Skip to content

Prevention of Seroma Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection With Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Prevention of Seroma Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection With Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03433937
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-02-15
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2020-09-01
Last updated
2021-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphedema, Quality of Life, Seroma, Surgical Site Infection

Brief summary

Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is indicated following metastatic malignant melanoma, and is associated with a high-complication rate, of which many begin with the formation of seroma and ends in complicated wound healing, reoperation, multiple outpatient visits and re-hospitalization. Prevention of seroma may therefore lead to a reduction of many of the preceding complications and improve patient quality-of-life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and oncological safety of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy following ILND in melanoma patients.

Interventions

DEVICENegative pressure wound therapy

Wound dressing

Wound dressing

Sponsors

Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All malignant melanoma patients who are candidates for ILND and 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suspected of having tumor residuals after ILND, previous groin irradiation or patients suffering from dementia or any psychiatric disorder making them incapable of informed consent or adherence to follow up, along with patients who are unable to communicate in Danish or English will not be included in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with seroma3 monthsOne or more inguinal seroma(s) which require aspiration

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume of seromas for each participant3 monthsVolume of aspirated seromas (mL)
Number of participants with surgical wound infection3 monthsInguinal wound infection which require antibiotic treatment
Number of participants with wound rupture3 monthsInguinal wound rupture which require addition suturing or NPWT treatment
Number of participants with wound necrosis3 monthsInguinal wound necrosis which require debridement
Number of participants with hematoma3 monthsInguinal wound hematoma which require evacuation
Questionnaire EQ-5D-5LBaseline, 3 months and 2 yearsQuality of life measurement score
Number of seromas for each participant3 monthsNumber of aspirated seromas (No.)
Hospitalization readmission time3 monthsLength of hospital readmissions (days)
Number of participants with reoperations3 monthsRe-operation with opening of the wound or scar under general anesthesia due to adverse complications
Number of participants with lymphedema2 yearsClinical evaluation using the International Lymphedema Society staging
Questionnaire LYMQOL2 yearsLymphedema quality of life measurement score
Number of participants with regional recurrence2 yearsHistological verified recurrence to the inguinal site
Hospitalization time3 monthsLength of hospital stay until discharge (days)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026