Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of ASAQ and PD for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Mainland Tanzania

Efficacy and Safety of Artesunate-amodiaquine and Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Mainland Tanzania

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03431714
Acronym
GF-TES-2017
Enrollment
333
Registered
2018-02-13
Start date
2017-07-14
Completion date
2017-12-08
Last updated
2018-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria

Brief summary

The World Health Organization recommends regular surveillance of antimalarial efficacy to monitor the performance of different drugs. The Tanzanian National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) in collaboration with its partners have been implementing therapeutic efficacy studies (TES) to monitor the performance of different antimalarials in the country. Most of the studies conducted in recent years focused on artemether-lumefantrine which is the first line antimalarial for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Mainland Tanzania. However, data on the performance of other artemisinin based combination therapy (ACTs) is urgently needed to support timely review and changes of treatment guidelines in case of drug resistance to current regimen. This study was undertaken in the same NMCP framework to assess the efficacy and safety of alternative ACTs used or with potential use in Tanzania. The study assessed the efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania. The study was undertaken at two NMCP sentinel sites of Kibaha and Ujiji from July to December 2017.

Interventions

Drugs were administered under observation of the study nurse for three days

Sponsors

Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
World Health Organization
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The first group of 88 children were recruited first and given dihydroartemisinin- piperaquine, once the sample size was attained, the second group for artesunate amodiaquine followed and the follow-up for the two groups were running concurrently

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 6 months to 10 years. * mono-infection with P. falciparum detected by microscopy; * parasitaemia of 250 - 200,000/μl asexual forms; * presence of axillary temperature ≥37.5 °C or history of fever during the past 24 hours * ability to swallow oral medication; * ability and willingness to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the study and to comply with the study visit schedule; and * Informed consent from the parents or guardians of children.

Exclusion criteria

* mRDT negative * presence of general danger signs in children aged 6 months to 10 years or signs of severe falciparum malaria according to the definitions of WHO (Appendix 1); * weight under 5 Kg * mixed or mono-infection with another Plasmodium species detected by microscopy; * presence of severe malnutrition (defined as a child who has symmetrical oedema involving at least the feet or has a mid-upper arm circumference \< 110 mm in children ≤ 59 months; or BMI of \<16 in children aged 5 years and above) * presence of febrile conditions due to diseases other than malaria (e.g. measles, acute lower respiratory tract infection, severe diarrhoea with dehydration) or other known underlying chronic or severe diseases (e.g. cardiac, renal and hepatic diseases, HIV/AIDS); * regular medication, which may interfere with antimalarial pharmacokinetics; * history of hypersensitivity reactions or contraindications to any of the medicine(s) being tested or used as alternative treatment(s);

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adequate clinical response28 daysProportions of patients with 100% cure before PCR correction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PCR corrected responsesone months after study completionProportions of patients with 100% cure after PCR correction

Countries

Tanzania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026