Skip to content

Effects of Macular Buckle Versus Vitrectomy on Macular Hole and Macular Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes

A Randomized, Open Label, Single Center Study Comparing the Efficacy of Macular Buckle Versus Vitrectomy on Full-thickness Macular Hole and Concurrent Macular Detachment in Eyes With Highly Myopia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03433547
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-02-14
Start date
2018-01-30
Completion date
2018-08-20
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Myopia, Macular Detachment, Macular Holes

Keywords

macular buckling, full-thickness macular hole, macular detachment, internal limiting membrane peeling, high myopia

Brief summary

Full-thickness macular Hole associated with macular detachment is a one of the maculopathies of high myopia. There is controversy in the primary treatment for this situation. This study will compare the effects of macular buckling versus vitrectomy in a cohort of highly myopic eyes with this situation.

Detailed description

A randomized, open label, single center study comparing the efficacy of macular muckle + gas injection versus internal limiting membrane peeling + gas tamponade on full-thickness macular hole associated with macular detachment in eyes with high myopia.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBuckle

Surgical procedures of macular buckling

PROCEDUREVitrectomy

Surgical procedures of small gauge vitrectomy

OTHERLimbal paracentesis

Drainage of aqueous fluid (0.1-0.2 ml) through limbal paracentesis

OTHERGas injection

Inject gas ( C3F8 100%, 0.2ml-0.3ml) into vitreous cavity through pars plana.

OTHERPeeling internal limiting membrane

Peeling internal limiting membrane with forceps

Filling the vitreous cavity with gas (C3F8, 14%)

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* axial length ≥ 26.5 mm or refractive error (spherical equivalent) ≥ 8.0 diopter * full-thickness macular hole * macular retinal detachment * evidence of posterior staphyloma on clinical examination

Exclusion criteria

* macular detachment which extended to the peripheral retina (i.e., extension beyond the major vascular arcades in more than one quadrant) * a history of vitrectomy or scleral buckling * intraocular active hemorrhage or inflammation * any media opacity which precluded imaging or clinical evaluation of the macula

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retinal re-attachment rate1 monthSuccessful rate of reattachment of macular retina after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Macular hole status3 monthClosure rate of macular hole after surgery on optical coherence tomography
Post-operative best corrected visual acuity3 monthBest corrected visual acuity of the eyes after surgery

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026