Skip to content

PET/CT and Bacterial/Fungal PCR in High Risk Febrile Neutropenia

Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections in Patients With Haematologic Malignancies: Examining Novel Diagnostics Including Bacterial and Fungal Multiplex PCR and FDG-PET Imaging

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03429387
Acronym
PIPPIN
Enrollment
147
Registered
2018-02-12
Start date
2018-01-08
Completion date
2021-01-23
Last updated
2022-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Autologous, Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Allogeneic, Febrile Neutropenia

Keywords

Diagnosis

Brief summary

Patients with acute leukaemia requiring induction or consolidation chemotherapy and those requiring a haematopoietic stem cell transplant are at high risk of fever and infection when they have low white cell counts (neutropenic fever). The causes of neutropenic fever are frequently unknown and patients are treated with broad antibiotics, without a clear target to what is being treated. This study will prospectively enroll patients who are receiving chemotherapy for acute leukaemia or for a stem cell transplant and compare the diagnostic utility of bacterial and fungal PCR performed directly off blood drawn, to the standard blood culture. Patients who have persistent fever after 72 hours of antibiotics will then be randomized to have either the interventional scan (PET/CT) or the conventional scan (standard CT) to look for a source of infection. Diagnostic yield, change in management and outcomes will be compared between arms.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFDG-PET/CT

FDG-PET performed with low dose CT

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTConventional CT

HRCT and CT of sinuses +/- other regions as per clinician's discretion

Sponsors

Melbourne Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Westmead Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized to either the PET/CT arm or the conventional CT arm

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* About to have an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant, OR * About to have an autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant, OR * Commencing induction or consolidation chemotherapy with curative intent for acute myeloid or acute lymphoid leukaemia

Exclusion criteria

* Current actively diagnosed infection prior to transplant or chemotherapy * Allergy to intravenous contrast for CT imaging * eGFR \<30 * Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in management following randomized scanWithin 48 hours of scan resultDefined as: * referral for targeted sampling, referral for surgery * change in antimicrobial therapy * removal of a central line

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital length of stayBy hospital discharge, an average of 4 weeksThe duration (in days) of hospital length of stay for the episode in which neutropenic fever occurred
Costs of hospital careBy hospital discharge, an average of 4 weeksThe overall cost of the inpatient stay for the episode in which neutropenic fever occurred
Proportion of participants with a cause of neutropenic feverBy hospital discharge, an average of 4 weeksThe proportion of participants in each arm where there is a confirmed cause of neutropenic fever
In hospital mortalityBy hospital discharge, an average of 4 weeksThe proportion of patients per arm who have passed away during the admission in which neutropenic fever occurred
6 month mortality6 months from study entryThe proportion of patients per arm who have passed away 6 months post study entry
Proportion admitted to intensive careBy hospital discharge, an average of 4 weeksThe proportion of patients in each arm who were admitted to intensive care during their admission in which neutropenic fever occurred

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026