Skip to content

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bifidobacterium BB-12® in the Treatment of Infantile Colic

Studio Clinico Randomizzato Per Valutare l'Efficacia Del Bifidobacterium BB-12® Nel Trattamento Delle Coliche Infantili

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03434249
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-02-15
Start date
2016-11-11
Completion date
2017-11-06
Last updated
2020-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colic, Infantile, Infantile Colic

Keywords

Bifidobacterium

Brief summary

This is a single-center, randomized, double blind controlled study to investigate the effects of Bifidobacterium, BB-12® versus placebo in a study group of pediatric patients with infantile colic.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBifidobacterium, BB-12® (Bifidolactis Infant)
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBifidolactis Infant Placebo

Sponsors

SOFAR S.p.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a prospective randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 7 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients are included in the study if they meet all the following criteria: * Exclusively breastfed healthy infants of both sexes, aged ≤ 7 weeks. * Diagnosis of IC according to Rome III criteria. * Written informed consent of the parent/tutor.

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded from this study if they meet any of the following criteria: * Birth weight \< 2500 g. * Gestational age \< 37 weeks. * APGAR 5 minutes \< 7. * Formula feeding. * Stunting/loss of weight (\< 100 g/weeks from birth to the last reported weight). * Neurological diseases. * Known or suspected food allergy. * Gastroesophageal reflux disease. * Use of substances that alter gut microbiota (probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotics, gastric acidity inhibitors) in the last 2 weeks prior the enrollment. * History of fever and/or infectious diseases in the last 2 weeks prior to enrollment. * Ongoing systemic infections. * History of congenital infections. * Chronic intestinal diseases (cystic fibrosis or other forms of primitive pancreatic insufficiency) * Primitive or secondary malformations of the gastrointestinal tract (such as esophageal atresia, intestinal atresia, short bowel syndrome, malrotation). * Metabolic diseases. * Genetic diseases and chromosomal abnormalities. * Primary or secondary immunodeficiencies. * Not sufficient reliability or presence of conditions that may result in non-compliance/adherence of the patient to the Protocol. * Previous participation in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying Durationat 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Treatment success rate was evaluated in terms of reduction of crying duration, comparing mean weekly duration of the last Week (from T4 to T5) and mean weekly duration of Week 1 (from T0 to T1). The daily number and duration of crying episodes has been collected in the 'Evaluation of crying' section of the patient diary. Weekly mean is defined as the mean of the calculated average daily durations during the selected week and is described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data. Mean changes from baseline (i.e. mean of the first Week) to the mean of the selected week will be computed as well. The following categories of patients has been defined: Success = patients who meet the criteria for the treatment success rate No Success = patients who do not meet the criteria for the treatment success rate Missing = patients who did not do the last visit (Visit T5 - at 28 days from baseline)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Crying Episodesat 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Weekly mean of cries will be defined as the mean number of cries reported in the Evaluation of behavior section during the week (i.e. number of episodes/number of days with episodes) and will be described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data. Mean changes from baseline (i.e. mean of the first Week) to the mean of the selected week will be analyzed too.
Infectious Diseases Incidenceat each visit, for 5 weeks starting from the enrollment in the study (Visit T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)Number of infections in respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, urinary tract and skin. An infection was defined as an Adverse Event with SOC equal to Infections and Infestations.
Bowel Evacuation - Stool Frequencyat each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)Daily frequency of bowel evacuation. The frequency of stools were collected daily in the diary. Stool frequency was evaluated as the mean of total daily stools reported per week.
Bowel Evacuation - Stool Consistencyat each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)Stool consistency was evaluated as the number and the proportion of patients who reported at least one stool sample of each type per week, according to Bristol scale as follows: Type A = separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type B = sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type C = Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type D = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Only a descriptive statistics Type E = soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily) Type F = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type G = watery, no solid pieces (entirely liquid). Patients could report more than one stool consistency per day then the sum of the Count of Participants for each group at each visit could be Greater then the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed
Infant's Moodat each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)The infant's mood (calm, asleep, agitated, irritable) was collected daily in the diary and was evaluated as the number and the proportion of infants who reported at least one mood of each type per week. Patients could report more than one mood per day then the sum of the Count of Participants for each group at each visit could be greater then the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed.
Infant's Sleepat each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)Duration of sleep (in minutes) was collected daily in the diary during the entire study period. Mean daily duration of sleep by week was defined as the mean of the daily durations during the selected week and was described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data.
Infant's Temperat each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)Duration of temper episodes (in minutes) was collected daily in the diary during the entire study period. Mean daily duration of temper episodes by week was defined as the mean of the daily durations during the selected week and was described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data.
Infant's Feedingat each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)Duration of feeding (in minutes) was collected daily in the diary during the entire study period. Mean daily feeding time by week was defined as the mean of the daily durations during the selected week and was described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data.
Calprotectinat 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Evaluation of calprotectin levels in fecal samples
Beta-defensin Type 2at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Evaluation of Beta-defensin type 2 levels in fecal samples
LL37 Peptideat 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Evaluation of LL37 peptide levels in fecal samples
Short Chain Fatty Acids - Butyrateat 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Evaluation of Butyrate levels in fecal samples
Secretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) levels in fecal samples

