Skip to content

Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03433339
Acronym
SPIDEP
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-02-14
Start date
2018-08-29
Completion date
2022-09-13
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

depression, transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation, non-invasive, major depressive disorder

Brief summary

This pilot clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous direct current stimulation (tsDCS) in major depressive disorder.

Detailed description

This study aims to 1) determine the efficacy and safety of tsDCS in adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 2) investigate interoceptive awareness, somatic symptoms, autonomic and metabolic regulation as potential mediators of antidepressant response to tsDCS. We predict that 1) Active tsDCS treatment will result in a greater decrease in depressive symptom severity compared to Sham tsDCS in adult patients with MDD, 2) active tsDCS will be safe and well tolerated in adult patients with MDD and 3) change in interoceptive awareness, somatic symptoms, and autonomic and metabolic parameters will be associated with change in depressive symptom severity. To accomplish these aims, we will conduct an 8-week, double blinded, randomized, sham controlled, parallel group, pilot clinical trial study design. A total of 20 adult antidepressant-free MDD patients will be randomized to receive Active (n=10) or Sham (n=10) tsDCS protocols for 8 weeks in a 1:1 ratio. We will combine the use of a tsDCS device, psychometric instruments to diagnose MDD, and measures of depressive symptom severity, somatic symptoms, interoceptive awareness, autonomic function (blood pressure, heart rate), and potential metabolic markers as predictors of response.

Interventions

DEVICEActive transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation

Active anode electrodes placed at Thoracic 10 level, Cathode electrode placed on right shoulder.

DEVICESham transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation

Sham anode electrodes placed at Thoracic 10 level, Cathode electrode placed on right shoulder.

Sponsors

Lindner Center of HOPE
CollaboratorOTHER
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An independent operator (trained personnel from the research team) will prepare the tsDCS device parameters for each session, but will not participate in the rest of the assessments. Patients and raters will remain blinded to spinal stimulation protocol assigned to each participant throughout the study.

Intervention model description

8-week, double blinded, randomized, sham controlled, parallel group, pilot clinical trial study design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age 18-55 yrs., inclusive 2. female or male 3. Body mass index (BMI) 18.5 to 35 kg/mts2, inclusive 4. current MDD episode diagnoses confirmed by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 5.0 with a duration of ≥1 month and ≤24 months 5. moderate MDD symptoms according to Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 20 to ≤35 6. no current or recent (past month) antidepressant pharmacological treatment 7. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and other anxiety symptoms will be permitted 8. using an effective contraceptive method (all participants of childbearing potential).

