and severity of symptoms, the impact of these symptoms, and health-related quality of life. PL was a single questionnaire with score range of 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better physical functioning status. TSS included frequency and severity of symptoms, and the impact of these symptoms. TSS scores were transformed to a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better health status.
Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12, Week 24PGI-S is a global index that rate the severity of the disease using a 5-point scale. In this outcome the number of participants with improvements in PGI-S the severity of their heart failure symptoms and in the severity of their PL were reported. Measured by the scale of: none, mild, moderate, severe or very severe (listed from better to worse).
Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12, Week 24PGI-C is a global index that rate the severity of the disease using a 7-point scale. In this outcome the number participants with improvements in their heart failure symptoms and in their physical activity limitations?, were reported. Measured by the scale of: very much better, moderately better, a little better, no change, a little worse, moderately worse, very much worse (listed from better to worse).
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24NT pro-BNP is a cardiac biomarker that is released in the blood in response to changes in the pressure inside of the heart. Levels go up when heart failure develops or gets worse, and levels go down when heart failure is stable or improves. This biomarker helps to measure the changes in the severity of heart failure over time in response to therapy.
Composite Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Mortality or Worsening Heart Failure (WHF)Maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was 208 weeks)Defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any event of death due to any cause, or worsening heart failure (HF-related hospitalization or HF-related urgent care visit). Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression model were used for analysis.
Change From Baseline in 6 MWT at Weeks 4 and 12Baseline, Week 4, Week 12The 6 MWT was an assessment where the distance that a participant could walk on a flat and hard surface in 6 minutes was measured. Participants were asked to perform the test at a pace that was comfortable to them, with as many breaks as they needed, and under supervision of a qualified professional.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityMaximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and all Non-SAEs. Grade \>=3 AEs meant severe AEs.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMaximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (eosinophils, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, granulocytes, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, neutrophils, nucleated erythrocytes); blood chemistry (alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, C-reactive protein, calcium, chloride, creatinine, creatine kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor, follicle stimulating hormone, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, magnesium, N-Terminal ProB-type natriuretic peptide, phosphate, potassium, protein, sodium, potassium, thyrotropin, troponin I, troponin T, urate).
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsMaximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)Following vital sign parameters were assessed: diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and body weight. Vital sign abnormalities criteria included: a) systolic blood pressure (mmHg): decrease (change \<= -20, or value \<90) and increase (change \>=20, or value \>140); b) diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): decrease (change \<= -15, or value \<60) and increase (change \>=15, or value \>90); c) heart Rate (bpm) decrease: (change \<= -15, or value \<50) and increase (change \>=15, or value \>100); d) weight: (kg) decrease (Change \<= -7%) and increase (Change \> =7%).
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataMaximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)Following parameters were analyzed: heart rate, QT interval, corrected QT (QTc) interval, Bazett's correction QT (QTcB) interval, and Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval. Criteria for notable ECG values were as follows: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.
Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasBaseline, Week 12, Week 24Arrhythmia assessment: incidence of new and clinically significant ventricular or atrial arrhythmias was assessed by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) applicable device interrogations.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization up to death due to any cause or censored date, maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)OS was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who did not have a death date were censored for OS at their last contact date. Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression model were used for analysis.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 77 participants with Lamin A/C protein (LMNA)-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in New York heart association (NYHA) functional Class II and III were enrolled in the study. All participants enrolled received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)
Participants were randomized to receive PF-07265803 400 mg (4\*100 mg tablets) twice daily (BID).
40
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matched to PF-07265803 BID.
37
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-Blind Treatment PeriodDeath12
Double-Blind Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up20
Double-Blind Treatment PeriodOther41
Double-Blind Treatment PeriodStudy Termination by Sponsor2932
Double-Blind Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)PlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
18-34 years
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Age, Customized
35-49 years
15 Participants10 Participants25 Participants
Age, Customized
50-64 years
17 Participants19 Participants36 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants33 Participants70 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants36 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 403 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 4027 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 4021 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24

The 6 MWT was an assessment where the distance that a participant could walk on a flat and hard surface in 6 minutes was measured. Participants were asked to perform the test at a pace that was comfortable to them, with as many breaks as they needed, and under supervision of a qualified professional. Study discontinuation & death were incorporated into endpoint definition through ranking in hypothesis testing of treatment difference. Missing data resulting from study discontinuation were imputed using control-based multiple imputation method to estimate treatment effect.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Efficacy analysis set (EAS): NYHA functional Class II / III randomized participants. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = participants evaluable for the outcome measure. Five participants (ARRY-371797 \[n=3\], placebo \[n=2\]) discontinued the study before week 24 due to the sponsor's decision to terminate and were excluded from the primary analysis. All participants reported under 'Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Baseline402.500 Meter
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Week 24420.234 Meter
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Week 24 change from baseline20.996 Meter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Baseline393.935 Meter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Week 24393.455 Meter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) at Week 24Week 24 change from baseline2.679 Meter
p-value: 0.81895% CI: [-24.246, 34.118]Van Elteren test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6 MWT at Weeks 4 and 12

