Skip to content

Safety and Tolerability Study of Diazepam Buccal Film (DBF) in Subjects With Epilepsy

An Open-Label, Safety and Tolerability Study of Chronic Intermittent Use of Diazepam Buccal Film (DBF) in Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Epilepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03428360
Acronym
DBF
Enrollment
149
Registered
2018-02-09
Start date
2018-01-23
Completion date
2020-06-25
Last updated
2021-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Keywords

Seizure

Brief summary

This Phase 3, multicenter, open-label study of chronic, intermittent use of study drug (DBF) is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the buccal formulation of diazepam in children, adolescents and adults with intermittent, stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity (eg, seizure clusters) that are distinct from the subject's usual seizure pattern.

Detailed description

The Primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of DBF (study drug) administered a minimum of 3 times to subjects with epilepsy for the treatment of seizures over a minimum 6-month period. Secondary objectives: * To evaluate the usability of study drug as assessed by the ability of caregivers/subjects to administer study drug based on the Instructions for Use (IFU). * To evaluate the Quality of Life (QoL) of the subjects during the study drug treatment period as assessed by use of age-appropriate epilepsy scales over a minimum 6-month period.

Interventions

DRUGDiazepam Buccal Soluble Film 5, 7.5,10, 12.5,15 or 17.5 mg with individual dose determined according to age and weight category

The subjects in this study administered DBF themselves or with the help of a caregiver, (trained by the study site staff in study drug administration and documentation) in the same setting as they typically used the diazepam rectal gel or other rescue medication, without the presence of study staff.

Sponsors

Syneos Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Covance
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Aquestive Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study population was male or female pediatric, adolescent, and adult subjects with a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy and with bouts of increased seizure activity, frequent breakthrough seizures, seizure clusters, or cluster seizures and who were on chronic, intermittent use of rescue medication (eg, Diastat AcuDial or other benzodiazepine).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female or male subject between the ages of 2 and 65 years of age, inclusive 2. Written informed consent to participate in the study 3. Subject has an established diagnosis of epilepsy either partial or generalized epilepsy with motor seizures with clear alteration of awareness, and while on a regimen of anti-epileptic medication(s), still experiences bouts of seizures (frequent break through seizures, e.g. Acute Repetitive Seizures (ARS) or seizure clusters) and who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may need benzodiazepine intervention for seizure control at least 1 time a month on average. 4. Caregiver, if needed for subject, provides written informed consent and is able to administer study drug in the event of a seizure. 5. Female subjects ≥12 years of age have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. Female subjects of childbearing potential, (not surgically sterile or less than 2 years postmenopausal), must have a partner who is sterile, agrees to abstinence, be practicing double barrier contraception or using an FDA approved contraceptive (e.g., licensed hormonal or barrier methods) for greater than 2 months prior to screening visit and commit to an acceptable form of birth control for the duration of the study and for 30 days after the study 6. No aspects of the medical history and/or the physical-neurological examination that at the judgment of the Investigator, in consultation with the Sponsor, will interfere with administration or absorption of study drug, or could evolve into a safety issue 7. No clinically significant abnormal findings on the electrocardiogram (QTcF≤450 msec for males and QTcF≤470 msec for females) 8. Subject and caregiver must be willing to comply with all study visits and all required study procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. A history of clinically significant gastrointestinal, renal/genitourinary, hepatic, hematologic, dermatologic, endocrine, oncologic, pulmonary, immunologic, psychiatric, or cardiovascular disease, or any other clinically significant abnormalities, such as physical examination, vital signs, laboratory tests or ECG at Screening or Baseline which in the opinion of the investigator require further investigation or treatment or which may interfere with study procedures or safety or other medical conditions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, renal disease) which are not adequately and stably controlled, or which in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the subject's safety or interfere with the study assessments or any other condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject 2. Subject has had significant traumatic injury, major surgery or open biopsy within 30 days prior to study screening 3. Subject with an active major depression or a past suicide attempt, or any suicidal ideation of 4, or 5 or any suicidal behavior in lifetime using Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale(C-SSRS). The pediatric C-SSRS should be used for subjects 6 to 11 years of age. The adult C-SSRS should be used for subjects ≥12 years of age. Note that this exclusion is only applicable to cognitive-appropriate subjects who are able to understand and complete the Suicide Rating Scale 4. A history of allergic or adverse responses to diazepam or any other benzodiazepine 5. Participation in a clinical trial other than MonoSol Rx Phase 2 studies 160325 and 160326 within 30 days prior to Day 0. Participation in an observational (non-interventional) study is not an exclusion, provided that there are no scheduling conflicts with this study. Received any other investigational medication (unless it can be documented that the subject received only placebo) or device within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before assignment to study drug treatment 6. Lactating female or positive serum pregnancy test (ß-hCG) at screening for female subjects ≥12 years of age 7. Positive blood screen for HIV, HbSAg, or Hepatitis C, or a positive urine screen for alcohol or drugs of abuse, except marijuana use for medicinal indications. When marijuana is or was used for medicinal indications in the opinion of the Investigator, it is not considered as drug abuse and the subject can be enrolled in states where medical marijuana use is legal, even if the marijuana metabolites in the urine revealed as positive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).A TEAE was defined as any adverse event with onset date on the day of or after administration of study drug including relationship and severity.
Number of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESIs were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).A.Oral irritation related AEs including but not limited to: buccal mucosal swelling, mouth ulceration, injuries to oral cavity (such as tongue or mucosal laceration, broken tooth, bleeding), erythema, stomatitis, gingivitis, xerostomia, staining, dysphagia, dysgeusia, burning, stinging, tingling. B. Abuse related AEs including euphoria, euphoric mood, feeling of relaxation, anger, dissociative effects, hallucinations, psychosis, changes in mood, impaired cognition, attention, psychomotor effects, inappropriate affect, overdose, and misuse. C. Other: Respiratory disorders, nervous system disorders

