Skip to content

Intraperitoneal Administration of Fosfomycin, Metronidazole and Molgramostim Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis

Intraperitoneal Administration of Fosfomycin, Metronidazole and Molgramostim Versus Intravenous Conventional Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis - a Pivotal Quasi-randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03435900
Enrollment
13
Registered
2018-02-19
Start date
2018-02-14
Completion date
2018-07-17
Last updated
2018-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis Perforated

Brief summary

The objective of this trial is to evaluate if intraoperative intraperitoneal administration of fosfomycin, metronidazole and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) followed by oral antibiotic for three days is as effective as the current intravenous antibiotic treatment given during and three days after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. The primary outcome is the total length of hospital stay, defined as the number of hours in hospital after end of operation and until 30-day follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGCombination of fosfomycin, metronidazole and rhGM-CSF (administered together intraperitoneally) and three days of antibiotics p.o.

All drugs will be administered together intraperitoneally at the end of the surgery after the appendix has been removed. Hereafter, the intervention group will receive three days of orally administered antibiotics: 500 mg amoxicillin combined with 125 mg clavulanic acid and 500 mg metronidazole. These doses will be administered three times daily.

DRUGStandard antibiotics intravenously

4 g piperacillin/500 mg tazobactam and 1 g metronidazole administered intravenously during surgery followed by 4 g piperacillin/500 mg tazobactam and 500 mg metronidazole administered intravenously three times daily for three days.

Sponsors

Bispebjerg Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Herlev Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Quasi-randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Suspicion of acute appendicitis and planned for diagnostic laparoscopy and eventual laparoscopic appendectomy * Perforated appendicitis (diagnosed during surgery by the surgeon) * Negative p-HCG (women) * Written informed consent after written and verbal information (preoperatively for the intervention group and postoperatively for the control group)

Exclusion criteria

* Cannot understand, read or speak Danish * Previous allergic reaction to fosfomycin, metronidazole, rhGM-CSF, or penicillins e.g. piperacillin or amoxicillin * Diagnostic laparoscopy revealing normal appendix not requiring an appendectomy or appendicitis without perforation * Other intra-abdominal pathology requiring surgical intervention at the same operation * Known renal or hepatic disease or biochemical evidence at the time of admission * Known hematologic disease in current medical treatment * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≥4 (a patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life) * Body weight \>110 kg * Surgery converted to open appendectomy * Anticipated compliance problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total length of hospital stayFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upin hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side effectsWithin 24 hours after surgery and 10 days (±2 days) postoperativelyNumber and description. A questionnaire regarding side effects is collected within the first 24 hours after surgery and at 10 days postoperatively (±2 days)
Postoperative complicationsFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upNumber. According to the Clavien-Dindo grading
Surgical site infections requiring surgical drainageFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upIt is defined as deep incisional surgical site infection according to Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Intraabdominal abscesses requiring drainageFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upNumber. It is defined as an organ/space surgical site infection according to CDC
ReadmissionsFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upNumber. Only readmissions related to the surgery will be registered; e.g. admission and treatment of a non-related condition will not be registered.
Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)10 days (±2 days) and 30 days (±3 days) postoperativelyA disease-specific questionnaire validated in Danish is collected at 10 days postoperatively (±2 days) and at 30 days postoperatively (±3 days)
Time to return to normal activitiesFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upTime period in days. The date is defined at the time point at which the participant could return to normal daily activities.
Period of sick leave absence from workFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upTime periode in days. The parameter is defined as the number of days from the operation to the time point at where the participant returned to work or school.
CostsFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upThe estimated total costs of admission, surgery, possible complications, reoperations etc. in the two treatment groups.
Adverse eventsFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-up
Microbiological flora and susceptibilityFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upNumber and type of positive specimens. If participants have a postoperative infectious complication.
ReoperationsFrom end of surgery until 30-days follow-upNumber. Only reoperations related to the appendectomy will be registered.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026