Compensated Cirrhosis, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Conditions
Keywords
Compensated Cirrhosis, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Fatty Liver Disease, NASH
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether obeticholic acid (OCA; INT-747) can lead to histological improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH in adults with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH.
Interventions
Tablets administered orally once daily.
Tablets administered orally once daily.
Tablets administered orally once daily.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key inclusion criteria: 1\. Subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of NASH and a fibrosis score of 4 based upon the NASH CRN scoring system determined by central reading Key
Exclusion criteria
1. Current or past history of a clinically evident hepatic decompensation event, such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), or variceal bleeding 2. Current or past history of CP score ≥7 points 3. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score \> 12 4. ALT ≥ 5 X ULN 5. Calculated creatinine clearance \<60mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault method 6. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 9.5 % 7. Evidence of other known forms of chronic liver disease such as alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, PBC, PSC, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson disease, iron overload, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, drug-induced liver injury, known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 8. History of liver transplant, or current placement on a liver transplant list
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15 | Up to 12 months | MELD was a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease and to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. It uses the participant's values for total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time to predict survival. MELD score ranges from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) with scores and mortality probability being: Score 40=71.3% mortality; Scores 30-39=52.6% mortality; Scores 20-29=19.6% mortality; Scores10-19=6.0% mortality; Score 9 or less=1.9% mortality. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for MELD score ≥15 is presented. |
| OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality | Up to Month 12 | All-cause mortality is defined as death due to any cause. Number of participants reporting all-cause mortality is presented |
| OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Up to 12 months | Adjudication was performed under the review of Hepatic Safety Adjudication Committee (HSAC) of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for the following is presented: Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention), Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-liver related death. |
| OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score | Up to 12 months | The Child-Pugh classification was a scoring system used for the classification of the severity of cirrhosis. It included three continuous variables (bilirubin, albumin, and international normalized ratio) and two discrete variables (ascites and encephalopathy). Each variable was scored 1-3 with 3 indicating most severe derangement. The determination of Child-Pugh score ranged from 5 to 15. The higher the score, the sicker the participant. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for worsening of Child-Pugh score is presented. |
| DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) | Up to 18 months | Fibrosis stage was evaluated by NASH Clinical Research Network(CRN)Fibrosis Staging System with stages:0=no fibrosis;1=perisinusoidal/periportal;1A=mild,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1B=moderate,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1C=portal/periportal;2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal;3=bridging fibrosis;4=cirrhosis.No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) categories.NAS is semiquantitative scoring system based on unweighted sum of:steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%),lobular inflammation(0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x),hepatocellular ballooning(0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning)scores.Total scale range:0-12;0:no features of fatty liver disease and 12:highest degree of fatty liver disease.Higher scores:worse symptoms.Responders:did not discontinue treatment due to Adverse event(AE) or did not die and had evaluable post-Baseline biopsy assessment |
| OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Up to 12 months | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment. |
| OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) | Baseline and up to Month 12 | Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled transient elastography (TE) method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the investigational product (IP). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. |
| OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[Units per Liter {U/L}\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. |
| OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP). Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, ALT and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, AST and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. |
| DB Phase: ELF at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised HA, TIMP1 and PIIINP. Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. |
| DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM | Baseline and up to Month 18 | Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled TE method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. The principal comparison was at Month 18. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. |
Countries
Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at a total of around 286 centers.
Pre-assignment details
This was a Phase 3, double-Blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Obeticholic Acid (OCA) in participants with compensated cirrhosis due to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). The study comprised of a double-blind (DB) phase (18 months) followed by Open-label extension (OLE) phase (12 months).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DB: Placebo Participants were randomized to receive placebo once daily orally with water, in conjunction with local standard of care. | 313 |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) Participants were randomized to receive OCA 10 mg once daily dosing orally with water, in conjunction with local standard of care. | 296 |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg Participants were randomized to receive OCA 10 mg for the first 3 months prior to uptitrating to OCA 25 mg at Month 3, once daily dosing orally with water, in conjunction with local standard of care. Uptitration was determined based on the laboratory criteria and safety and tolerability assessments completed prior to Month 3. If uptitration at Month 3 was feasible, the window for uptitration was extended by up to one calendar month, after consultation and agreement with the Medical Monitor. | 310 |
| Total | 919 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Adverse Event | 11 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Covid-19 Non Adverse Event (AE) Related Issues | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Death | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Drug Holiday | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Non-Compliance With Study Drug | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Participant moved to Kansas | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Progressive Disease | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Site closure | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Site cover and participant was not willing to be transferred | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Spouse underwent surgery and participant was unable to take IP regularly | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Stopped Investigational product (IP) due to an AE in Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Phase (18 Months) | Withdrawal by Subject | 12 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Bariatric Surgery | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Covid-19 Non-AE Related Issues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Increase CR from Baseline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Medical reasons by Sponsor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Progressive Disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Open Label Extension Phase (12 Months) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | DB: Placebo | DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.99 | 60.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 60.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67 | 59.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.78 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 44 Participants | 52 Participants | 55 Participants | 151 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 246 Participants | 217 Participants | 233 Participants | 696 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 23 Participants | 27 Participants | 22 Participants | 72 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 8 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 25 Participants | 25 Participants | 21 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 272 Participants | 254 Participants | 272 Participants | 798 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 212 Participants | 184 Participants | 209 Participants | 605 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 101 Participants | 112 Participants | 101 Participants | 314 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 312 | 3 / 295 | 3 / 309 | 1 / 231 | 0 / 221 | 1 / 207 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 290 / 312 | 276 / 295 | 291 / 309 | 199 / 231 | 213 / 221 | 197 / 207 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 43 / 312 | 49 / 295 | 46 / 309 | 26 / 231 | 50 / 221 | 48 / 207 |