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Usability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use OccasionRecorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsFor each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in removing study drug from foil pouch on this occasion? Yes or No
Number of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in CheekRecorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsOf the total number of use occasions over the course of the study, the number of use occasions that were successfully inserted/retained in the cheek
Usability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsFor each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the outer plastic packaging on this use occasion? Yes
Usability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until DissolutionRecorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsNumber of occasions where the study drug was not successfully placed and or retained in cheek until the film fully dissolved.
Usability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use OccasionRecorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsReasons for multiple attempts at insertion Multiple choice answer was: Excessive drooling, Clenching jaw / Won't open mouth, Spit out before sticking, Other/None of the above
Usability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsNumber of occasions where it took 1 attempt to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 2 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 3 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took \>3 attempts to insert film
Usability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use OccasionRecorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 monthsFor each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the foil pouch on this use occasion? Yes or No

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

150 subjects with epilepsy passed screening but 1 was never enrolled

Pre-assignment details

149 were enrolled but only 130 received at least 1 dose of study drug and were included in the analyses

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
Male or female subjects between the ages of 2 and 65 years who had an established diagnosis of epilepsy exhibited by motor seizures with clear alteration of awareness, and while on a regimen of anti-epileptic medication(s), still experienced bouts of seizures (frequent breakthrough seizures, eg, seizure clusters) and who, in the opinion of the Investigator, could need benzodiazepine intervention for seizure control at least 1 time a month on average. Subjects must have been on at least 1 concomitant anti-epileptic drug at screening. Diazepam Buccal Soluble Film 5, 7.5,10, 12.5,15 or 17.5 mg with individual dose determined according to age and weight category: The subjects in this study administered DBF themselves or with the help of a caregiver, (trained by the study site staff in study drug administration and documentation) in the same setting as they typically used the diazepam rectal gel or other rescue medication, without the presence of study staff.
130
Total130

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyInformed consent withdrawn5
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyNon-compliant with study1
Overall StudyNon-compliant with study drug3
Overall StudyNot on antiepileptic drug1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSafety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
Age, Continuous25.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.28
Body Mass Index (kg/m^224.108 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8148
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 130
other
Total, other adverse events
84 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 130

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

A.Oral irritation related AEs including but not limited to: buccal mucosal swelling, mouth ulceration, injuries to oral cavity (such as tongue or mucosal laceration, broken tooth, bleeding), erythema, stomatitis, gingivitis, xerostomia, staining, dysphagia, dysgeusia, burning, stinging, tingling. B. Abuse related AEs including euphoria, euphoric mood, feeling of relaxation, anger, dissociative effects, hallucinations, psychosis, changes in mood, impaired cognition, attention, psychomotor effects, inappropriate affect, overdose, and misuse. C. Other: Respiratory disorders, nervous system disorders

Time frame: AESIs were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Any adverse event of special interest32 participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Any oral safety adverse event8 participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Any other adverse event of special interest8 participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Any oral irritation adverse event3 participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Any potential abuse related adverse event21 participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Any abuse related adverse event1 participants
Primary

Number of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

A TEAE was defined as any adverse event with onset date on the day of or after administration of study drug including relationship and severity.

Time frame: Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)At least 1 TEAE84 Participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)At least 1 severe TEAE14 Participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)At least 1 study drug related TEAE10 Participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)At least 1 severe and related TEAE1 Participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)At least 1 serious TEAE18 Participants
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)At least 1 serious and related TEAE1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in Cheek

Of the total number of use occasions over the course of the study, the number of use occasions that were successfully inserted/retained in the cheek

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugNumber of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in Cheek1330 Number of events
Secondary

Usability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion

For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the foil pouch on this use occasion? Yes or No

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Number of subjects reporting use occasions

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use OccasionYes, I had difficulty opening the foil pouch391 total number of use occasions
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use OccasionNo, I did not have difficulty opening the foil pouch957 total number of use occasions
Secondary

Usability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion

For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in removing study drug from foil pouch on this occasion? Yes or No

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use OccasionYes, I had difficulty removing study drug from pouch on this occasion47 total number of use occasions rpoeted
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use OccasionNo, I did not have difficulty removing study drug from the pouch on this occasion1301 total number of use occasions rpoeted
Secondary

Usability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)

Number of occasions where it took 1 attempt to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 2 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 3 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took \>3 attempts to insert film

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)Number of occasions where it required 1 attempt to insert film1268 Number of events
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)Number of occasions that required 2 attempts to insert film38 Number of events
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)Number of occasions that required 3 attempts to insert film18 Number of events
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)Number of occasions that required >3 attempts to insert film6 Number of events
Secondary

Usability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until Dissolution

Number of occasions where the study drug was not successfully placed and or retained in cheek until the film fully dissolved.

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until Dissolution16 total number of use occasions
Secondary

Usability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.

For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the outer plastic packaging on this use occasion? Yes

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.211 total number of use occasions
Secondary

Usability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use Occasion

Reasons for multiple attempts at insertion Multiple choice answer was: Excessive drooling, Clenching jaw / Won't open mouth, Spit out before sticking, Other/None of the above

Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use OccasionClenching jaw / won't open mouth21 total number of use occasions
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use OccasionExcessive drooling24 total number of use occasions
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use OccasionSpit out before sticking17 total number of use occasions
Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugUsability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use OccasionOther (none of the above)33 total number of use occasions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026