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study. Eighty (80) infants were screened and all were enrolled in the study and randomized (40 to Bifidobacteriium BB-12® and 40 to Placebo). The enrollment period started on 11-Nov-2016 and closed on 6-Nov-2017.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bifidobacterium BB-12®
patients who take Bifidobacterium BB-12® (Bifidolactis Infant), 6 drops a day (guaranteeing a billion of living cells) for 28 consecutive days; Bifidobacterium, BB-12® (Bifidolactis Infant)
40
Placebo
patients who take Bifidolactis Infant Placebo 6 drops a day for 28 consecutive days. Bifidolactis Infant Placebo
40
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDifficulties in completing daily diary21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyNon-compliance of family21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBifidobacterium BB-12®Total
Age, Continuous32.73 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.69
33.05 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.03
32.89 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.34
Apgar 5 minutes score8.83 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.38
8.95 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.39
8.89 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.39
Birth weight3412.00 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 442.75
3280.75 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 367.54
3346.38 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 409.66
Clinical/surgical history
No prior clinical/surgical events were reported
40 Participants40 Participants80 Participants
Clinical/surgical history
Prior clinical/surgical events were reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke within the home environment
No
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke within the home environment
Yes
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Gestational age38.53 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
38.43 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
38.48 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
Positive family history of allergic disease
No
22 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Positive family history of allergic disease
Yes
18 Participants19 Participants37 Participants
Positive family history of functional gastrointestinal diseases
No
33 Participants37 Participants70 Participants
Positive family history of functional gastrointestinal diseases
Yes
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
40 participants40 participants80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants18 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants22 Participants43 Participants
Smoking habits
Father
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Smoking habits
Mother
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Smoking habits
Mother, Father
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Smoking habits
No one
29 Participants26 Participants55 Participants
Type of childbirth
Caesarean section
19 Participants25 Participants44 Participants
Type of childbirth
Natural childbirth
21 Participants15 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying Duration

Treatment success rate was evaluated in terms of reduction of crying duration, comparing mean weekly duration of the last Week (from T4 to T5) and mean weekly duration of Week 1 (from T0 to T1). The daily number and duration of crying episodes has been collected in the 'Evaluation of crying' section of the patient diary. Weekly mean is defined as the mean of the calculated average daily durations during the selected week and is described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data. Mean changes from baseline (i.e. mean of the first Week) to the mean of the selected week will be computed as well. The following categories of patients has been defined: Success = patients who meet the criteria for the treatment success rate No Success = patients who do not meet the criteria for the treatment success rate Missing = patients who did not do the last visit (Visit T5 - at 28 days from baseline)