Outcome results
DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
Fibrosis stage was evaluated by NASH Clinical Research Network(CRN)Fibrosis Staging System with stages:0=no fibrosis;1=perisinusoidal/periportal;1A=mild,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1B=moderate,zone 3,perisinusoidal;1C=portal/periportal;2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal;3=bridging fibrosis;4=cirrhosis.No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) categories.NAS is semiquantitative scoring system based on unweighted sum of:steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%),lobular inflammation(0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x),hepatocellular ballooning(0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning)scores.Total scale range:0-12;0:no features of fatty liver disease and 12:highest degree of fatty liver disease.Higher scores:worse symptoms.Responders:did not discontinue treatment due to Adverse event(AE) or did not die and had evaluable post-Baseline biopsy assessment
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Population: ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) | 31 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) | 33 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | DB Phase: Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Showed Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Without Worsening of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) | 37 Participants |
OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)
Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled transient elastography (TE) method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the investigational product (IP). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time frame: Baseline and up to Month 12
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) | -2.10 Kilopascal (kPa) |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) | -2.90 Kilopascal (kPa) |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) | -3.45 Kilopascal (kPa) |
OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline
ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP). Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline | 10.46 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.933 |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline | 10.50 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) at Baseline | 10.48 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.821 |
OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline
FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[Units per Liter {U/L}\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline | 2.179 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.0342 |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline | 2.267 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.9567 |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Baseline | 2.266 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.0867 |
OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality
All-cause mortality is defined as death due to any cause. Number of participants reporting all-cause mortality is presented
Time frame: Up to Month 12
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality | 1 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality | 0 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants Reporting All-cause Mortality | 1 Participants |
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death
Adjudication was performed under the review of Hepatic Safety Adjudication Committee (HSAC) of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for the following is presented: Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention), Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-liver related death.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Non-liver related death | 1 Participants |
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | HCC | 3 Participants |
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention) | 1 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | HCC | 1 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention) | 0 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Non-liver related death | 0 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Ascites (secondary to cirrhosis and requiring medical intervention) | 2 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | Non-liver related death | 1 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Ascites, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Non-liver Related Death | HCC | 1 Participants |
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15
MELD was a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease and to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. It uses the participant's values for total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time to predict survival. MELD score ranges from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) with scores and mortality probability being: Score 40=71.3% mortality; Scores 30-39=52.6% mortality; Scores 20-29=19.6% mortality; Scores10-19=6.0% mortality; Score 9 or less=1.9% mortality. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for MELD score ≥15 is presented.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15 | 0 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15 | 0 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15 | 1 Participants |
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score
The Child-Pugh classification was a scoring system used for the classification of the severity of cirrhosis. It included three continuous variables (bilirubin, albumin, and international normalized ratio) and two discrete variables (ascites and encephalopathy). Each variable was scored 1-3 with 3 indicating most severe derangement. The determination of Child-Pugh score ranged from 5 to 15. The higher the score, the sicker the participant. Adjudication was performed under the review of HSAC of all available data for each identified participant to determine liver injury status. Number of participants with adjudicated liver related clinical outcomes for worsening of Child-Pugh score is presented.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score | 0 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score | 1 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Adjudicated Liver Related Clinical Outcomes: Worsening of Child-Pugh Score | 2 Participants |
OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Population: Safety Population: included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product (OCA or placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 26 Participants |
| DB: Placebo | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 199 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 50 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 213 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 197 Participants |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | OLE Phase: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 48 Participants |
DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM
Non-invasive radiological methods to assess liver stiffness were conducted at selected study sites where the respective devices were available. These assessments were taken by vibration controlled TE method using FibroScan®. Participant was included as a random effect and an unstructured covariance matrix was used assuming convergence could be attained. The principal comparison was at Month 18. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time frame: Baseline and up to Month 18
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM | -0.50 Kilopascal (kPa) |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM | -3.10 Kilopascal (kPa) |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | DB Phase: Change From Baseline to Month 18 in LSM | -2.90 Kilopascal (kPa) |
DB Phase: ELF at Baseline
ELF was non-invasive panel of circulating fibrosis markers calculated from serum biomarkers. The markers of fibrosis comprised HA, TIMP1 and PIIINP. Each of these markers was measured by an immunoassay and an ELF score was generated, from which a level of fibrosis severity could be determined. The ELF test was a composite score: \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.; higher ELF scores were associated with worsening liver fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | DB Phase: ELF at Baseline | 10.50 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.921 |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | DB Phase: ELF at Baseline | 10.60 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | DB Phase: ELF at Baseline | 10.61 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.867 |
DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline
FIB-4 was a noninvasive assessment of liver disease assessed by a combination of age, ALT and platelet results. FIB-4 was the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It was a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, ALT, AST and age that was calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \<1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Higher ratio indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as the last value collected prior to the first administration of the IP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB: Placebo | DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline | 2.279 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.1091 |
| DB: OCA 10 Milligrams (mg) | DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline | 2.475 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.9307 |
| DB: OCA 10 mg Titrated to OCA 25 mg | DB Phase: FIB-4 at Baseline | 2.405 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.163 |