Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Obeticholic Acid in Subjects With Compensated Cirrhosis Due to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Obeticholic Acid in Subjects With Compensated Cirrhosis Due to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03439254
Acronym
REVERSE
Enrollment
919
Registered
2018-02-20
Start date
2017-08-30
Completion date
2022-09-08
Last updated
2023-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Compensated Cirrhosis, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Keywords

Compensated Cirrhosis, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Fatty Liver Disease, NASH

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether obeticholic acid (OCA; INT-747) can lead to histological improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH in adults with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH.

Interventions

DRUGObeticholic acid (10 mg)

Tablets administered orally once daily.

DRUGObeticholic acid (10 mg to 25 mg)

Tablets administered orally once daily.

DRUGPlacebo

Tablets administered orally once daily.

Sponsors

Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key inclusion criteria: 1\. Subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of NASH and a fibrosis score of 4 based upon the NASH CRN scoring system determined by central reading Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Current or past history of a clinically evident hepatic decompensation event, such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), or variceal bleeding 2. Current or past history of CP score ≥7 points 3. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score \> 12 4. ALT ≥ 5 X ULN 5. Calculated creatinine clearance \<60mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault method 6. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 9.5 % 7. Evidence of other known forms of chronic liver disease such as alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, PBC, PSC, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson disease, iron overload, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, drug-induced liver injury, known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 8. History of liver transplant, or current placement on a liver transplant list

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15Up to 12 monthsMELD was a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease and to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. It uses the participant's values for total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time to predict survival. MELD score ranges from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) with scores and mortality probability being: Score 40=71.3% mortality; Scores 30-39=52.6% mortality; Scores 20-29=19.6% mortality; Scores10-19=6.0% mortality; Score 9 or less=1.9% mortality. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for MELD score ≥15 is presented.
OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause MortalityUp to Month 12All-cause mortality is defined as death due to any cause. Number of participants reporting all-cause mortality is presented
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathUp to 12 monthsAdjudication was performed under the review of Hepatic Safety Adjudication Committee (HSAC) of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for the following is presented: Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention), Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-liver related death.
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh ScoreUp to 12 monthsThe Child-Pugh classification was a scoring system used for the classification of the severity of cirrhosis. It included three continuous variables (bilirubin, albumin, and international normalized ratio) and two discrete variables (ascites and encephalopathy). Each variable was scored 1-3 with 3 indicating most severe derangement. The determination of Child-Pugh score ranged from 5 to 15. The higher the score, the sicker the participant. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for worsening of Child-Pugh score is presented.
DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)Up to 18 monthsFibrosis stage was evaluated by NASH Clinical Research Network(CRN)Fibrosis Staging System with stages:0=no fibrosis;1=perisinusoidal/periportal;1A=mild,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1B=moderate,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1C=portal/periportal;2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal;3=bridging fibrosis;4=cirrhosis.No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) categories.NAS is semiquantitative scoring system based on unweighted sum of:steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%),lobular inflammation(0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x),hepatocellular ballooning(0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning)scores.Total scale range:0-12;0:no features of fatty liver disease and 12:highest degree of fatty liver disease.Higher scores:worse symptoms.Responders:did not discontinue treatment due to Adverse event(AE) or did not die and had evaluable post-Baseline biopsy assessment
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 12 monthsAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.
OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)Baseline and up to Month 12Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled transient elastography (TE) method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the investigational product (IP). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[Units per Liter {U/L}\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP). Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DB Phase: FIB-4 at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, ALT and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, AST and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
DB Phase: ELF at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised HA, TIMP1 and PIIINP. Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSMBaseline and up to Month 18Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled TE method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. The principal comparison was at Month 18. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at a total of around 286 centers.

Pre-assignment details

This was a Phase 3, double-Blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Obeticholic Acid (OCA) in participants with compensated cirrhosis due to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). The study comprised of a double-blind (DB) phase (18 months) followed by Open-label extension (OLE) phase (12 months).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DB: Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive placebo once daily orally with water, in conjunction with local standard of care.
313
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)
Participants were randomized to receive OCA 10 mg once daily dosing orally with water, in conjunction with local standard of care.
296
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg
Participants were randomized to receive OCA 10 mg for the first 3 months prior to uptitrating to OCA 25 mg at Month 3, once daily dosing orally with water, in conjunction with local standard of care. Uptitration was determined based on the laboratory criteria and safety and tolerability assessments completed prior to Month 3. If uptitration at Month 3 was feasible, the window for uptitration was extended by up to one calendar month, after consultation and agreement with the Medical Monitor.
310
Total919

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Adverse Event111215000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Covid-19 Non Adverse Event (AE) Related Issues100000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Death122000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Drug Holiday001000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Lost to Follow-up015000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Non-Compliance With Study Drug100000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Participant moved to Kansas100000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Physician Decision001000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Progressive Disease100000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Site closure001000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Site cover and participant was not willing to be transferred100000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Spouse underwent surgery and participant was unable to take IP regularly001000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Stopped Investigational product (IP) due to an AE in Australia010000
Double-blind Phase (18 Months)Withdrawal by Subject1269000
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Adverse Event000857
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Bariatric Surgery000101
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Covid-19 Non-AE Related Issues000001
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Increase CR from Baseline000010
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Lost to Follow-up000020
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Medical reasons by Sponsor000001
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Physician Decision000100
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Progressive Disease000120
Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months)Withdrawal by Subject000535