Exclusion criteria

1. Current or lifetime MDD episode non-responsive to two or more antidepressant treatments at adequate doses and time (including ECT) 2. Current or lifetime bipolar disorder or schizophrenia diagnosis 3. current (past month): PTSD, psychotic or substance use disorder (nicotine and caffeine allowed) 4. significant risk of suicide according to Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) or clinical judgment, or suicidal behavior in the past year 5. current chronic severe pain conditions 6. current chronic use of: opioids analgesics, medications that affect blood pressure or drugs with significant autonomic effects (stimulants and antipsychotics allowed if dose stable for 1 month) 7. neurological, endocrinological, cardiovascular (including diagnosed hypertension) or other clinically significant medical conditions as judged by the clinician 8. skin lesions on electrode placement region 9. implanted electrical medical devices 10. Pregnancy 11. suspected Intellectual quotient (IQ)\<80 12. any other clinically relevant reason as judged by the clinician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score Change8 weeks (or last available observation).Difference in change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale summed total scores scores between active and sham transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) groups. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptom severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)8 weeksClinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale score at week 8 (or last available information) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Range is from 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating better outcome.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sub-component Score (Item 2) Change8 weeksMADRS Item 2 score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. MADRS Item 2 (Reported sadness) scores range from 0 to 6 and a higher score indicates a worse severity.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score Change8 weeksPHQ-9 score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating worse severity.
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Score Change-Noticing Subscale8 weeksMAIA Noticing subscale score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Noticing Subscale scores range 0 to 5 and higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score Change8 weeksBES score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Scores range from 0 to 46, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4-DSQ)- Somatization Dimension Score Change8 weeks4-DSQ Somatization dimension score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Somatization scale scores range from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Systolic Blood Pressure Score Change8 weeksSystolic Blood Pressure score change in mmHg from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Normal range is considered below 140 mmHg. A greater decrease from baseline to week 8 in mmHg is considered favorable.
Number of Participants With Skin Redness8 weeksNumber of participants with skin redness in the active and sham tsDCS groups.
Body Mass Index Change8 weeksBody mass index (BMI) change in kg/mts2 from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Normal range is 18 to 25 kg/mt2. A decrease in value is considered favorable.
Adiponectin Level Change8 weeksAdiponectin level change (in ug/mL) from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. No normative levels available. Decreased levels are considered favorable in the context of the study.
Leptin Level Change8 weeksLeptin level (in ng/ml) change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Usual normal range 4.7 - 23.7 ng/ML. Decreased levels are considered favorable.
Cortisol Level Change8 weeksCortisol level change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Typical afternoon levels may range 5-10 nmol/L. Decreased levels are considered favorable outcomes.
Insulin Level Change8 weeksInsulin level change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Fasting range typically 16-166 Milli-international Units Per Liter (mIU/L). Decreased levels are considered a favorable outcome.
Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21) Level Change8 weeksFibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) level change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Levels in ng/ml. No normative range established. Decreased levels are considered favorable in the context of the study.
Fatty Acid (LCn-3) Level Change8 weeksFatty Acid (LCn-3) level percentage change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Results reported on Erythrocyte eicosapentaenoic acid + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA+DHA) percentage change. Increase in EPA+DHA would indicate a better outcome.
Heart Rate Score Change8 weeksHeart Rate score change in beats per minute (BPM) from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Normal BPM is considered between 60 to 100. A decrease in value is considered favorable.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All study procedures involving participants were conducted at the Lindner Center of HOPE (affiliated with the University of Cincinnati) in Mason, Ohio, with a recruitment period from August 29, 2018, to September 13, 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Pre-screened 671 participants. Forty two were assessed for eligibility on site. A total of 22 were excluded for not meeting eligibility criteria (n=19) or declined to participate (n=3). A total of 20 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Treatment
Thoracic anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation 2.5 milliampere (mA) for 20 min/ three times per week for 8 weeks. Active transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation: Active anode electrodes placed at Thoracic 10 level, Cathode electrode placed on right shoulder.
10
Sham Treatment
Thoracic anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current sham stimulation session of 20min/ three times per week for 8 weeks. Sham transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation: Sham anode electrodes placed at Thoracic 10 level, Cathode electrode placed on right shoulder.
9
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) Pandemic Related Restrictions02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Age, Continuous31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score29.0 summed total scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
29.4 summed total scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
29.2 summed total scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.05
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants9 participants19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 109 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score Change

Difference in change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale summed total scores scores between active and sham transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) groups. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptom severity.

Time frame: 8 weeks (or last available observation).

Population: All participants with at least one post baseline Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale total scores assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score Change-21.7 summed total scoresStandard Error 2.3
Sham TreatmentMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score Change-14.6 summed total scoresStandard Error 2.5
p-value: =0.04ANOVA
Secondary

Adiponectin Level Change

Adiponectin level change (in ug/mL) from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. No normative levels available. Decreased levels are considered favorable in the context of the study.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentAdiponectin Level Change-805 ug/mLStandard Error 1640
Sham TreatmentAdiponectin Level Change1472 ug/mLStandard Error 2409
Secondary

Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score Change

BES score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Scores range from 0 to 46, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentBinge Eating Scale (BES) Score Change-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Sham TreatmentBinge Eating Scale (BES) Score Change-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 3
Secondary

