Hip Fractures
Conditions
Keywords
rehabilitation, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, clinical pathway, Fragility
Brief summary
A number of studies for clinical pathway (CP) after hip fracture have been suggested to improve post-fracture outcome. However, CP is not carried out properly in most countries due to inadequate system and awareness, and lack of interdisciplinary approach among orthopaedists, geriatricians and rehabilitation specialists. Thus, we developed Fragility fracture integrated rehabilitation management (FIRM), a new standardized guideline and the multidisciplinary fragility fracture care based on the clinical rehabilitation pathway and conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effects of FIRM compared to conventional rehabilitation.
Detailed description
The purpose of this prospective study To develop a standardized fragility fracture integrated rehabilitation management (FIRM) based on the critical rehabilitation pathway for fragility fractures. 1. Standardization of initial evaluation for fall and re-fracture risks before rehabilitation 2. Standardization in initial screening for prevention for common complication after fracture and early diagnosis 3. Evidence based standardization in rehabilitation after fragility fracture 4. Development for safe return to normal daily life
Interventions
OTHERFIRM
FIRM program consisted of total 10 days session including PT, in two times twenty-minute sessions per day and 4 times OT during admission initiated before transfer to rehabilitation ward. PT (Weight bearing exercise, strengthening exercise, gait training, aerobic exercise and functional training) progressed gradually based on individual functional level and OT of activities of daily life (ADL) training (transfer, sit to stand, bed mobility, dressing, self-care retraining and using adaptive equipment) was provided.
OTHERConventional rehabilitation
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted of total 10 days session of PT focused on simple standing and gait training, in one time twenty-minute sessions per day.
Sponsors
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Type of fracture : Femoral neck, intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric fracture 2. Type of surgery : Bipolar hemiarthroplasty, THA, ORIF
Exclusion criteria
1. Surgery not for hip fracture, but for infection, arthritis, implant loosening, AVN 2. Femur Shaft fracture, acetabular fracture, periprosthetic fracture, pathologic fracture for tumor 3. Combined multiple fracture (ex. Upper extremity) 4. Revision operation 5. Disagree to participation for clinical trial 6. Severe cognitive dysfunction (Obey command ≤1)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baselines mobility status (Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 5; decreasingly worse |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baselines mobility status (KOVAL) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 1 to 7; increasingly worse |
| Change from baselines mobility status (Functional Independence Measure (FIM)- locomotion) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 1 to 7; decreasingly worse |
| Change from baselines balance and fall risk (Berg Balance Scale (BBS)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 56; decreasingly worse |
| Change from baselines from cognition (Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 30; decreasingly worse |
| Change from baselines from mood (Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 30 ; increasingly worse |
| Change from baselines frailty (Korean version of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight (FRAIL) scale) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 5; increasingly worse |
| Change from baselines hand grip strength after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | measured by a a digital dynamometer (TKK 5401 Grip-D; Takei, Niigata, Japan) |
| Change from baselines Quality of life (Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire 5-Dimensional Classification (EQ-5D)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 1; decreasingly worse |
| Change from baselines from activities of daily life (Korean modified Barthel index (K-MBI)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 100; decreasingly worse |
| Change from baselines from activities of daily life (Korean instrumental ADL (K-IADL)) after rehabilitation | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | range, 0 to 3; increasingly worse |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | Mortality rate from number of dead patients among enrolled for the study |
| Recovery to premorbid ambulatory status | 0, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month | Comparison premorbid ambulatory status with post-rehabilitation ambulatory status at each follow-up period |
Countries
South Korea
Contacts
Primary ContactSeung-Kyu Lim, MD
Backup ContactBo-Ram KIM
Outcome results
None listed