Skip to content

CKD-11101 Phase 3 SC Study

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous CKD-11101 Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients Who Had Renal Anemia Not on Dialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03431623
Enrollment
248
Registered
2018-02-13
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2018-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate efficacy and safety of subcutaneous CKD-11101 versus Darbepoetin alfa in patients who have renal anemia not on dialysis.

Detailed description

This was designed as randomized, double-blind, multi-center, Phase 3 clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous CKD-11101 versus Darbepoetin Alfa in patients who had stage 3, stage 4, and stage 5 chronic renal failure not on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The selection criteria will be evaluated in patients who are receiving anemia correction among patients with 19 years of age or older and who had anemia in chronic renal failure of stage 3 or above. Subjects who are identified to meet all inclusion criteria will be randomized to test group and control group at 1:1 ratio and go through 24-week correction period and efficacy evaluation period. During correction period and efficacy evaluation period, subjects will visit the clinical study center every 2 weeks to receive processes designated for each visit and be administered investigational product from the investigator in charge of drug administration. In the safety evaluation period, all subjects will be administered test drug for 28weeks.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCKD-11101(Darbepoetin alfa)
BIOLOGICALNESP(Darbepoetin alfa)

Sponsors

Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase 3 clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria 1. Patients with 19 years of age or older 2. Patients with chronic renal failure of stage 3 or above who are not on dialysis 3. Patients with the Hb levels of 8 to 10g/dl measured at screening 4. Patients with enough body iron stores who meet the following item: -Serum ferritin ≥ 100ng/ml or Transferrin saturation ≥ 20% 5. Patients who have provided written consent to participate in the clinical trial voluntarily *

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are expected to need dialysis within a year or patients with rapidly progressive chronic renal failure 2. Patients who have received drug treatment such as erythropoiesis stimulating agent for the purpose of correcting anemia within 12 weeks prior to screening 3. Patients who have received red blood cell transfusion within 12 weeks prior to screening 4. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension 5. Patients who had hypersensitivity to erythropoietin agents 6. Patients who had known hypersensitivity to mammalian cell-derived products or additives 7. Patients with history of severe cardiovascular diseases 8. Patients whose anemia is not caused by chronic renal failure or may affect anemia correction including the following conditions: 9. Patients whose AST/ALT test results performed at screening exceeds twice of normal upper limit 10. Patients who have experience of positive result in anti-erythropoietin antibody in previous treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changed amount of mean hemoglobin level in evaluation period compared to the baseline([Mean of hemoglobin measured in Weeks 20 - 24] - [Hemoglobin measured at Week 0])The equivalence test on mean hemoglobin level of test drug and reference drug administration groups in evaluation period (Weeks 20 - 24) compared to the baseline (Week 0) will be conducted.
Mean administration dose in evaluation period: Mean dose administered in Weeks 20 - 24Weeks 20 - 24The equivalence test on mean administration dose of test drug and reference drug administration groups in evaluation period (Weeks 20 - 24) will be conducted.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean hemoglobin level for each weekWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 52Mean hemoglobin level for each week: Compare Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 52 between groups
Ratio of subjects who achieve target level of hemoglobinWeeks 20 - 24Ratio of subjects who achieve target level of hemoglobin: Compare the number of subjects who achieve target level of hemoglobin during the evaluation period between groups
Ratio of subjects who receive transfusionWeeks 0 - 24Ratio of subjects who receive red blood cell transfusion: Compare ratio of subjects who receive red blood cell transfusion during treatment period and evaluation period between groups
Changed amount of mean hemoglobin level at Weeks 20, 24, and 52 compared to the baselineWeeks 20, 24, and 52Compare the mean change of hemoglobin level at Weeks 20, 24, and 52 compared to the baseline
Days taken to reach target level of hemoglobinDays taken to reach up to 24 weeksDays taken to achieve target level of hemoglobin: Compare days taken to achieve target level of hemoglobin between groups

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026