Body Mass Index Change

Body mass index (BMI) change in kg/mts2 from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Normal range is 18 to 25 kg/mt2. A decrease in value is considered favorable.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentBody Mass Index Change-0.3 kg/m^2Standard Error 2
Sham TreatmentBody Mass Index Change1.5 kg/m^2Standard Error 2.2
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale score at week 8 (or last available information) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Range is from 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating better outcome.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentClinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)1.3 total score of the scaleStandard Error 0.3
Sham TreatmentClinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)2.0 total score of the scaleStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Cortisol Level Change

Cortisol level change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Typical afternoon levels may range 5-10 nmol/L. Decreased levels are considered favorable outcomes.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentCortisol Level Change-0.7 nmol/LStandard Error 2.2
Sham TreatmentCortisol Level Change-0.9 nmol/LStandard Error 3.1
Secondary

Fatty Acid (LCn-3) Level Change

Fatty Acid (LCn-3) level percentage change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Results reported on Erythrocyte eicosapentaenoic acid + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA+DHA) percentage change. Increase in EPA+DHA would indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentFatty Acid (LCn-3) Level Change-0.02 Percentage changeStandard Error 0.19
Sham TreatmentFatty Acid (LCn-3) Level Change-0.01 Percentage changeStandard Error 0.22
Secondary

Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21) Level Change

Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) level change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Levels in ng/ml. No normative range established. Decreased levels are considered favorable in the context of the study.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentFibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21) Level Change-13.3 ng/mlStandard Error 53.2
Sham TreatmentFibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21) Level Change-30.9 ng/mlStandard Error 78.1
Secondary

Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4-DSQ)- Somatization Dimension Score Change

4-DSQ Somatization dimension score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Somatization scale scores range from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentFour-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4-DSQ)- Somatization Dimension Score Change-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Sham TreatmentFour-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4-DSQ)- Somatization Dimension Score Change-6.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Secondary

Heart Rate Score Change

Heart Rate score change in beats per minute (BPM) from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Normal BPM is considered between 60 to 100. A decrease in value is considered favorable.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentHeart Rate Score Change4.7 Beats per minuteStandard Error 3.9
Sham TreatmentHeart Rate Score Change5.3 Beats per minuteStandard Error 4.2
Secondary

Insulin Level Change

Insulin level change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Fasting range typically 16-166 Milli-international Units Per Liter (mIU/L). Decreased levels are considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentInsulin Level Change-4.2 Milli-international Units/ Liter (mIU/L)Standard Error 4.6
Sham TreatmentInsulin Level Change-7.2 Milli-international Units/ Liter (mIU/L)Standard Error 6.8
Secondary

Leptin Level Change

Leptin level (in ng/ml) change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Usual normal range 4.7 - 23.7 ng/ML. Decreased levels are considered favorable.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentLeptin Level Change-1.5 ng/mLStandard Error 4.4
Sham TreatmentLeptin Level Change2.7 ng/mLStandard Error 6.4
Secondary

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sub-component Score (Item 2) Change

MADRS Item 2 score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. MADRS Item 2 (Reported sadness) scores range from 0 to 6 and a higher score indicates a worse severity.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sub-component Score (Item 2) Change-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Sham TreatmentMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sub-component Score (Item 2) Change-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Score Change-Noticing Subscale

MAIA Noticing subscale score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Noticing Subscale scores range 0 to 5 and higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMultidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Score Change-Noticing Subscale-0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Sham TreatmentMultidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Score Change-Noticing Subscale-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Secondary

Number of Participants With Skin Redness

Number of participants with skin redness in the active and sham tsDCS groups.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentNumber of Participants With Skin Redness9 Participants
Sham TreatmentNumber of Participants With Skin Redness4 Participants
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score Change

PHQ-9 score change from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating worse severity.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score Change-12.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Sham TreatmentPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score Change-10.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure Score Change

Systolic Blood Pressure score change in mmHg from baseline to week 8 (or last available observation) difference between Active and Sham tsDCS groups. Normal range is considered below 140 mmHg. A greater decrease from baseline to week 8 in mmHg is considered favorable.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentSystolic Blood Pressure Score Change-5.0 mmHgStandard Error 3.9
Sham TreatmentSystolic Blood Pressure Score Change-2.9 mmHgStandard Error 4.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026