Time frame: at 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Following the intent-to-treat (ITT) principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization visit.~Patients drop-out were also considered and classified as Treatment success rate = Missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Number of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying DurationVisit T5 - No Success3 Participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Number of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying DurationVisit T5 - Missing5 Participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Number of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying DurationVisit T5 - Success32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying DurationVisit T5 - No Success24 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying DurationVisit T5 - Missing3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Mean Weekly Crying DurationVisit T5 - Success13 Participants
Comparison: According to the results of a previous trial that looked at a probiotic's effect on infants with CI, it was estimated that when the sample size in each group is 33, the study has 80% power to detect an absolute difference of 35% in the treatment success rate (15% in the Placebo group and 50% in the treatment group) with a 0,05 alpha level.~The number of infants that was included in the study was 80, with an expected maximum dropout rate of 20%.p-value: 0.0001Chi-squared
Secondary

Beta-defensin Type 2

Evaluation of Beta-defensin type 2 levels in fecal samples

Time frame: at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: The analysis Population includes all participants for wich an evaluable fecal sample was available at Visit T1 and Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Beta-defensin Type 2Visit T1 - baseline73.50 ng/gStandard Deviation 10.92
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Beta-defensin Type 2Visit T5166.34 ng/gStandard Deviation 43.79
PlaceboBeta-defensin Type 2Visit T1 - baseline69.41 ng/gStandard Deviation 7.03
PlaceboBeta-defensin Type 2Visit T5127.97 ng/gStandard Deviation 35.41
Secondary

Bowel Evacuation - Stool Consistency

Stool consistency was evaluated as the number and the proportion of patients who reported at least one stool sample of each type per week, according to Bristol scale as follows: Type A = separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type B = sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type C = Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type D = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Only a descriptive statistics Type E = soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily) Type F = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type G = watery, no solid pieces (entirely liquid). Patients could report more than one stool consistency per day then the sum of the Count of Participants for each group at each visit could be Greater then the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed

Time frame: at each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.~The number of participants analyzed in Visit T5 is less then Visit T1 since 8 participants dropped from the study before Visit T5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type E21 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type E24 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type E25 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type F27 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type G12 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type G8 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type F30 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type D14 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type D18 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type G12 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type E27 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type F23 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type G8 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type F27 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least 1 stool of type C0 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type D17 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type D16 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type E26 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type D14 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type F19 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type G6 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least 1 stool of type C1 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type D10 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type E15 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type F34 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT1: Patients with at least one stool of type G21 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type C1 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type D8 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type E19 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type F34 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT2: Patients with at least one stool of type G20 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type G3 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type D8 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type E26 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type F30 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT3: Patients with at least one stool of type G8 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type C0 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type D15 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type E30 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type F27 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT4: Patients with at least one stool of type G5 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type D25 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type E29 participants
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool ConsistencyT5: Patients with at least one stool of type F16 participants
Secondary

Bowel Evacuation - Stool Frequency

Daily frequency of bowel evacuation. The frequency of stools were collected daily in the diary. Stool frequency was evaluated as the mean of total daily stools reported per week.

Time frame: at each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.~The number of participants analyzed in Visit T5 is less then Visit T1 since 8 participants dropped from the study before Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T54.34 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.45
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisti T1 - Baseline5.30 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.49
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T25.15 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.63
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T34.92 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.53
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Bowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T44.51 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.51
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T45.10 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.24
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T35.35 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.45
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisti T1 - Baseline5.61 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T54.64 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.23
PlaceboBowel Evacuation - Stool FrequencyVisit T25.50 daily number of bowel evacuationsStandard Deviation 1.54
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Calprotectin

Evaluation of calprotectin levels in fecal samples

Time frame: at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: The analysis Population includes all participants for wich an evaluable fecal sample was available at Visit T1 and Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®CalprotectinVisit T1 - Baseline667.76 mM/KgStandard Deviation 162.06
Bifidobacterium BB-12®CalprotectinVisit T5802.64 mM/KgStandard Deviation 131.33
PlaceboCalprotectinVisit T1 - Baseline658.47 mM/KgStandard Deviation 112.61
PlaceboCalprotectinVisit T5915.41 mM/KgStandard Deviation 106.47
Secondary

Infant's Feeding

Duration of feeding (in minutes) was collected daily in the diary during the entire study period. Mean daily feeding time by week was defined as the mean of the daily durations during the selected week and was described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data.

