Skip to content

Impact of Anesthesia on the Dimension of the Ascending Aorta

Prospective Study to Examine the Impact of Anesthesia on the Dimension of the Ascending Aorta in Patients With a Dilated Aorta Who Undergo Open-heart Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03431870
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-02-13
Start date
2018-01-21
Completion date
2022-01-21
Last updated
2021-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of intra-operative TEE after the induction of anesthesia when assessing proximal thoracic aorta diameters in a cohort of aortic aneurysm patients.

Detailed description

Dilatation of the ascending aorta often progresses silently in an asymptomatic patient, until an acute complication occurs (such as a dissection or rupture), which is directly related to the diameter of the aortic. To prevent these extremely harmful situations, aortic replacement surgery, as indicated by significant dilatation of the ascending aorta, could be the option of choice (1). The decision to perform elective surgery depends on the measurement of the thoracic aorta diameter, which would rely on the largest aortic dimension. Trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) is widely used to assess the aortic root (2), and results from computed tomography (CT) scans are used to evaluate the ascending aorta beyond the sinotubular junction (3, 4). Both these tests facilitate follow-up evaluation of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm. Usually, patients are referred for surgery based on the findings of one or both of these examinations. Furthermore, when a patient is referred for surgery, intra-operative trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) is often performed after induction of the anesthesia in order to evaluate the aortic dimension and valve function. In some cases, the diameter of the aorta is considered borderline for replacement, in which case the TEE measurement could reverse the decision-making, especially when the indication for surgery is due to valve pathology, with the aorta being a secondary consideration. From the investigators experience, intra-operative TEE aortic measurements after the anesthesia are not entirely accurate, and could under-estimate the diameter of the aorta. Relying on intra-operative TEE measurements could result in under-treatment of the dilated aorta, especially when its replacement is secondary to other cardiac pathologies (e.g. AVR, CABG) that require surgery. Influence of intra-operative anesthesia on TEE measurements of the aorta are not described in the current literature. If the investigators hypothesis is correct, adjustments will need to be made regarding the surgical management of patients with borderline aortic dimensions.

Interventions

Perform a trans-esophageal echocardiography before and after anesthesia.

Sponsors

Sheba Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ascending aorta of 40 mm and above * Patients who undergo cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable patients * Patients who underwent a previous cardiac surgery * Patients who were diagnosed with aortic dissection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
difference in the aortic dimensionintraoperative10% difference in the aortic dimension before and after anaesthesia

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactDiana Kogan
Diana.Kogan@sheba.health.gov.il972-52-8646402

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026