The 6 MWT was an assessment where the distance that a participant could walk on a flat and hard surface in 6 minutes was measured. Participants were asked to perform the test at a pace that was comfortable to them, with as many breaks as they needed, and under supervision of a qualified professional.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12

Population: EAS included all NYHA functional Class II or III randomized participants. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in 6 MWT at Weeks 4 and 12Change at Week 415.40 Meter
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in 6 MWT at Weeks 4 and 12Change at Week 1221.47 Meter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6 MWT at Weeks 4 and 12Change at Week 4-2.60 Meter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6 MWT at Weeks 4 and 12Change at Week 1210.00 Meter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24

The KCCQ measured the effects of symptoms, functional (physical) limitations, and psychological distress on an individual's health-related quality of life. It contains 23 items, which assessed the ability to perform activities of daily living, frequency and severity of symptoms, the impact of these symptoms, and health-related quality of life. PL was a single questionnaire with score range of 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better physical functioning status. TSS included frequency and severity of symptoms, and the impact of these symptoms. TSS scores were transformed to a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better health status.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: EAS included all NYHA functional Class II or III randomized participants. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 Physical Limitation (PL)4.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.373
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 Physical Limitation (PL)2.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.51
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 Total Symptom Score (TSS)3.66 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.487
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 Total Symptom Score (TSS)4.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.171
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 Total Symptom Score (TSS)-0.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.981
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 Physical Limitation (PL)-1.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.326
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 Total Symptom Score (TSS)1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.491
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation (PL) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) Domain Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 Physical Limitation (PL)1.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.104
Secondary

Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

NT pro-BNP is a cardiac biomarker that is released in the blood in response to changes in the pressure inside of the heart. Levels go up when heart failure develops or gets worse, and levels go down when heart failure is stable or improves. This biomarker helps to measure the changes in the severity of heart failure over time in response to therapy.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24

Population: EAS included all NYHA functional Class II or III randomized participants. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-43.89 picomoles per literStandard Deviation 65.465
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-36.40 picomoles per literStandard Deviation 69.228
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Change at Week 245.00 picomoles per literStandard Deviation 236.643
PlaceboChange From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-3.07 picomoles per literStandard Deviation 62.745
PlaceboChange From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.70 picomoles per literStandard Deviation 54.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Change at Week 2424.37 picomoles per literStandard Deviation 134.225
Secondary

Composite Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Mortality or Worsening Heart Failure (WHF)

Defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any event of death due to any cause, or worsening heart failure (HF-related hospitalization or HF-related urgent care visit). Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression model were used for analysis.

Time frame: Maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was 208 weeks)

Population: The safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Composite Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Mortality or Worsening Heart Failure (WHF)NA Weeks
PlaceboComposite Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Mortality or Worsening Heart Failure (WHF)NA Weeks
p-value: 0.225795% CI: [0.13, 1.39]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital Signs

Following vital sign parameters were assessed: diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and body weight. Vital sign abnormalities criteria included: a) systolic blood pressure (mmHg): decrease (change \<= -20, or value \<90) and increase (change \>=20, or value \>140); b) diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): decrease (change \<= -15, or value \<60) and increase (change \>=15, or value \>90); c) heart Rate (bpm) decrease: (change \<= -15, or value \<50) and increase (change \>=15, or value \>100); d) weight: (kg) decrease (Change \<= -7%) and increase (Change \> =7%).

Time frame: Maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Decrease22 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsHeart Rate (bpm): Decrease7 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Decrease28 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsHeart Rate (bpm): Increase15 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Increase6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsWeight (kg): Decrease10 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsWeight (kg): Increase5 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Increase7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsWeight (kg): Increase1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Decrease17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Increase14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Decrease22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Increase18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsHeart Rate (bpm): Decrease9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsHeart Rate (bpm): Increase10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Abnormal Vital SignsWeight (kg): Decrease7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data

Following parameters were analyzed: heart rate, QT interval, corrected QT (QTc) interval, Bazett's correction QT (QTcB) interval, and Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval. Criteria for notable ECG values were as follows: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.

