Skip to content

Role of Social Incentives in PRO Collection

Using Social Incentives to Increase Response Rate to Routine Patient Reported Outcome Measurement After Episodic Healthcare Interventions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03436446
Enrollment
8
Registered
2018-02-19
Start date
2018-02-08
Completion date
2018-05-24
Last updated
2019-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthopedic Disorder

Keywords

Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO), Social Incentives

Brief summary

Value-based healthcare is heavily dependent on the accurate measurement of patient outcomes, both immediately after treatment and at long-term intervals. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are often the central component of any quality improvement process as they are patient centered, reflect the ultimate objective of the intervention and are endorsed by many professional societies as the preferred physician performance metric. Although high response rates are critical to producing reliable data to support value-based payment models, quality improvement, and stakeholder transparency - especially in arthroscopy in which patients often fare well over time and may be less likely to continue with follow-up - response rates to outcome surveys after initial recovery from treatment are consistently below 50%. Monetary incentives offer only minor improvements in response rates against large increases in already rising costs. Individually tailored social incentives - as grounded in current behavioral economic practice - offer a potential cost-effective solution to this problem in Sports Medicine and arthroscopy. The investigators predict that well-constructed, personal social incentives will increase response rates for long-term follow-up of episodic care compared to control. The investigators predict these rates will vary depending on the patient demographics and other characteristics.

Interventions

OTHERInterview

Interviews will be conducted with orthopedic patients to review the construction and phrasing of various social incentives aimed at promoting patient reported outcome collection amongst post-operative patients.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking * Orthopedic patient * 6-24 months post-operative

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interview feedbackEnd of discussion with patient, 15 minutesThe investigators will use feedback from the interviews to adjust the social incentives.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026