Skip to content

Cardiac Shock Wave Treatment in Patients With Reduced Coronary Flow Reserve

The Impact of Cardiac Shock Wave Treatment in Patients With Reduced Coronary Flow Reserve in the Absence of Epicardial Coronary Artery Stenoses: A Pilot Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03438500
Enrollment
0
Registered
2018-02-19
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2022-09-01
Last updated
2022-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease, Refractory Angina Pectoris

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility of Cardiac Shock Wave Treatment in patients with anginal chest pain and evidence of abnormal myocardial perfusion under stress in the absence of significant stenoses of the epicardial coronary arteries.

Detailed description

This is a mono-center, prospective, single arm, pilot study designed to assess the feasibility of the Cardiac Shock Wave Treatment in patients with anginal chest pain and evidence of abnormal myocardial perfusion under stress in the absence of significant stenoses of the epicardial coronary arteries. A total of 10 subjects will be enrolled in the study. All enrolled study subjects will be assessed for clinical follow-up at the following intervals: 5 and 14 weeks post CSWT procedure.

Interventions

DEVICECardiac Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Modulith SLC)

40 - 60 spots per visit (200 shots/spot) at Energy Level 3

Sponsors

Technical University of Munich
CollaboratorOTHER
Storz Medical AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of anginal chest pain that prompted a myocardial stress test (nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging, stress echocardiography, or perfusion CMR) * Evidence for stress-induced myocardial ischemia in this examination * Coronary angiogram showing absence of ≥30% stenosis of epicardial coronary arteries

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in other clinical trials * age \<18 years * Contraindications to under cMRI * Contraindications to adenosine (severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, atrioventricular block (AV block) \> grade 1) * Left ventricular thrombus * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension, * Any other severe chronic illness such as liver or renal failure (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 45 ml/min), active neoplastic disease, history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization within the past three months * Patients with pacemaker or implanted cardioverter defibrillator * Patients after valve surgical replacement * Patients after interventional valve replacement or reconstruction (e.g. transfemoral aortic valve replacement or MitraClip implantation) * Pregnancy (a reliable method of contraception must be used for the entire duration of the study) * Fertile female participants who are capable of bearing children and who do not use a method of contraception that is medically approved by the health authority of the respective country * Missing capacity to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR)14 weeksChange from baseline in MPR (assessed with quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI)) at 14 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diffuse fibrosis5 weeksChange from baseline in diffuse fibrosis (assessed with T1 mapping) at 5 weeks
Enddiastolic volume5 weeksChange from baseline in enddiastolic volume (assessed with cMRI and TTE) at 5 weeks
Endsystolic volume5 weeksChange from baseline in endsystolic volume (assessed with cMRI and TTE) at 5 weeks
Stroke volume5 weeksChange from baseline in stroke volume (assessed with cMRI and TTE) at 5 weeks
Ejection fraction5 weeksChange from baseline in ejection fraction (assessed with cMRI and TTE) at 5 weeks
Regional wall motion5 weeksChange from baseline in regional wall motion (assessed with steady state free precession cMRI) at 5 weeks
Severity and frequency of angina5 weeksChange from baseline in Seattle Angina questionnaire at 5 weeks
New York Heart Association (NYHA) class5 weeksChange from baseline in NYHA class at 5 weeks
Exercise capacity5 weeksChange from baseline in exercise capacity (assessed by the 6-minute walk test) at 5 weeks
Quality of life (SF-36)5 weeksChange from baseline in quality of life (assessed with questionnaire Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey) at 5 weeks
New myocardial scarring or fibrotic changes5 weeksChange from baseline in new myocardial scarring or fibrotic changes (assessed with LGE cMRI) at 5 weeks
Myocardial edema5 weeksChange from baseline in myocardial edema (assessed with cMRI) at 5 weeks
Myocardial hemorrhage5 weeksChange from baseline in myocardial hemorrhage (assessed with cMRI) at 5 weeks
Scar extent5 weeksChange from baseline in scar extent (assessed with late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE cMRI)) at 5 weeks

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026