Skip to content

Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width

Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03429374
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-02-12
Start date
2018-11-19
Completion date
2021-05-20
Last updated
2021-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Hernia

Brief summary

In laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, an abundance of methods has been developed to fix the mesh to the abdominal wall, including sutures (non-absorbable or absorbable), staples (non-absorbable or absorbable), clips, tacks (non-absorbable or absorbable) and (fibrin and synthetic) glues. Which fixation technique is superior, is still under evaluation. There is clearly a need for larger trials to obtain confident results on the safety and performance of glue mesh fixation and tack mesh fixation in LVHR. The hypothesis of this prospective, randomized controlled study is that post-operative pain at 4 to 6 weeks after mesh fixation with glue (LiquiBand® Fix 8™) will not differ compared to treatment with absorbable tacks during LVHR. A total of 510 patients will be recruited for this trial. This study will assess: pain, hernia recurrence, safety, procedural characteristics, technical success, analgesic intake, period to return to normal activity and quality of life.

Interventions

LiquiBand® Fix 8™ (Advanced Medical Solutions - Plymouth, UK) is a hernia mesh fixation device providing strong and secure mesh fixation without causing any tissue damage or mechanical trauma. This device is designed to offer precise and controlled delivery of tissue glue (n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate), resulting in a strong mesh fixation.

DEVICEAbsorbable tack

Absorbable tack

Sponsors

Duomed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Patients are randomly allocated to group 1 or group 2: * Group 1: Mesh fixation with tacks. * Group 2: Mesh fixation with glue.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient with ventral hernia (primary or incisional) with a defect size between 2 and 5 cm and eligible for laparoscopic repair. 2. Patients with ASA grade I to III. 3. Patient is at least 18 years old. 4. Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient with a recurrence of a previously treated ventral hernia repaired with mesh. Recurrences are only allowed to be included after former primary (suture) repair or retromuscular/onlay mesh repair. 2. Patient is treated by open surgery. 3. Patient has more than one defect. Treatment of Swiss-cheese defects (multiple small defects) is allowed if all defects can be treated with one mesh. Total width cannot exceed 5 cm. 4. Patient with a complex hernia, likely not eligible for laparoscopic repair. Complexity is determined by the investigator (adhesions, small bowel resection, etc). 5. Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. 6. Patient is suspected of being unable to comply with the study protocol. 7. Patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 8. Patient with ASA IV or V. 9. Patient is pregnant. 10. Patient needs acute surgery. 11. Patient is scheduled for surgery within 6 weeks after the index-procedure. 12. Patient has fibromyalgia. 13. Patient with depression as shown in patient medical record. 14. Patient is enrolled in another study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain in both groups at 4-6 weeks after LVHR using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)At 4 - 6 weeksThe VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating timeIntra-operatively
Intra-operative adverse eventsIntra-operativelyIntra-operative adverse events include bleeding and enterotomy
Post-operative adverse eventsup to 24 months follow-upPost-operative adverse events include seroma (i.e. accumulation of wound fluid), ileus (i.e. bowel obstruction), infection, bowel injury, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion or re-intervention, complications due to anesthesia and minor bleeding at a trocar insertion site
Usability of the glue during the index-procedureIntra-operativelyUsability scoring: 1 = bad -\> 3 = moderate -\> 5 = excellent
Technical success of glue fixationIntra-operativelyDuring the index-procedure, the investigator will register whether fixation of the mesh with glue achieved technical success or not. Technical success is defined as successful hernia repair as intended.
Technical success of tack fixationIntra-operativelyDuring the index-procedure, the investigator will register whether fixation of the mesh with tacks achieved technical success or not. Technical success is defined as successful hernia repair as intended.
Pain at baseline using the VAS scaleAt baselineThe VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Pain at discharge using the VAS scaleUp to 5 daysThe VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Period of hospitalizationup to 5 daysRecord the number of days in hospital until discharge
Pain at 24 months follow-up using the VAS scaleAt 24 months follow-upThe VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Postoperative analgesic intakeUp to 24 months follow-upPeriod of intake
Period to return to normal activityAt 4 - 6 weeks follow-upNumber of days after the index-procedure at which the patient resumes normal activities.
Quality of life at baseline.At baselineThe Carolinas Comfort Scale questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific, quality of life questionnaire developed for patients undergoing hernia repair with mesh. It is a 23-item questionnaire that measures severity of pain, sensation, and movement limitations from the mesh in eight categories. The CCS score is derived by adding the scores from each of the 23 items. The best possible score is 0 and the worst possible score is 115.
Quality of life at 4-6 weeks.At 4 - 6 weeks follow-upCCS questionnaire
Quality of life at 12 months follow-up.At 12 months follow-upCCS questionnaire
Quality of life at 24 months follow-up.At 24 months follow-upCCS questionnaire
Recurrences during follow-upup to 24 months follow-upA clinical examination is conducted to evaluate recurrence. If there is any suspicion of recurrence, an ultrasound or MRI is performed according to hospital practice to distinguish true recurrences from bulging.
Pain at 12 months follow-up using the VAS scaleAt 12 months follow-upThe VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026