Skip to content

The Benefit of Functional Movement Control for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

The Benefit of Increasing Physical Activity and Functional Movement Control for Patients With Stage II or III Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03431298
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-02-13
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2018-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis, Physical activity, Exercise

Brief summary

The study purpose is to explore the effect of functional movement control for patients who have stage II or III degenerative knee joint disease and also physical inactive. Half of patients will receive aerobic exercise and functional movement control training in combination, while the other will simply receive aerobic exercise.

Detailed description

Physical inactivity, which is a common phenomenon among patients with degenerative knee joint disease has been proved a predictor of increased symptoms and poor general health. However, changing the lifestyle of people with this disease who is physical inactive is still a problem which has not been solved. Knee pain may act as barrier to engage in physical activity and can influence patient's movement performance. The different effectiveness between the aerobic exercise and functional movement control training. Aerobic exercise has been proved could improve knee pain for the patients with degenerative knee joint disease. The functional movement control training could improve knee alignment during walking and other functional activities to increase patient's movement awareness.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAerobic exercise & movement control

The aerobic exercise content is no different between the experimental group and the active comparator group. The movement control is individual training which divided into fourths progressing sessions. * First, lumbo-pelvic and hip dynamic direction control. * Second, trunk muscle groups, hip muscle groups and thigh muscle groups extensibility control. * Third, trunk muscle groups and hip muscle groups through range control. * Fourth, functional movement control training

BEHAVIORALAerobic exercise

The aerobic exercise will organized in groups. Each group has 6-8 persons. The exercise form is fixed at each time. The description of exercise form is as below: * 10 min Warm up * 40 min Aerobic exercise (which focus on lower extremity muscle strengthening and increasing muscle endurance) * 10 min Cool down

Sponsors

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant who was diagnosed has knee osteoarthritis * Above 40 years old * Participant who didn't achieve at least 150 min moderate intensity physical activity level per week

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with walking disability * Cannot complete 8 weeks intervention program * Received arthroscopy or other surgery before 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
reaching proportions of the level of health enhancing physical activityup to 6 months after interventionthe recommended level of health enhancing physical activity is at least 150 min of moderate intensity physical activity per week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Partial foot area as a percentage of body mass indexBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionThe area footprinted during gait was divided into 6 parts. The partial foot area as a percentage of body mass index was calculated as the average value during the stance phase of each step in each part as a percentage of the body mass index.
Gait CadenceBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionthe number of steps per minute
Walking speedBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionthe velocity of single step
Single leg stance timeBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionthe time of the stance phase of each foot
Partial foot pressure as a percentage of body weightBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionThe area footprinted during gait was divided into 6 parts according to the average foot areas of subject. Then, the partial foot pressure as a percentage of body weight was calculated as the average value during the stance phase of each step in each part as a percentage of the body weight.
Step widthBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionthe distance between the centre of the first heel contact and the following one calculated perpendicularly to the direction of the horizontal axis drawn between the feet
Axis angleBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionthe angle formed by the medial tangent of the foot and the line from the second/third toe to the center of the heel
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionA questionnaire to assess the patient's opinion about their knee and associated problems.
Sort Form-12v2 Healthy SurveyBaseline and 1, 3, 6 month after intervention12 question to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view
Step lengthBaseline and up to 1 week after interventionthe distance between the first point of contact of a limb with the ground and the first point of contact of the limb on the opposite side

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChuan-Hsin Yen, BS
Yanlisa0728@gmail.com+886933301155
Backup ContactWen-Yin Chen, PhD
wychen@ym.edu.tw

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026