Skip to content

Brand Level Nutrient Information Compared to Generic Food Codes

Brand Level Nutrient Information Compared to Generic Food Codes: Impact on Results From Dietary Recalls

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03432962
Enrollment
61
Registered
2018-02-14
Start date
2015-10-01
Completion date
2016-05-05
Last updated
2018-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diet Records, Diet Surveys

Brief summary

Measuring diet is difficult. This is the first time that brand level foods and nutrient values have been compared with generic food codes to explore the difference this might make to estimated nutrient intakes.

Detailed description

Background Traditional dietary assessment methods lack precision. myfood24 is an online 24-hour dietary assessment tool, aiming to reduce the burden of dietary assessment; providing data entry by participants using automated coding of food items. myfood24 includes a large branded food database. Objective To assess the effect of using brand level nutrient information compared to generic food codes on estimated nutrient intakes. Design A 24 hour recall was collected using myfood24, which contains a food and nutrient database of over 40,000 items with both branded and generic foods. Participants freely selected their foods generating the 'free choice recall'. After the online recall was completed, they provided further details of brands consumed. The free choice recalls were recoded forming an 'all branded' and an 'all generic' recall. Estimated nutrient intakes from the three different methods of food coding were compared to assess the impact of brand-level information.

Interventions

OTHERno intervention - recoding of food recall only

recoding of food recall

Sponsors

British Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Leeds
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* students University of Leeds * convenience sample of general public * adults

Exclusion criteria

* none defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nutrient intakes by food coding24hour recallcomparison of nutrient intakes as a result of the recoding process with brand level data

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026