Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of SFPP in Knee Osteoarthritis

Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SFPP in Knee Osteoarthritis Using Diclofenac Gel as the Comparator

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03434197
Enrollment
313
Registered
2018-02-15
Start date
2018-02-05
Completion date
2021-01-11
Last updated
2021-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis Knee Pain

Keywords

Osteoarthritis Knee Pain

Brief summary

The objectives of this study are to demonstrate the non-inferiority of esflurbiprofen plaster (SFPP) 40 mg applied for 2 weeks to diclofenac gel, the comparator, in terms of efficacy in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to examine the safety of SFPP.

Interventions

DRUGEsflurbiprofen

A plaster containing 40 mg of Esflurbiprofen and 36.2 mg of Japanese Pharmacopoeia mentha oil per patch (10 × 14 cm)

DRUGDiclofenac diethylamine

A gel containing 11.6 mg of Diclofenac diethylamine (equivalent to 10 mg of diclofenac sodium) per 1 g (1 tube contains 20 g)

Sponsors

Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who had unilateral knee pain and were classified as Grade II or III according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading and whose non-assessed knee is not graded higher than the assessed knee based on x-ray in standing, weight-bearing extension position within 90 days before screening visit (1st visit) * Patients whose knee pain on rising from the chair assessed by visual analogue scale (rVAS) of the assessed knee meets all the following criteria for the level of pain; \< 80 mm at washout visit (2nd visit), ≥ 40 mm at baseline visit (3rd visit), Worsening of ≥ 15 mm at baseline visit (3rd visit) compared with rVAS at washout visit (2nd visit) as a result of discontinuation of use of NSAIDs

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with complication of rheumatoid arthritis, history of knee surgery, malignant tumor, neuropsychiatric disease, or serious disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of Knee pain on rising from the chair5 weeks (3 weeks of observation period and follow up with 2 weeks treatment period)0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0mm, no pain; 100mm, worst pain ever)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of Investigator's global assessmentLast visitInvestigator's global assessment Questionnaire ( 1=Marked, 2=Moderate, 3=Mild, 4=No change, 5=Worse)
Improvement of Patient's global assessmentLast visitPatient's global assessment Questionnaire ( 1=Marked, 2=Moderate, 3=Mild, 4=No change, 5=Worse )
Improvement of Changes in total clinical symptom5 weeks (3 weeks of observation period and follow up with 2 weeks treatment period)Assessment from investigator ( 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe; total= 0 - 45 )
Number of Rescue drug use during treatment period3 weeks (1 weeks of observation period and follow up with 2 weeks treatment period)Report from investigator
Number of Adverse events and adverse drug reactions5 weeks (3 weeks of observation period and follow up with 2 weeks treatment period)Report from investigator
Improvement of Knee pain on walking5 weeks (3 weeks of observation period and follow up with 2 weeks treatment period)0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0mm, no pain; 100mm, worst pain ever)

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026