Skip to content

Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material in Vital Teeth

Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material on the Retention Rate and Sensitivity for Provisional Direct Restorations in Vital Teeth - Clinical Study Randomized

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03437655
Enrollment
25
Registered
2018-02-19
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
2018-10-30
Last updated
2018-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MTA, Dental Restoration, Temporary

Brief summary

The aim of this study is through a randomized clinical trial, double blind, splithmouth, evaluate the success rate (retation rate and dental sensibility) of temporary direct restorations in vital teeth. The composition of the temporary direct restoration (based on Zinc-Oxide with Eugenol; and mineral trioxide aggregate). Data will be collected, tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis.

Detailed description

The confection of temporary direct restoration is still verry commom in dental clinic routine, either by the time required or by biological requirements.The temporary restorations must have sufficient retention and solubility between the consultation intervals to avoid displacement and infiltration; besides being biocompatible to avoid sensitivity. The aim of this study is through a randomized clinical trial, double blind, splithmouth, evaluate the success rate (retention rate and dental sensibility) of temporary direct restoration on vital teeth. The composition of the temporary material (based on Zinc-Oxide with Eugenol; and based on mineral trioxide aggregate) will be evaluated. Twenty-five participants with at least two vital teeth with the need to confection of direct restoration (each participant) will be selected. The teeth will be randomly divided into 2 different groups according to the temporary material composition (Based on Zinc-Oxide with Eugenol; and based on mineral trioxide aggregate). Data will be collected, tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis.

Interventions

PROCEDURECarie removal

Carie removal with a low speed handpiece

Relative isolation with cotton and gauze.

PROCEDUREManipulation of the temporary material based on Zinc Oxide and Eugenol

Manipulation of the temporary material based on Zinc Oxide and Eugenol according to the manufacturer's recommendations

PROCEDUREManipulation of the temporary material based on Mineral trioxide aggregate

Manipulation of the temporary material based on Mineral trioxide aggregate according to the manufacturer's recommendations

PROCEDUREMaterial insertion on the cavity

Material insertion on the cavity according to the manufacturer's recommendations

PROCEDUREFinishing the temporary direct restoration

Excess cement removal; Occlusal Adjustment; Finishing and polishing.

Sponsors

Federal University of Uberlandia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy volunteers; both genres; presence of at least two teeth with indication of direct restoration; good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

* Dentures or orthodontics; presence of periodontal disease and,or parafunctional habits; systemic disease and, or severe psychological; constant use of analgesic and, or anti-inflammatory or allergic response to dental products.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate (retention rate and absence of sensibility) of temporary direct restoration with diferents temporary materials with a 15 days of follow up15 days

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026