Hypoxemia
Conditions
Brief summary
* Question: Ventilatory strategy to counterbalance the effect of one lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. * Findings: the open lung approach improved oxygenation and lung compliance, reducing respiratory system driving pressure and transpulmonary driving pressure. * Meaning: patients undergoing thoracic surgery during one lung ventilation may benefit of an open lung approach strategy to avoid ventilator lung injury.
Detailed description
Background: During thoracic surgery in lateral decubitus, one lung ventilation (OLV) may impair respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. The investigators tested a strategy based on an open lung approach (OLA) consisting in lung recruitment immediately followed by a decremental positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to the best respiratory system compliance (CRS) and separately quantified the elastic properties of the lung and the chest wall. The investigators hypothesis was that this approach would improve gas exchange and increase lung compliance (CL). Methods: In thirteen patients undergoing upper left lobectomy the investigators studied lung and chest wall mechanics, transpulmonary pressure (PL), respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPRS and ΔPL), gas exchange and hemodynamics at two time-points (a) during OLV at zero end-expiratory pressure (OLVpre-OLA) and (b) after the application of the open-lung strategy (OLVpost-OLA).
Interventions
PROCEDURERecruitment maneuver
the ventilator was switched to pressure-control ventilation with a driving pressure of 20 cmH2O. After a 3 min equilibration, PEEP was applied in steps of 5,10,15 and 20 cmH2O every five respiratory breaths; subsequently, after setting a driving pressure of 15 cmH2O, PEEP was stepwise reduced, starting from 15 cmH2O, by 2 cmH2O every 2 minutes. The recruiting pressure of 20/20 was applied for six breaths. During the decremental PEEP trial, CRS was measured at every step. The PEEP level corresponding to highest CRS during the decremental trial was identified as the best PEEP. Subsequently, the lungs were recruited again and the best PEEP was applied.
Sponsors
University of Foggia
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* age \> 18 years, * surgery and OLV lasting ≥ 60 min
Exclusion criteria
* lung reduction surgery, pneumonectomy, patients with severe COPD with preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio, expressed as a percentage (FEV1/FVC%) \<60%, presence of large bullae, pleural diseases and/or acute or chronic uncompensated cardiac disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in respiratory mechanics before and after the open lung approach | During surgery | Respiratory mechanics parameters were recorded, digitized and collected on a personal computer through a 12-bit analog-to digital converter board (DAQCard 700; National Instrument, Austin, TX) at a sample rate of 200 Hz (ICU Lab, KleisTEK Engineering, Bari, Italy). |
Outcome results
None listed