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDB: PlaceboDB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgTotal
Age, Continuous59.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.99
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67
59.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
44 Participants52 Participants55 Participants151 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
246 Participants217 Participants233 Participants696 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
23 Participants27 Participants22 Participants72 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants5 Participants5 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants6 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
25 Participants25 Participants21 Participants71 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
272 Participants254 Participants272 Participants798 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
212 Participants184 Participants209 Participants605 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants112 Participants101 Participants314 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 3123 / 2953 / 3091 / 2310 / 2211 / 207
other
Total, other adverse events
290 / 312276 / 295291 / 309199 / 231213 / 221197 / 207
serious
Total, serious adverse events
43 / 31249 / 29546 / 30926 / 23150 / 22148 / 207

Outcome results

Primary

DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Fibrosis stage was evaluated by NASH Clinical Research Network(CRN)Fibrosis Staging System with stages:0=no fibrosis;1=perisinusoidal/periportal;1A=mild,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1B=moderate,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1C=portal/periportal;2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal;3=bridging fibrosis;4=cirrhosis.No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) categories.NAS is semiquantitative scoring system based on unweighted sum of:steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%),lobular inflammation(0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x),hepatocellular ballooning(0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning)scores.Total scale range:0-12;0:no features of fatty liver disease and 12:highest degree of fatty liver disease.Higher scores:worse symptoms.Responders:did not discontinue treatment due to Adverse event(AE) or did not die and had evaluable post-Baseline biopsy assessment

Time frame: Up to 18 months

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboDB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)31 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)33 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgDB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)37 Participants
p-value: 0.617295% CI: [0.71, 1.79]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.418495% CI: [0.77, 1.89]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)

Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled transient elastography (TE) method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the investigational product (IP). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)-2.10 Kilopascal (kPa)
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)-2.90 Kilopascal (kPa)
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)-3.45 Kilopascal (kPa)
Primary

OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline

ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP). Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline10.46 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.933
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline10.50 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline10.48 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.821
Primary

OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline

FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[Units per Liter {U/L}\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline2.179 RatioStandard Deviation 1.0342
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline2.267 RatioStandard Deviation 0.9567
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline2.266 RatioStandard Deviation 1.0867
Primary

OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality

All-cause mortality is defined as death due to any cause. Number of participants reporting all-cause mortality is presented

Time frame: Up to Month 12

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality1 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality0 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality1 Participants
Primary

OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death

Adjudication was performed under the review of Hepatic Safety Adjudication Committee (HSAC) of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for the following is presented: Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention), Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-liver related death.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathNon-liver related death1 Participants
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathHCC3 Participants
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathAscites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention)1 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathHCC1 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathAscites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention)0 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathNon-liver related death0 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathAscites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention)2 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathNon-liver related death1 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related DeathHCC1 Participants
Primary

OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15

MELD was a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease and to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. It uses the participant's values for total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time to predict survival. MELD score ranges from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) with scores and mortality probability being: Score 40=71.3% mortality; Scores 30-39=52.6% mortality; Scores 20-29=19.6% mortality; Scores10-19=6.0% mortality; Score 9 or less=1.9% mortality. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for MELD score ≥15 is presented.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥150 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥150 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥151 Participants
Primary

OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score

The Child-Pugh classification was a scoring system used for the classification of the severity of cirrhosis. It included three continuous variables (bilirubin, albumin, and international normalized ratio) and two discrete variables (ascites and encephalopathy). Each variable was scored 1-3 with 3 indicating most severe derangement. The determination of Child-Pugh score ranged from 5 to 15. The higher the score, the sicker the participant. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for worsening of Child-Pugh score is presented.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score0 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score1 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score2 Participants
Primary

OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population: included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product (OCA or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs26 Participants
DB: PlaceboOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs199 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs50 Participants
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs213 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs197 Participants
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgOLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs48 Participants
Secondary

DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM

Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled TE method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. The principal comparison was at Month 18. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Month 18

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboDB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM-0.50 Kilopascal (kPa)
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM-3.10 Kilopascal (kPa)
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgDB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM-2.90 Kilopascal (kPa)
Secondary

DB Phase: ELF at Baseline

ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised HA, TIMP1 and PIIINP. Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboDB Phase: ELF at Baseline10.50 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.921
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)DB Phase: ELF at Baseline10.60 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgDB Phase: ELF at Baseline10.61 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.867
Secondary

DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline

FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, ALT and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, AST and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboDB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline2.279 RatioStandard Deviation 1.1091
DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg)DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline2.475 RatioStandard Deviation 1.9307
DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mgDB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline2.405 RatioStandard Deviation 1.163

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026