Costs, Dental Caries, Oral Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Caries, Fluoride Varnish, Dental Health, Costs
Brief summary
This cluster-randomized controlled community trial aimed to assess the efficacy and costs of fluoride varnish application for caries prevention in a high-risk population in South Africa.
Detailed description
Despite advances in oral health, dental caries remains a significant problem - particularly in disadvantaged communities in low- and middle-income countries. A study in the Western Cape Region, which was conducted between 2001 and 2015, reported for example a caries prevalence of 84% for 6-years-old (Smit 2017), highlighting the need for oral health programs and cost-effective interventions. Fluoride varnish offers hereby a feasible possibility to supplement toothbrushing programs in order to improve fluoride delivery and consequently caries prevention. However, many studies failed to confirm the benefits of fluoride varnish for caries prevention, which may partially be explained by the fact that many of these studies were conducted in high-income countries, in which the caries increment is low due to a wide access to fluoride. This study, thus aimed to further validate the benefits of fluoride varnish application specifically in a primary school setting within a peri-urban, low socio-economic, high-caries risk community in South Africa.
Interventions
DEVICEFlairesse varnish
Flairesse is applied to enamel and dentine as protective varnish to prevent caries formation and to promote remineralization of initial caries. It is also used in the treatment of hypersensitive teeth by sealing dentin tubules and hypersensitive areas at the neck of the tooth and exposed root dentine. Flairesse varnish contains xylitol and fluoride (22,600 ppm). Both components have been well established for oral health by reducing caries prevalence and incidences. During the application, children sat upright; their teeth were first cleaned and dried with cotton wool rolls. After mixing the fluoride varnish, it was applied as a thin layer to all surfaces of the lower and upper dentition, including proximal surfaces (using floss in case of tight contact points) as well as pits and fissures (using a small brush that was provided together with the varnish by the manufacturer). Children were advised not to drink or eat directly after the application, while this could not be controlled.
Sponsors
Dental Wellness Trust (DWT)
University of Western Cape (UWC)
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Children in the reception grade and grade 1 of two schools in a township in South Africa are class-wise cluster-randomized to the fluoride varnish or control groups.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Reception grad or grade 1 (age 4-8) * Signed consent form * Good general health
Exclusion criteria
* Any allergies (especially sticking plaster) * History of asthma * Chronic Ulcerated gums * Chronic Stomatis * Participation in other study (except LifeSmart)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Increment of teeth with cavitated lesions, restorations or extraction. | 2 years | The primary outcome was the increment of teeth with cavitated lesions (i.e. newly developed ones or progressed, formerly non-cavitated lesions), requiring restorations or extraction. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Increment of teeth with cavitated lesions or restorations. | 2 years | The increment of teeth with cavitated caries lesions, receiving or requiring a restoration. |
| Increment of extracted teeth. | 2 years | The increment of teeth which were extracted due to caries. |
| Cost | 2 years | Initial costs of fluoride varnish application and re-treatment costs. |
Countries
South Africa
Outcome results
None listed