Time frame: Maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): Increase from baseline >3012 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): Increase from baseline >3011 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): New >48010 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): Increase from baseline >603 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): New >4505 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): New >4507 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): New >48011 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): New >50011 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): New >5002 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): New >4809 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): Increase from baseline >308 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): New >4505 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): Increase from baseline >602 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): New >5008 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataHeart rate (bpm): New <601 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): Increase from baseline >605 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataHeart rate (bpm): New <600 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): New >4504 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): New >4804 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): New >5002 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): Increase from baseline >304 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcB (msec): Increase from baseline >601 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): New >4502 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): New >4803 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): New >5004 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): Increase from baseline >304 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF (msec): Increase from baseline >600 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): New >4504 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): New >4801 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): New >5001 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): Increase from baseline >303 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT (msec): Increase from baseline >600 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial Arrhythmias

Arrhythmia assessment: incidence of new and clinically significant ventricular or atrial arrhythmias was assessed by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) applicable device interrogations.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasBaseline: Clinically significant atrial arrhythmia0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 12: Clinically significant atrial arrhythmia0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 24: Clinically significant atrial arrhythmia0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasBaseline: Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 12: Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 24: Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 12: Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasBaseline: Clinically significant atrial arrhythmia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasBaseline: Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 12: Clinically significant atrial arrhythmia2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 24: Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a New Clinically Significant Ventricular or Atrial ArrhythmiasWeek 24: Clinically significant atrial arrhythmia0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

PGI-C is a global index that rate the severity of the disease using a 7-point scale. In this outcome the number participants with improvements in their heart failure symptoms and in their physical activity limitations?, were reported. Measured by the scale of: very much better, moderately better, a little better, no change, a little worse, moderately worse, very much worse (listed from better to worse).

Time frame: Week 12, Week 24

Population: EAS included all NYHA functional Class II or III randomized participants. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Better0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Worse3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Better3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Better3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Better3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Better3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsNo Change24 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Better7 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Worse0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Worse1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Worse3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsNo Change16 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Worse0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsNo Change18 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Better1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Worse0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Better3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Worse1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Better3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Worse1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsNo Change19 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Better7 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Worse1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Worse0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Worse1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Better1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Worse0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Better0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Better2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Better1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Better9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsNo Change17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Worse2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Better1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Better2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Better6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsNo Change16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsA Little Worse2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsModerately Worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in heart failure symptomsVery Much Worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Better1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Better2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Better5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsNo Change21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsVery Much Better1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Better0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Better4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsNo Change20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsA Little Worse3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Overall change in physical activity limitationsModerately Worse1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

PGI-S is a global index that rate the severity of the disease using a 5-point scale. In this outcome the number of participants with improvements in PGI-S the severity of their heart failure symptoms and in the severity of their PL were reported. Measured by the scale of: none, mild, moderate, severe or very severe (listed from better to worse).

Time frame: Week 12, Week 24

Population: EAS included all NYHA functional Class II or III randomized participants. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows of respective arms.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsVery Severe0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsNone4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsMild16 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsModerate8 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsSevere4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsVery Severe1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsNone4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsMild11 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsModerate10 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsSevere3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsNone6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsMild11 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsModerate12 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsSevere3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsVery Severe1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsNone6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsMild5 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsModerate13 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsSevere4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsVery Severe0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsModerate15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsVery Severe0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsNone7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsNone5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsNone6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsMild14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsMild5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsModerate10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsVery Severe0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsSevere2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsModerate15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of heart failure symptomsVery Severe1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsMild7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsNone6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsSevere4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsMild10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of physical activity limitationsSevere3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsModerate12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12: Severity of physical activity limitationsVery Severe1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24: Severity of heart failure symptomsSevere3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (eosinophils, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, granulocytes, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, neutrophils, nucleated erythrocytes); blood chemistry (alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, C-reactive protein, calcium, chloride, creatinine, creatine kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor, follicle stimulating hormone, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, magnesium, N-Terminal ProB-type natriuretic peptide, phosphate, potassium, protein, sodium, potassium, thyrotropin, troponin I, troponin T, urate).