Time frame: at each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's FeedingVisit T2186.13 minutesStandard Deviation 63.37
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's FeedingVisit T4180.31 minutesStandard Deviation 47.85
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's FeedingVisit T3179.80 minutesStandard Deviation 55.16
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's FeedingVisit T5176.47 minutesStandard Deviation 38.55
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's FeedingVisit T1 - Baseline187.72 minutesStandard Deviation 35.95
PlaceboInfant's FeedingVisit T5182.26 minutesStandard Deviation 27.2
PlaceboInfant's FeedingVisit T1 - Baseline177.72 minutesStandard Deviation 34.66
PlaceboInfant's FeedingVisit T2188.98 minutesStandard Deviation 32.75
PlaceboInfant's FeedingVisit T3185.98 minutesStandard Deviation 30.98
PlaceboInfant's FeedingVisit T4182.22 minutesStandard Deviation 28.7
Secondary

Infant's Mood

The infant's mood (calm, asleep, agitated, irritable) was collected daily in the diary and was evaluated as the number and the proportion of infants who reported at least one mood of each type per week. Patients could report more than one mood per day then the sum of the Count of Participants for each group at each visit could be greater then the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed.

Time frame: at each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The number of participants analyzed in Visit T5 is less then Visit T1 since 8 participants dropped from the study before Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT1: Pts with at least one mood equal to Calm4 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT1: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep5 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT1: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated38 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT1: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable36 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm14 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep11 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated37 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable33 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm28 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep12 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated34 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable25 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm35 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep21 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated32 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable11 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm35 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep27 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated9 participants
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable5 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep23 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT1: Pts with at least one mood equal to Calm5 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated33 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT1: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep6 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable28 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT1: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated25 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable30 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT1: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable36 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable20 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm7 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm15 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep8 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm17 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated32 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep17 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT2: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Irritable34 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT5: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated34 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Calm12 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT4: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Agitated36 participants
PlaceboInfant's MoodT3: Pts. with at least one mood equal to Asleep8 participants
Secondary

Infant's Sleep

Duration of sleep (in minutes) was collected daily in the diary during the entire study period. Mean daily duration of sleep by week was defined as the mean of the daily durations during the selected week and was described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data.

Time frame: at each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The number of participants analyzed in Visit T5 is less then Visit T1 since 8 participants dropped from the study before Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's SleepVisit T2687.47 minutesStandard Deviation 113.41
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's SleepVisit T4725.76 minutesStandard Deviation 112.54
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's SleepVisit T3722.37 minutesStandard Deviation 116.3
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's SleepVisit T5713.20 minutesStandard Deviation 98.97
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's SleepVisit T1 - baseline678.14 minutesStandard Deviation 96.13
PlaceboInfant's SleepVisit T5738.61 minutesStandard Deviation 141.58
PlaceboInfant's SleepVisit T1 - baseline693.62 minutesStandard Deviation 121.79
PlaceboInfant's SleepVisit T2696.68 minutesStandard Deviation 121
PlaceboInfant's SleepVisit T3711.99 minutesStandard Deviation 128.87
PlaceboInfant's SleepVisit T4725.14 minutesStandard Deviation 131.74
Secondary

Infant's Temper

Duration of temper episodes (in minutes) was collected daily in the diary during the entire study period. Mean daily duration of temper episodes by week was defined as the mean of the daily durations during the selected week and was described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data.

Time frame: at each weekly visit from baseline (Visit T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's TemperVisit T2118.61 minutesStandard Deviation 45.59
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's TemperVisit T471.71 minutesStandard Deviation 54.79
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's TemperVisit T389.48 minutesStandard Deviation 47.96
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's TemperVisit T536.79 minutesStandard Deviation 42.45
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infant's TemperVisit T1 - Baseline158.82 minutesStandard Deviation 36.31
PlaceboInfant's TemperVisit T572.96 minutesStandard Deviation 40.22
PlaceboInfant's TemperVisit T1 - Baseline138 minutesStandard Deviation 34.71
PlaceboInfant's TemperVisit T2117.24 minutesStandard Deviation 58.32
PlaceboInfant's TemperVisit T384.33 minutesStandard Deviation 46.76
PlaceboInfant's TemperVisit T484.89 minutesStandard Deviation 58.04
Secondary

Infectious Diseases Incidence

Number of infections in respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, urinary tract and skin. An infection was defined as an Adverse Event with SOC equal to Infections and Infestations.

Time frame: at each visit, for 5 weeks starting from the enrollment in the study (Visit T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Infectious Diseases Incidence0 Number of infectionsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboInfectious Diseases Incidence0 Number of infectionsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

LL37 Peptide

Evaluation of LL37 peptide levels in fecal samples

Time frame: at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: The analysis Population includes all participants for wich an evaluable fecal sample was available at Visit T1 and Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®LL37 PeptideVisit T57.65 ng/gStandard Deviation 1.15
Bifidobacterium BB-12®LL37 PeptideVisit T1 - Baseline5.50 ng/gStandard Deviation 0.82
PlaceboLL37 PeptideVisit T56.07 ng/gStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboLL37 PeptideVisit T1 - Baseline5.37 ng/gStandard Deviation 0.83
Secondary

Number of Crying Episodes

Weekly mean of cries will be defined as the mean number of cries reported in the Evaluation of behavior section during the week (i.e. number of episodes/number of days with episodes) and will be described by means of descriptive statistics for continuous data. Mean changes from baseline (i.e. mean of the first Week) to the mean of the selected week will be analyzed too.

Time frame: at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: Intention to Treat Set (ITT): all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.~The number of participants analyzed in Visit T5 is less then Visit T1 since 8 participants dropped from the study before Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Number of Crying EpisodesVisit T53.15 number of episodesStandard Deviation 1.48
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Number of Crying EpisodesVisit T1 - Baseline7.92 number of episodesStandard Deviation 2.79
PlaceboNumber of Crying EpisodesVisit T1 - Baseline8.28 number of episodesStandard Deviation 3.12
PlaceboNumber of Crying EpisodesVisit T56.04 number of episodesStandard Deviation 2.42
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Secretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)

Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) levels in fecal samples

Time frame: at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: The analysis Population includes all the participants for wich an evaluable fecal sample was available at Visit T1 and Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Secretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)Visit T1 - Baseline84.79 microg/gStandard Deviation 21.71
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Secretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)Visit T5250.65 microg/gStandard Deviation 37.95
PlaceboSecretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)Visit T1 - Baseline86.55 microg/gStandard Deviation 12.13
PlaceboSecretory Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)Visit T5192.01 microg/gStandard Deviation 27.12
Secondary

Short Chain Fatty Acids - Butyrate

Evaluation of Butyrate levels in fecal samples

Time frame: at 7 days (Visit T1 - baseline) and 28 days from the baseline (Visit T5)

Population: The analysis Population includes all participants for wich an evaluable fecal sample was available at Visit T1 and Visit T5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Short Chain Fatty Acids - ButyrateVisit T1 - Baseline0.19 mM/KgStandard Deviation 0.14
Bifidobacterium BB-12®Short Chain Fatty Acids - ButyrateVisit T50.63 mM/KgStandard Deviation 0.49
PlaceboShort Chain Fatty Acids - ButyrateVisit T1 - Baseline0.17 mM/KgStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboShort Chain Fatty Acids - ButyrateVisit T50.32 mM/KgStandard Deviation 0.33

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026