Time frame: Maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocytes: Low (Males: < 4.63, Females: <3.7) 10^12/L14 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase: LOW (Males: < 43; Females: <30) U/L3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesEosinophils: High (>0.8) 10^9/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase: HIGH (> 115) U/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes: Low (< 0.9) 10^9/L3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase: HIGH (Males: > 43; Females: > 36) U/L11 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocytes: High (Males: > 6.08, Females: > 5.2) 10^12/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBicarbonate: LOW (< 21) mmol/L9 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes: Low (> 3.6) 10^9/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBicarbonate: HIGH (> 33) mmol/L0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: Low (<27) pg6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen: HIGH (> 7.14) mmol/L28 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes/Leukocytes: Low (< 12) %3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCalcium: LOW (< 2.12) mmol/L0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocytes Distribution Width: High (>14.5) %22 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCalcium: HIGH (> 2.62) mmol/L0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes/Leukocytes: High (> 46) %2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesChloride: LOW (< 95) mmol/L2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesC Reactive Protein: HIGH (> 47.6) nmol/L20 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase: LOW (< 24) U/L0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMean Platelet Volume: Low (< 9.6) fL5 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase: HIGH (Males: > 207; Females: > 169) U/L20 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHematocrit: Low (Males: <0.37, Females: <0.33) L/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine: LOW (< 62) mcmol/L14 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMean Platelet Volume: High (> 13.8) fL3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine: HIGH (> 124) mcmol/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: High (>34) pg0 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine Clearance: LOW (Males: < 85; Females: <75) mL/min9 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMonocytes: High (> 1.2) 10^9/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine Clearance: HIGH (Males: > 125; Females: > 115) mL/min16 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHematocrit: High (Males: >0.51, Females: >0.47) L/L12 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesDirect Bilirubin: HIGH (> 6.8) mcmol/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMonocytes/Leukocytes: High (>11) %11 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor: LOW (Males: < 60) mL/min/1.73m21 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesEosinophils/Leukocytes: High (>7) %1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesFollicle Stimulating Hormone: HIGH (Males: > 12.4; Females: > 21.5) IU/L2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNeutrophils: LOW (< 1.7) 10^9/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGamma Glutamyl Transferase: LOW (Males: < 10; Females: <5) U/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHemoglobin: Low (Males: < 125; Females: <110) g/L7 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGamma Glutamyl Transferase: HIGH (Males: > 49; Females: > 32) U/L15 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNeutrophils: HIGH (> 7.9) 10^9/L8 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGlucose: LOW (Males < 3.94, Females < 3.33) mmol/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: Low (Males <78, Females <82)2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGlucose: HIGH (Males > 7.66, Females > 6.38) mmol/L10 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNeutrophils/Leukocytes: HIGH (> 71) %16 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMagnesium: HIGH (> 1.05) mmol/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHemoglobin: High (Males: > 170; Females: > 155) g/L5 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesN-Terminal ProB-type Natriuretic Peptide: HIGH (> 14.63) pmol/L40 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNucleated Erythrocytes: HIGH (> 0.01) 10^9/L6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPhosphate: LOW (< 0.81) mmol/L6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBilirubin: HIGH (> 18.8) mcmol/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPhosphate: HIGH (> 1.45) mmol/L8 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNucleated Erythrocytes/Leukocytes: HIGH (> 0.2) %6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPotassium: LOW (< 3.5) mmol/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesImmature Granulocytes: High (> 0.07) 10^9/L9 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPotassium: HIGH (> 5) mmol/L7 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPlatelets: LOW (< 163) 10^9/L13 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesProtein: LOW (< 60) g/L2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: High (Males >100, Females >102)10 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesProtein: High (> 80) g/L2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPlatelets: HIGH (> 375) 10^9/L2 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesSodium: HIGH (> 145) mmol/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesImmature Granulocytes/Leukocytes: High (> 1) %6 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesThyrotropin: LOW (< 0.27) mIU/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase: LOW (< 10) U/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesThyrotropin: HIGH (> 4.2) mIU/L5 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration: Low (<310) g/L30 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesTroponin I: HIGH (> 0.3) mcg/L4 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase: HIGH (Males: > 40; Females: > 33) U/L18 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesTroponin T: HIGH (> 14) ng/L36 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLeukocytes: Low (< 3.7) 10^9/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesUrate: LOW (Males: < 0.238; Females: <0.119) mmol/L3 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlbumin: LOW (< 35) g/L1 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesUrate: HIGH (Males: > 0.476; Females: > 0.357) mmol/L9 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLeukocytes: High (> 11) 10^9/L9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesUrate: HIGH (Males: > 0.476; Females: > 0.357) mmol/L17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBilirubin: HIGH (> 18.8) mcmol/L12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesC Reactive Protein: HIGH (> 47.6) nmol/L19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesEosinophils: High (>0.8) 10^9/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesEosinophils/Leukocytes: High (>7) %1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration: Low (<310) g/L29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: Low (<27) pg3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: High (>34) pg1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: Low (Males <78, Females <82)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: High (Males >100, Females >102)15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocytes: Low (Males: < 4.63, Females: <3.7) 10^12/L16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocytes: High (Males: > 6.08, Females: > 5.2) 10^12/L4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesErythrocytes Distribution Width: High (>14.5) %20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHematocrit: Low (Males: <0.37, Females: <0.33) L/L3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHematocrit: High (Males: >0.51, Females: >0.47) L/L15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHemoglobin: Low (Males: < 125; Females: <110) g/L5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesHemoglobin: High (Males: > 170; Females: > 155) g/L4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesImmature Granulocytes: High (> 0.07) 10^9/L7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesImmature Granulocytes/Leukocytes: High (> 1) %6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLeukocytes: Low (< 3.7) 10^9/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLeukocytes: High (> 11) 10^9/L8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes: Low (< 0.9) 10^9/L4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes: Low (> 3.6) 10^9/L2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes/Leukocytes: Low (< 12) %3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesLymphocytes/Leukocytes: High (> 46) %1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMean Platelet Volume: Low (< 9.6) fL0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMean Platelet Volume: High (> 13.8) fL3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMonocytes: High (> 1.2) 10^9/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMonocytes/Leukocytes: High (>11) %10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNeutrophils: LOW (< 1.7) 10^9/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNeutrophils: HIGH (> 7.9) 10^9/L5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNeutrophils/Leukocytes: HIGH (> 71) %17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNucleated Erythrocytes: HIGH (> 0.01) 10^9/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesNucleated Erythrocytes/Leukocytes: HIGH (> 0.2) %1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPlatelets: LOW (< 163) 10^9/L11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPlatelets: HIGH (> 375) 10^9/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase: LOW (< 10) U/L5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase: HIGH (Males: > 40; Females: > 33) U/L17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlbumin: LOW (< 35) g/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase: LOW (Males: < 43; Females: <30) U/L5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase: HIGH (> 115) U/L5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase: HIGH (Males: > 43; Females: > 36) U/L8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBicarbonate: LOW (< 21) mmol/L12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBicarbonate: HIGH (> 33) mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen: HIGH (> 7.14) mmol/L27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCalcium: LOW (< 2.12) mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCalcium: HIGH (> 2.62) mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesChloride: LOW (< 95) mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase: LOW (< 24) U/L2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase: HIGH (Males: > 207; Females: > 169) U/L12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine: LOW (< 62) mcmol/L13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine: HIGH (> 124) mcmol/L6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine Clearance: LOW (Males: < 85; Females: <75) mL/min8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesCreatinine Clearance: HIGH (Males: > 125; Females: > 115) mL/min14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesDirect Bilirubin: HIGH (> 6.8) mcmol/L8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor: LOW (Males: < 60) mL/min/1.73m20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesFollicle Stimulating Hormone: HIGH (Males: > 12.4; Females: > 21.5) IU/L4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGamma Glutamyl Transferase: LOW (Males: < 10; Females: <5) U/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGamma Glutamyl Transferase: HIGH (Males: > 49; Females: > 32) U/L27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGlucose: LOW (Males < 3.94, Females < 3.33) mmol/L4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesGlucose: HIGH (Males > 7.66, Females > 6.38) mmol/L10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesMagnesium: HIGH (> 1.05) mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesN-Terminal ProB-type Natriuretic Peptide: HIGH (> 14.63) pmol/L37 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPhosphate: LOW (< 0.81) mmol/L6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPhosphate: HIGH (> 1.45) mmol/L4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPotassium: LOW (< 3.5) mmol/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesPotassium: HIGH (> 5) mmol/L16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesProtein: LOW (< 60) g/L3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesProtein: High (> 80) g/L3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesSodium: HIGH (> 145) mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesThyrotropin: LOW (< 0.27) mIU/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesThyrotropin: HIGH (> 4.2) mIU/L5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesTroponin I: HIGH (> 0.3) mcg/L6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesTroponin T: HIGH (> 14) ng/L34 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesUrate: LOW (Males: < 0.238; Females: <0.119) mmol/L2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and all Non-SAEs. Grade \>=3 AEs meant severe AEs.

Time frame: Maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityParticipants with TEAEs35 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityParticipants with serious TEAEs10 Participants
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityParticipants with severe (Grades >=3) TEAEs16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityParticipants with TEAEs34 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityParticipants with serious TEAEs21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and by SeverityParticipants with severe (Grades >=3) TEAEs20 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who did not have a death date were censored for OS at their last contact date. Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression model were used for analysis.

Time frame: From randomization up to death due to any cause or censored date, maximum up to 212.28 weeks (maximum exposure was of 208 weeks)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention regardless of NYHA functional class.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PF-07265803 (ARRY-371797)Overall Survival (OS)NA Weeks
PlaceboOverall Survival (OS)NA Weeks
p-value: 0.83795% CI: [0.3, 4.63]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026